Literature DB >> 18766112

Effect of tidal volume, sampling duration, and cardiac contractility on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation during positive-pressure ventilation.

Hyung Kook Kim1, Michael R Pinsky.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Both pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during intermittent positive-pressure ventilation predict preload responsiveness. However, because ventilatory and cardiac frequencies are not the same, increasing the number of breaths sampled may increase calculated pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation because larger (max) and smaller (min) pulse pressure and stroke volume may occur. Tidal volume and contractility may also alter pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation. We hypothesized that the magnitude of pulse pressure variation would increase with sampling duration, and that both tidal volume and contractility would independently alter pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation.
METHODS: In seven pentobarbital-anesthetized intact dogs arterial and left ventricular pressure (Millar) and left ventricular volume (Leycom) were measured over 8 intermittent positive-pressure ventilation breaths at tidal volume of 5, 10, 15, and 20 mL/kg (f = 20/min, 40% inspiratory time) under baseline, esmolol (2 mg/min), dobutamine infusions (5 microg/kg/min) and following volume loading (500 mL NaCl). Stroke volume variation was calculated using pulse contour method (PiCCO, Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany) averaged over 12 secs. Pulse pressure variation was calculated as 100 x (PPmax - PPmin)/PPmean and calculated over 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 breaths.
RESULTS: Pulse pressure variation increased progressively with increasing sampling duration up to but not exceeding five breaths. The effect on sampling duration was increased by greater tidal volume. Esmolol infusion decreased both pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation as compared with baseline (p < 0.05) at all tidal volume levels. However, dobutamine did not alter either pulse pressure variation or stroke volume variation.
CONCLUSION: Sampling duration, tidal volume, and beta-adrenergic blockade differentially alters pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during intermittent positive-pressure ventilation. Thus, separate validation is required to define threshold pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation values used to drive resuscitation algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18766112      PMCID: PMC2922911          DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181865aea

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  21 in total

1.  Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure.

Authors:  F Michard; S Boussat; D Chemla; N Anguel; A Mercat; Y Lecarpentier; C Richard; M R Pinsky; J L Teboul
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Functional hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-03-20       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Using ventilation-induced aortic pressure and flow variation to diagnose preload responsiveness.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Monitoring of respiratory variations of aortic blood flow velocity using esophageal Doppler.

Authors:  Michel Slama; Henri Masson; Jean-Louis Teboul; Marie-Luce Arnould; Rachida Nait-Kaoudjt; Bouchra Colas; Marcel Peltier; Christophe Tribouilloy; Dinko Susic; Edward Frohlich; Michel Andréjak
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Standard pulse contour methods are not applicable in animals.

Authors:  Jos R Jansen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Effect of positive pressure on venous return in volume-loaded cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  Paul C M van den Berg; Jos R C Jansen; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-03

8.  The static elastic properties of 45 human thoracic and 20 abdominal aortas in vitro and the parameters of a new model.

Authors:  G J Langewouters; K H Wesseling; W J Goedhard
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Flow patterns in cavae, pulmonary artery, pulmonary vein, and aorta in intact dogs.

Authors:  B C Morgan; F L Abel; G L Mullins; W G Guntheroth
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1966-04

10.  Instantaneous venous return curves in an intact canine preparation.

Authors:  M R Pinsky
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1984-03
View more
  27 in total

1.  The effects of vasoactive drugs on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in postoperative ventilated patients.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Hadian; Donald A Severyn; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.425

2.  Effect of tidal volume, intrathoracic pressure, and cardiac contractility on variations in pulse pressure, stroke volume, and intrathoracic blood volume.

Authors:  Jaume Mesquida; Hyung Kook Kim; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness in the beach chair position using dynamic preload indices.

Authors:  Su Hyun Lee; Yong-Min Chun; Young Jun Oh; Seokyung Shin; Sang Jun Park; Soo Young Kim; Yong Seon Choi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Influences of different vasopressors on stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation.

Authors:  Ran Kong; Yi Liu; Weidong Mi; Qiang Fu
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Pulse pressure variation and volume responsiveness during acutely increased pulmonary artery pressure: an experimental study.

Authors:  Fritz Daudel; David Tüller; Stefanie Krähenbühl; Stephan M Jakob; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Laurent Muller; Guillaume Louart; Philippe-Jean Bousquet; Damien Candela; Lana Zoric; Jean-Emmanuel de La Coussaye; Samir Jaber; Jean-Yves Lefrant
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Pulse pressure variations adjusted by alveolar driving pressure to assess fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Fabrice Vallée; Jean Christophe M Richard; Arnaud Mari; Thomas Gallas; Eric Arsac; Pascale Sanchez Verlaan; Benjamin Chousterman; Kamran Samii; Michèle Genestal; Olivier Fourcade
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-04-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Functional haemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.687

9.  Non-Invasive Venous waveform Analysis (NIVA) for monitoring blood loss in human blood donors and validation in a porcine hemorrhage model.

Authors:  Bret D Alvis; Reid McCallister; Monica Polcz; Jose Lucio O Lima; Jenna Helmer Sobey; Daniel R Brophy; Merrick Miles; Colleen Brophy; Kyle Hocking
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 9.452

10.  Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on the predictability of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.

Authors:  Yen-Huey Chen; Ying-Ju Lai; Ching-Ying Huang; Hui-Ling Lin; Chung-Chi Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.