Literature DB >> 18756599

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go?

Ioannis Kehagias1, Stavros Nikolaos Karamanakos, Spyros Panagiotopoulos, Konstantinos Panagopoulos, Fotis Kalfarentzos.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 293 consecutive patients with acute appendicitis were studied. These comprised of 165 patients who underwent conventional appendectomy and 128 patients treated laparoscopically. The two groups were compared with respect to operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, complication rate and cost.
RESULTS: There were no statistical differences regarding patient characteristics between the two groups. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 2 patients (1.5%). Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a shorter hospital stay (2.2 d vs 3.1 d, P = 0.04), and lower incidence of wound infection (5.3% vs 12.8%, P = 0.03). However, in patients with complicated disease, intra-abdominal abscess formation was more common after laparoscopic appendectomy (5.3% vs 2.1%, P = 0.002). The operative time and analgesia requirements were similar in the two groups. The cost of treatment was higher by 370 EUR in the laparoscopic group.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy is as safe and efficient as open appendectomy, provided surgical experience and equipment are available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18756599      PMCID: PMC2739944          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.4909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  39 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Heng-Fu Lin; Jiann-Ming Wu; Li-Ming Tseng; Kuo-Hsin Chen; Shih-Horng Huang; I-Rue Lai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces length of stay for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  S Towfigh; F Chen; R Mason; N Katkhouda; L Chan; T Berne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Videolaparoscopic appendectomy: the current outlook.

Authors:  G C Roviaro; C Vergani; F Varoli; M Francese; R Caminiti; M Maciocco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The benefits of a dedicated minimally invasive surgery program to academic general surgery practice.

Authors:  Robert E Glasgow; Kathy A Adamson; Sean J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Laparoscopic versus standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector.

Authors:  Cláudio Bresciani; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Angelita Habr-Gama; Carlos Eduardo Jacob; Alberto Ozaki; Carlos Batagello; Igor Proscurshim; Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  S Sauerland; R Lefering; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

7.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients.

Authors:  R Hart; C Rajgopal; A Plewes; J Sweeney; W Davies; D Gray; B Taylor
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors.

Authors:  C G Ball; J B Kortbeek; A W Kirkpatrick; P Mitchell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group.

Authors:  A E Ortega; J G Hunter; J H Peters; L L Swanstrom; B Schirmer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  34 in total

1.  Wound healing after open appendectomies in adult patients: a prospective, randomised trial comparing two methods of wound closure.

Authors:  S Kotaluoto; S-L Pauniaho; M Helminen; H Kuokkanen; T Rantanen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendicectomy in Adults with Complicated Appendicitis: an Update of the Literature.

Authors:  Christos Athanasiou; Sonia Lockwood; Georgios A Markides
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  [Single-port access cholecystectomy : current status].

Authors:  T E Langwieler; M Back
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  Gaik S Quah; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in adults: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ahmed Talha; Hany El-Haddad; Abd-Elhamid Ghazal; Gihan Shehata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Acute appendicitis: should the laparoscopic approach be proposed as the gold standard? Six-year experience in an Emergency Surgery Unit.

Authors:  G Guercio; G Augello; L Licari; A Dafnomili; C Raspanti; N Bagarella; N Falco; G Rotolo; T Fontana; C Porello; G Gulotta
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

7.  Severe Complications of Laparoscopic and Conventional Appendectomy Reported to the Finnish Patient Insurance Centre.

Authors:  Sannamari Kotaluoto; Satu-Liisa K Pauniaho; Mika T Helminen; Juhani A Sand; Tuomo K Rantanen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  P Horvath; J Lange; R Bachmann; F Struller; A Königsrainer; M Zdichavsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiaohang Li; Jialin Zhang; Lixuan Sang; Wenliang Zhang; Zhiqiang Chu; Xin Li; Yongfeng Liu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Laparoscopic approach in perforated appendicitis: increased incidence of surgical site infection?

Authors:  R Galli; V Banz; H Fenner; J Metzger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.