Literature DB >> 18769969

Enterprise-wide implementation of digital radiography in oral and maxillofacial imaging: the University of Florida Dentistry System.

Madhu K Nair1, James C Pettigrew, Jeffrey S Loomis, Robert E Bates, Stephen Kostewicz, Boyd Robinson, Jean Sweitzer, Teresa A Dolan.   

Abstract

The implementation of digital radiography in dentistry in a large healthcare enterprise setting is discussed. A distinct need for a dedicated dental picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) exists for seamless integration of different vendor products across the system. Complex issues are contended with as each clinical department migrated to a digital environment with unique needs and workflow patterns. The University of Florida has had a dental PACS installed over 2 years ago. This paper describes the process of conversion from film-based imaging from the planning stages through clinical implementation. Dentistry poses many unique challenges as it strives to achieve better integration with systems primarily designed for imaging; however, the technical requirements for high-resolution image capture in dentistry far exceed those in medicine, as most routine dental diagnostic tasks are challenging. The significance of specification, evaluation, vendor selection, installation, trial runs, training, and phased clinical implementation is emphasized.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18769969      PMCID: PMC3043692          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-008-9149-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  9 in total

1.  An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution.

Authors:  K Araki; A Endo; T Okano
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Impact of ambient lighting intensity and duration on the signal-to-noise ratio of images from photostimulable phosphor plates processed using DenOptix and ScanX systems.

Authors:  R Ramamurthy; C F Canning; J P Scheetz; A G Farman
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  A comparison of 18 different x-ray detectors currently used in dentistry.

Authors:  Allan G Farman; Taeko T Farman
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2005-04

4.  Applying DICOM to dentistry.

Authors:  Allan G Farman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Time and motion study: a comparison of two photostimulable phosphor imaging systems used in dentistry.

Authors:  R Ramamurthy; C F Canning; J P Scheetz; A G Farman
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Influence of spatial resolution and bit depth on detection of small caries lesions with digital receptors.

Authors:  Ann Wenzel; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Erik Gotfredsen
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2006-08-02

7.  Work flow redesign: the key to success when using PACS. 2002.

Authors:  Eliot L Siegel; Bruce Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Making filmless radiology work.

Authors:  E L Siegel; J N Diaconis; S Pomerantz; R Allman; B Briscoe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.

Authors:  H Hintze; A Wenzel; M Frydenberg
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.419

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Digital DICOM in Dentistry.

Authors:  Jeff Burgess
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-07-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.