Literature DB >> 10808219

An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution.

K Araki1, A Endo, T Okano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the sensitometric properties and resolution of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
METHODS: Three CCD-based systems were evaluated, RVG-4 (Trophy Radiologic, Paris, France) CDR (Schick Technologies Inc, Long Island, NY, USA) and Dixel (Morita, Kyoto, Japan) and a photostimulable phosphor system (Digora, Soredex-Orion, Helsinki, Finland). The sensitometric properties were determined by measuring the gray levels at increasing exposures without making any gray-scale adjustments. MTF was measured using images of a 10 microns width slit inclined to the long and short axes of the detectors.
RESULTS: The CCD-based systems showed a linear relationship between exposure and gray level although there were some differences in sensitivity. In RVG-4, the gray level saturated at a lower exposure. Digora showed a logarithmic relationship at uniform exposure. However, there was a linear relationship when it was exposed below the calibration dose. The MTF was highest with RVG-4 and the lowest with the Digora.
CONCLUSIONS: Each system has its own specific properties; RVG-4 has the highest resolution with the narrowest latitude, whereas Digora has the wider latitude but the lowest resolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10808219     DOI: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  5 in total

1.  A comprehensive in vitro study of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Part 2: the influence of intra-oral image receptor on periodontal measurements.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Hilde Bosmans; Jie Yang; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Reinhilde Jacobs; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Enterprise-wide implementation of digital radiography in oral and maxillofacial imaging: the University of Florida Dentistry System.

Authors:  Madhu K Nair; James C Pettigrew; Jeffrey S Loomis; Robert E Bates; Stephen Kostewicz; Boyd Robinson; Jean Sweitzer; Teresa A Dolan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Effect of beam quality and readout direction in the edge profile on the modulation transfer function of photostimulable phosphor systems via the edge method.

Authors:  Shinya Takarabe; Taku Kuramoto; Yusuke Shibayama; Hiroki Tsuru; Masato Tatsumi; Toyoyuki Kato; Kazutoshi Okamura; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-07-20

5.  Effect of differences in pixel size on image characteristics of digital intraoral radiographic systems: a physical and visual evaluation.

Authors:  Taku Kuramoto; Shinya Takarabe; Kazutoshi Okamura; Kenshi Shiotsuki; Yusuke Shibayama; Hiroki Tsuru; Hiroshi Akamine; Masato Tatsumi; Toyoyuki Kato; Junji Morishita; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.419

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.