Literature DB >> 16434068

Intake, sweetness and liking during modified sham feeding of sucrose solutions.

D A Klein1, J S Schebendach, M J Devlin, G P Smith, B T Walsh.   

Abstract

Although sweet solids and liquids are palatable to humans and ingested frequently when readily available, the quantitative relationship between sweet taste and intake has not been reported in humans. To investigate the quantitative relationship between sweet taste and intake directly, we adapted the modified sham feeding technique, previously used in humans for the study of the orosensory control of autonomic, neuroendocrine, and metabolic mechanisms, to measure the intake of solutions both unsweetened and sweetened with four concentrations of sucrose. By limiting the sucrose stimuli to the mouth, the modified sham feeding technique measures the orosensory stimulation of intake by sucrose in the absence of inhibitory postingestive stimulation. Nine healthy women were randomly presented with two series of five solutions of cherry Kool Aid unsweetened or sweetened with one of four concentrations of sucrose (2.5%, 5%, 10%, or 20%) in a closed opaque container fitted with a straw. They were instructed to sip as much as they wanted of the liquid during 2-min trials and to spit the fluid out into another opaque container. At the end of each trial, they used Visual Analogue Scales to rate the perceived intensities of sweetness and liking of the liquid that they had just sipped and spit. Intake, liking and perceived sweetness were significantly affected by sucrose concentration (p values</=0.038). Intake at 20% was not significantly larger than 10% or 5%. The effects of sucrose were presumably due to orosensory stimulation in the absence of postingestive stimulation because the amount of liquid spit out did not differ significantly from the amount sipped.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16434068     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  8 in total

1.  A sipometer for measuring motivation to consume and reward value of foods and beverages in humans: Description and proof of principle.

Authors:  P S Hogenkamp; A Shechter; M-P St-Onge; A Sclafani; H R Kissileff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-01-13

Review 2.  Physiological mechanisms by which non-nutritive sweeteners may impact body weight and metabolism.

Authors:  Mary V Burke; Dana M Small
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-06-03

3.  Modified sham feeding of sweet solutions in women with anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  D A Klein; J E Schebendach; M Gershkovich; G P Smith; B T Walsh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-05-09

4.  Assessment of the motivation to use artificial sweetener among individuals with an eating disorder.

Authors:  Janet Schebendach; Diane A Klein; Laurel E S Mayer; Evelyn Attia; Michael J Devlin; Richard W Foltin; B Timothy Walsh
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Oral sensory and cephalic hormonal responses to fat and non-fat liquids in bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  Nicholas T Bello; Janelle W Coughlin; Graham W Redgrave; Timothy H Moran; Angela S Guarda
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-02-04

6.  Use of an operant task to estimate food reinforcement in adult humans with and without BED.

Authors:  Jennifer A Nasser; Suzette M Evans; Allan Geliebter; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Richard W Foltin
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Modified sham feeding of sweet solutions in women with and without bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  D A Klein; J E Schebendach; A J Brown; G P Smith; B T Walsh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-08-17

8.  Preoperative liking and wanting for sweet beverages as predictors of body weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Claudio E Perez-Leighton; Jeon D Hamm; Ari Shechter; Shoran Tamura; Blandine Laferrère; Jeanine Albu; Danielle Greenberg; Harry R Kissileff
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.095

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.