Literature DB >> 28089706

A sipometer for measuring motivation to consume and reward value of foods and beverages in humans: Description and proof of principle.

P S Hogenkamp1, A Shechter2, M-P St-Onge2, A Sclafani3, H R Kissileff4.   

Abstract

New methods, derived from animal work, for measuring food reward value (i.e. reinforcing value of food), and motivation (i.e. strength of desire) to consume, in humans are described and validated. A sipping device (sipometer) was developed that permits access to a liquid food or beverage on two reward schedules: continuous reinforcement (CR) and progressively increasing time spent exerting pressure on a straw (PR-schedule). In addition, a pictorial scale showing a cup, from which the 'amount wanted' could be marked was used to pre-test potential consumption. Intake, time spent sipping, breakpoint, and pressure exerted were the main dependent variables measured. Three pilot experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, participants (n=8) consumed yogurt shakes after a 1-h or 21-h food deprivation period on both schedules. In Experiment 2, participants (n=8) sham-consumed (i.e. spit out) sweet and non-sweet beverages, utilizing both schedules. In Experiment 3, sham-consuming sweet and non-sweet beverages on both schedules and working for shake on the PR schedule were repeated, after three nights of either habitual sleep or short sleep duration (n=7) in a crossover design. In Experiment 1, participants sipped longer after 21-h vs. 1-h of food deprivation (13±3.0 vs. 8.0±2.1s; p=0.04), on the PR schedule. In Experiment 2, sham-intake (p=0.01) and sipping time (p=0.04) were greater for sweet than non-sweet beverages on the PR schedule and a similar, though not conventionally significant, effect was observed for exerted pressure (p=0.09). In both Experiment 2 and Experiment 3 after habitual sleep, on the PR schedule, cumulative pressure difference between sweet and non-sweet beverage increased with difference in amount wanted in the taste test. In contrast, after short sleep participants were less willing to work for sweet taste as their wanting increased, suggesting that sleep deprivation raises desire, but lowers behavioral output. Taken together these results demonstrate that the sipometer and associated ratings are reliable and useful measures of motivation to consume and reward value in humans. Participants were more motivated to obtain access to sweet beverages, especially when these were better liked than to obtain access to non-sweet beverages.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consummatory behavior; Liking wanting; Motivation; Reinforcing value; Reward

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28089706      PMCID: PMC5769686          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  55 in total

1.  The physiology of motivation.

Authors:  E STELLAR
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1954-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  Oral and postoral determinants of food reward.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-07

3.  Modified sham feeding of sweet solutions in women with anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  D A Klein; J E Schebendach; M Gershkovich; G P Smith; B T Walsh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-05-09

4.  Sleep restriction leads to increased activation of brain regions sensitive to food stimuli.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Andrew McReynolds; Zalak B Trivedi; Amy L Roberts; Melissa Sy; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Sip size of orangeade: effects on intake and sensory-specific satiation.

Authors:  Pascalle L G Weijzen; Paul A M Smeets; Cees de Graaf
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.718

6.  Effects of food deprivation on goal-directed behavior, spontaneous locomotion, and c-Fos immunoreactivity in the amygdala.

Authors:  J M Moscarello; O Ben-Shahar; A Ettenberg
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Sleep restriction increases the neuronal response to unhealthy food in normal-weight individuals.

Authors:  M-P St-Onge; S Wolfe; M Sy; A Shechter; J Hirsch
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  Effects of neuropeptide Y, insulin, 2-deoxyglucose, and food deprivation on food-motivated behavior.

Authors:  D C Jewett; J Cleary; A S Levine; D W Schaal; T Thompson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Can the reinforcing value of food be measured in bulimia nervosa?

Authors:  Janet Schebendach; Allegra Broft; Richard W Foltin; B Timothy Walsh
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Short sleep duration is associated with reduced leptin, elevated ghrelin, and increased body mass index.

Authors:  Shahrad Taheri; Ling Lin; Diane Austin; Terry Young; Emmanuel Mignot
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-01-02

2.  Pharmacological studies of effort-related decision making using mouse touchscreen procedures: effects of dopamine antagonism do not resemble reinforcer devaluation by removal of food restriction.

Authors:  Jen-Hau Yang; Rose E Presby; Adam A Jarvie; Renee A Rotolo; R Holly Fitch; Mercè Correa; John D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Progressive ratio (PR) schedules and the sipometer: Do they measure wanting, liking, and/or reward? A tribute to Anthony Sclafani and Karen Ackroff.

Authors:  H R Kissileff; M Herzog
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Burst-pause criterion derivation for drinkometer measurements of ingestive behavior.

Authors:  Michele Serra; Bálint File; Daniela Alceste; Ivana Raguz; Daniel Gero; Andreas Thalheimer; Jeannette Widmer; Aiman Ismaeil; Robert E Steinert; Alan C Spector; Marco Bueter
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2022-05-11

5.  Preoperative liking and wanting for sweet beverages as predictors of body weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Claudio E Perez-Leighton; Jeon D Hamm; Ari Shechter; Shoran Tamura; Blandine Laferrère; Jeanine Albu; Danielle Greenberg; Harry R Kissileff
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Relationship between Sleep and Hedonic Appetite in Shift Workers.

Authors:  Parisa Vidafar; Sean W Cain; Ari Shechter
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  The Universal Eating Monitor (UEM): objective assessment of food intake behavior in the laboratory setting.

Authors:  Harry R Kissileff
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 5.551

8.  Microstructural changes in human ingestive behavior after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass during liquid meals.

Authors:  Daniel Gero; Bálint File; Daniela Alceste; Lukas D Frick; Michele Serra; Aiman Em Ismaeil; Robert E Steinert; Alan C Spector; Marco Bueter
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2021-08-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.