Literature DB >> 18773914

Modified sham feeding of sweet solutions in women with and without bulimia nervosa.

D A Klein1, J E Schebendach, A J Brown, G P Smith, B T Walsh.   

Abstract

Although it is possible that binge eating in humans is due to increased responsiveness of orosensory excitatory controls of eating, there is no direct evidence for this because food ingested during a test meal stimulates both orosensory excitatory and postingestive inhibitory controls. To overcome this problem, we adapted the modified sham feeding technique (MSF) to measure the orosensory excitatory control of intake of a series of sweetened solutions. Previously published data showed the feasibility of a "sip-and-spit" procedure in nine healthy control women using solutions flavored with cherry Kool Aid and sweetened with sucrose (0-20%). The current study extended this technique to measure the intake of artificially sweetened solutions in women with bulimia nervosa (BN) and in women with no history of eating disorders. Ten healthy women and 11 women with BN were randomly presented with cherry Kool Aid solutions sweetened with five concentrations of aspartame (0, 0.01, 0.03, 0.08 and 0.28%) in a closed opaque container fitted with a straw. They were instructed to sip as much as they wanted of the solution during 1-minute trials and to spit the fluid out into another opaque container. Across all subjects, presence of sweetener increased intake (p<0.001). Women with BN sipped 40.5-53.1% more of all solutions than controls (p=0.03 for total intake across all solutions). Self-report ratings of liking, wanting and sweetness of solutions did not differ between groups. These results support the feasibility of a MSF procedure using artificially sweetened solutions, and the hypothesis that the orosensory stimulation of MSF provokes larger intake in women with BN than controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18773914      PMCID: PMC2680730          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  24 in total

1.  Intake, sweetness and liking during modified sham feeding of sucrose solutions.

Authors:  D A Klein; J S Schebendach; M J Devlin; G P Smith; B T Walsh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-01-24

2.  Habitual high and low consumers of artificially-sweetened beverages: effects of sweet taste and energy on short-term appetite.

Authors:  K M Appleton; J E Blundell
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-04-27

3.  Oral exposure and sensory-specific satiety.

Authors:  A J P G Smeets; M S Westerterp-Plantenga
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-07-27

Review 4.  Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives.

Authors:  Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy; John E Hayes; Howard R Moskowitz; Derek J Snyder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Food reward: brain substrates of wanting and liking.

Authors:  K C Berridge
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 6.  The direct and indirect controls of meal size.

Authors:  G P Smith
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Orosensory stimulation is sufficient and postingestive negative feedback is not necessary for neuropeptide Y to increase sucrose intake.

Authors:  A-M Torregrossa; J D Davis; G P Smith
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-03-15

8.  Psychophysical measurement of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taste perception.

Authors:  L A Lucchina; O F Curtis; P Putnam; A Drewnowski; J M Prutkin; L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1998-11-30       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Salivary and gustatory alterations among bulimia nervosa patients.

Authors:  T Blazer; Y Latzer; R M Nagler
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Artificial sweetener use among individuals with eating disorders.

Authors:  Diane A Klein; Gillian S Boudreau; Michael J Devlin; B Timothy Walsh
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.861

View more
  11 in total

1.  A sipometer for measuring motivation to consume and reward value of foods and beverages in humans: Description and proof of principle.

Authors:  P S Hogenkamp; A Shechter; M-P St-Onge; A Sclafani; H R Kissileff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-01-13

Review 2.  'Liking' and 'wanting' food rewards: brain substrates and roles in eating disorders.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-03-29

Review 3.  Physiological mechanisms by which non-nutritive sweeteners may impact body weight and metabolism.

Authors:  Mary V Burke; Dana M Small
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-06-03

4.  Modified sham feeding of sweet solutions in women with anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  D A Klein; J E Schebendach; M Gershkovich; G P Smith; B T Walsh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-05-09

5.  Assessment of the motivation to use artificial sweetener among individuals with an eating disorder.

Authors:  Janet Schebendach; Diane A Klein; Laurel E S Mayer; Evelyn Attia; Michael J Devlin; Richard W Foltin; B Timothy Walsh
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 6.  An interoceptive model of bulimia nervosa: A neurobiological systematic review.

Authors:  Megan Klabunde; Danielle Collado; Cara Bohon
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.791

7.  Oral sensory and cephalic hormonal responses to fat and non-fat liquids in bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  Nicholas T Bello; Janelle W Coughlin; Graham W Redgrave; Timothy H Moran; Angela S Guarda
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-02-04

Review 8.  Cognitive Neuroscience of Eating Disorders.

Authors:  Joanna E Steinglass; Laura A Berner; Evelyn Attia
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2018-12-03

9.  What contributes to excessive diet soda intake in eating disorders: appetitive drive, weight concerns, or both?

Authors:  Tiffany A Brown; Pamela K Keel
Journal:  Eat Disord       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.222

10.  A Systematic Review of Taste Differences Among People With Eating Disorders.

Authors:  Ariana M Chao; Abhrarup Roy; Alexis T Franks; Paule V Joseph
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.