Literature DB >> 16540131

Orosensory stimulation is sufficient and postingestive negative feedback is not necessary for neuropeptide Y to increase sucrose intake.

A-M Torregrossa1, J D Davis, G P Smith.   

Abstract

Although central administration of neuropeptide Y (NPY) has a potent orexic effect, it is not clear how NPY changes the potency of peripheral feedbacks from the gut to prolong eating and increase meal size. It has been suggested that NPY increases the stimulating effect of orosensory sweet stimuli or that it decreases the inhibitory effect of postingestive stimuli. To clarify this issue, we compared the orexic effect of NPY (2 microg) injected into the third ventricle of the brain on the volume and microstructure of intake of 0.8M sucrose during sham feeding (SF) and real feeding (RF) in male Sprague Dawley rats. The rationale for this comparison is that orosensory stimulation occurs in SF and RF, but postingestive negative feedback is present only in RF. NPY increased the volume ingested and the rate and number of clusters of licking significantly more in SF than in RF. This demonstrates that orosensory sucrose stimulation is sufficient and postingestive negative feedback is not necessary for the orexic effect of NPY under these experimental conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16540131     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  9 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral controls of food intake.

Authors:  Stephen C Benoit; Andrea L Tracy
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 2.  Novel functions of orexigenic hypothalamic peptides: from genes to behavior.

Authors:  Stephen C Benoit; Andrea L Tracy; Jon F Davis; Derrick Choi; Deborah J Clegg
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.008

3.  Inactivation of the median raphe nucleus increases intake of sucrose solutions: a microstructural analysis.

Authors:  David Wirtshafter; John D Davis; Thomas R Stratford
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 4.  Characterizing ingestive behavior through licking microstructure: Underlying neurobiology and its use in the study of obesity in animal models.

Authors:  Alexander W Johnson
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.457

5.  Ghrelin increases the motivation to eat, but does not alter food palatability.

Authors:  Joost Overduin; Dianne P Figlewicz; Jennifer Bennett-Jay; Sepideh Kittleson; David E Cummings
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Y1 receptors modulate taste-related behavioral responsiveness in male mice to prototypical gustatory stimuli.

Authors:  Ian G Malone; Brianna K Hunter; Heidi L Rossow; Herbert Herzog; Sergei Zolotukhin; Steven D Munger; Cedrick D Dotson
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 3.587

7.  Effects of hindbrain melanin-concentrating hormone and neuropeptide Y administration on licking for water, saccharin, and sucrose solutions.

Authors:  John-Paul Baird; Catalina Rios; Jasmine L Loveland; Janine Beck; Alice Tran; Carrie E Mahoney
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 8.  The taste of sugars.

Authors:  Stuart A McCaughey
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Modified sham feeding of sweet solutions in women with and without bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  D A Klein; J E Schebendach; A J Brown; G P Smith; B T Walsh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-08-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.