Literature DB >> 18767736

Synergistic blends of monoterpenes for aggregation pheromones of the mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).

John H Borden1, Deepa S Pureswaran, Jean Pierre Lafontaine.   

Abstract

The superiority of the host monoterpene myrcene as a synergist for trans-verbenol and exo-brevicomin, aggregation pheromone components of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), suggests that the ancestral host of the mountain pine beetle is a pine rich in myrcene. A field trapping experiment in British Columbia testing reconstituted bole oleoresin of whitebark pine, Pinus albicaulis Engelmann, composed of mainly myrcene (20.7%), terpinolene (6.8%), and 3-carene (61.9%) showed it to be a better pheromone synergist than reconstituted bole oleoresin of lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta variety latifolia Engelmann, which contained only 2.7, 1.0, and 6.0%, respectively, of the above-mentioned three compounds. In the same experiment myrcene alone was the best synergist. In subsequent experiments, testing myrcene, terpinolene and 3-carene alone and in all possible binary and ternary combinations, a 50:50 blend of myrcene and terpinolene released at the same rate as either compound alone generally resulted in trap catches approximately 3 times higher than with myrcene as a synergist. This result held as long as the terpinolene was free of contaminants, and the traps were in the open, well away from potential interference of semiochemicals emitted by newly attacked trees. 3-Carene seemed to be inert or slightly inhibitory. No single monoterpene tested alone or in binary or ternary combination in the absence of pheromones was attractive. There was no effect of doubling or tripling the release rate of myrcene or terpinolene. In five of nine experiments, adding terpinolene to myrcene caused a significant increase in the percentage of female mountain pine beetles captured. Among host pines, the presence of highly synergistic monoterpenes at various levels in combination with other monoterpenes that are apparently either inert or inhibitory could account for different degrees of pheromone synergism, and thus host preference. The highly synergistic effect of combining myrcene plus terpinolene with the mountain pine beetle aggregation pheromone components opens up the potential for suppression of populations through semiochemical-based mass trapping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18767736     DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493(2008)101[1266:sbomfa]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  22 in total

1.  Fire injury reduces inducible defenses of lodgepole pine against Mountain pine beetle.

Authors:  Erinn N Powell; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Weathering the storm: how lodgepole pine trees survive mountain pine beetle outbreaks.

Authors:  Nadir Erbilgin; Jonathan A Cale; Altaf Hussain; Guncha Ishangulyyeva; Jennifer G Klutsch; Ahmed Najar; Shiyang Zhao
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Evidence for Semiochemical Divergence Between Sibling Bark Beetle Species: Dendroctonus brevicomis and Dendroctonus barberi.

Authors:  Brian T Sullivan; Amanda M Grady; Richard W Hofstetter; Deepa S Pureswaran; Cavell Brownie; Daniel Cluck; Tom W Coleman; Andrew Graves; Elizabeth Willhite; Lia Spiegel; Dwight Scarbrough; Andrew Orlemann; Gerardo Zúñiga
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 4.  Terpenes tell different tales at different scales: glimpses into the Chemical Ecology of conifer - bark beetle - microbial interactions.

Authors:  Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Temperature-driven range expansion of an irruptive insect heightened by weakly coevolved plant defenses.

Authors:  Kenneth F Raffa; Erinn N Powell; Philip A Townsend
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The lodgepole × jack pine hybrid zone in Alberta, Canada: a stepping stone for the mountain pine beetle on its journey East across the boreal forest?

Authors:  Inka Lusebrink; Nadir Erbilgin; Maya L Evenden
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Responses of bark beetle-associated bacteria to host monoterpenes and their relationship to insect life histories.

Authors:  Aaron S Adams; Celia K Boone; Jörg Bohlmann; Kenneth F Raffa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Effect of water stress and fungal inoculation on monoterpene emission from an historical and a new pine host of the mountain pine beetle.

Authors:  Inka Lusebrink; Maya L Evenden; F Guillaume Blanchet; Janice E K Cooke; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Genetic variation of lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta var. latifolia, chemical and physical defenses that affect mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae, attack and tree mortality.

Authors:  Daniel S Ott; Alvin D Yanchuk; Dezene P W Huber; Kimberly F Wallin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Volatiles of High-Elevation Five-Needle Pines: Chemical Signatures through Ratios and Insight into Insect and Pathogen Resistance.

Authors:  Justin B Runyon; Curtis A Gray; Michael J Jenkins
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.