Literature DB >> 31786067

Non-Invasive Venous waveform Analysis (NIVA) for monitoring blood loss in human blood donors and validation in a porcine hemorrhage model.

Bret D Alvis1, Reid McCallister2, Monica Polcz3, Jose Lucio O Lima4, Jenna Helmer Sobey5, Daniel R Brophy6, Merrick Miles7, Colleen Brophy8, Kyle Hocking9.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: There is an unmet need for a non-invasive approach to diagnose hemorrhage early, before changes in vital signs occur. Non-Invasive Venous waveform Analysis (NIVA) uses a unique physiological signal (the peripheral venous waveform) to assess intravascular volume. We hypothesized changes in the venous waveform would be observed with blood loss in healthy adult blood donors and characterized hemorrhage using invasive monitoring in a porcine model.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: American Red Cross donation center. PATIENTS: 50 human blood donors and 12 non-donating controls; 7 Yorkshire pigs.
INTERVENTIONS: A venous waveform capturing prototype (NIVA device) was secured to the volar aspect of the wrist in human subjects. A central venous catheter was used to obtain hemodynamic indices and venous waveforms were obtained using the prototype NIVA device over the saphenous vein during 400 mL of graded hemorrhage in a porcine model. MEASUREMENTS: Venous waveforms were transformed from the time to the frequency domain. The ratiometric power contributions of the cardiac frequencies were used to calculate a NIVA value representative of volume status. MAIN
RESULTS: A significant decrease in NIVA value was observed after 500 mL of whole blood donation (p < .05). A ROC curve for the ability of the NIVA to detect 500 mL of blood loss demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94. In the porcine model, change in NIVA value correlated linearly with blood loss and with changes in hemodynamic indices.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides proof-of-concept for a potential application of NIVA in detection of blood loss. NIVA represents a novel physiologic signal for detection of early blood loss that may be useful in early triage and perioperative management.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemorrhage; Monitoring; Venous; Venous waveform analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31786067      PMCID: PMC8171001          DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  30 in total

1.  Peripheral venous waveform analysis for detecting early hemorrhage: a pilot study.

Authors:  Bantayehu Sileshi; Kyle M Hocking; Richard B Boyer; Franz J Baudenbacher; Kelly L Kohurst; Colleen M Brophy; Susan Eagle
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  The Frank-Starling Curve Is Not Equivalent to the Fluid Responsiveness Curve.

Authors:  Ubbo Frank Wiersema; Shailesh Bihari
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Peripheral i.v. analysis (PIVA) of venous waveforms for volume assessment in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

Authors:  K M Hocking; B D Alvis; F Baudenbacher; R Boyer; C M Brophy; I Beer; S Eagle
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Undertriage Remains a Vexing Problem for Even the Most Highly Developed Trauma Systems: The Need for Innovations in Field Triage.

Authors:  Craig D Newgard; Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz; Adil H Haider
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Bedside assessment of intravascular volume status in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  A Hoeft; B Schorn; A Weyland; M Scholz; W Buhre; E Stepanek; S J Allen; H Sonntag
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 6.  Vital signs in hospital patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  D Evans; B Hodgkinson; J Berry
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 7.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Intensivist bedside ultrasound (INBU) for volume assessment in the intensive care unit: a pilot study.

Authors:  Brendan G Carr; Anthony J Dean; Worth W Everett; Bon S Ku; Dustin G Mark; Olugbenga Okusanya; Annamarie D Horan; Vicente H Gracias
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2007-09

9.  Alternative methods to central venous pressure for assessing volume status in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Lisa Stoneking; Lawrence A Deluca; Albert B Fiorello; Brendan Munzer; Nicola Baker; Kurt R Denninghoff
Journal:  J Emerg Nurs       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Peripheral Venous Waveform Analysis for Detecting Hemorrhage and Iatrogenic Volume Overload in a Porcine Model.

Authors:  Kyle M Hocking; Ban Sileshi; Franz J Baudenbacher; Richard B Boyer; Kelly L Kohorst; Colleen M Brophy; Susan S Eagle
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  6 in total

1.  Critical Information from High Fidelity Arterial and Venous Pressure Waveforms During Anesthesia and Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Lauren D Crimmins-Pierce; Gabriel P Bonvillain; Kaylee R Henry; Md Abul Hayat; Adria Abella Villafranca; Sam E Stephens; Hanna K Jensen; Joseph A Sanford; Jingxian Wu; Kevin W Sexton; Morten O Jensen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.495

2.  Noninvasive Venous Waveform Analysis Correlates With Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure and Predicts 30-Day Admission in Patients With Heart Failure Undergoing Right Heart Catheterization.

Authors:  Bret Alvis; Jessica Huston; Jeffery Schmeckpeper; Monica Polcz; Marisa Case; Rene Harder; Jonathan S Whitfield; Kendall G Spears; Meghan Breed; Lexie Vaughn; Colleen Brophy; Kyle M Hocking; Joann Lindenfeld
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 5.712

3.  Hemodynamic Parameters in the Assessment of Fluid Status in a Porcine Hemorrhage and Resuscitation Model.

Authors:  Eric S Wise; Kyle M Hocking; Monica E Polcz; Gregory J Beilman; Colleen M Brophy; Jenna H Sobey; Philip J Leisy; Roy K Kiberenge; Bret D Alvis
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Non-invasive venous waveform analysis (NIVA) for volume assessment in patients undergoing hemodialysis: an observational study.

Authors:  Bret D Alvis; Monica Polcz; Merrick Miles; Donald Wright; Mohammad Shwetar; Phil Leisy; Rachel Forbes; Rachel Fissell; Jon Whitfield; Susan Eagle; Colleen Brophy; Kyle Hocking
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 5.  Physiology and clinical utility of the peripheral venous waveform.

Authors:  Devin Chang; Philip J Leisy; Jenna H Sobey; Srijaya K Reddy; Colleen Brophy; Bret D Alvis; Kyle Hocking; Monica Polcz
Journal:  JRSM Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2020-10-28

6.  A brief report on the effects of vasoactive agents on peripheral venous waveforms in a porcine model.

Authors:  Monica Polcz; Kyle M Hocking; Devin Chang; Philip Leisy; Jenna H Sobey; Jessica Huston; Susan Eagle; Colleen Brophy; Bret D Alvis
Journal:  JRSM Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2020-08-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.