Literature DB >> 15531241

The benefits of a dedicated minimally invasive surgery program to academic general surgery practice.

Robert E Glasgow1, Kathy A Adamson, Sean J Mulvihill.   

Abstract

In 2001, a dedicated minimally invasive surgery (MIS) program was established at a large university hospital. Changes included improvement and standardization of equipment and instruments, patient care protocols, standardized orders, and staff education. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of this program on an academic surgery practice. From January 1999 through October 2003, hospital and departmental databases were reviewed for all records pertaining to general surgery cases. Data trends were analyzed by regression analysis and are expressed as mean +/- SEM. In 1999, 15.0 +/- 0.1% of all general surgery cases were MIS cases compared with 30.2 +/- 0.1% in 2003 (P < 0.0001). During this period, the number of patients requiring conversion from a laparoscopic to an open approach decreased from 14.4% to 4.0% (P = 0.0007). In 1999, 30% of appendectomies were laparoscopic, compared with 92% in 2003 (P < 0.0001). This increase in the rate of laparoscopic appendectomy resulted in a decrease in average length of hospital stay for all patients with acute appendicitis, from 5.5 +/- 1.0 days in 1999 to 2.7 +/- 0.2 days in 2003 (P < 0.0001), and a decrease in total hospital cost per case, from 6569 +/- 400 US dollars in 1999 to 4819 +/- 175 US dollars in 2002 (P < 0.001). Total operating room time per case for cholecystectomy decreased from 131 +/- 3.7 to 108 +/- 3.2 minutes (P < 0.0001), and actual surgery time decreased from 95 +/- 4.1 to 74 +/- 4.0 minutes (P = 0.0006). Implementation of a dedicated MIS program resulted in a significant increase in the number of MIS cases and percentage of general surgery cases performed by MIS. This increase in the utilization of MIS resulted in reduced length of stay and cost and has been accompanied by improvements in operating room efficiency. Changes in practice associated with development of an MIS program have had measurable institutional benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15531241     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  8 in total

1.  The impact of a full-time director of minimally invasive surgery: clinical practice, education, and research.

Authors:  D L Fowler; N Hogle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites increase operating room efficiency.

Authors:  T A Kenyon; D R Urbach; J B Speer; B Waterman-Hukari; G F Foraker; P D Hansen; L L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A study of added costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on surgery preference cards.

Authors:  Jeff W Allen; Hiram C Polk
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: quality of care and benchmarking. Results of a single-institution specialized in laparoscopy compared with those of a nationwide study in Switzerland.

Authors:  B P Müller; F Holzinger; H Leepin; C Klaiber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Technical developments and a team approach leads to an improved outcome: lessons learnt implementing laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  Sorway W Chan; Chris Hensman; Bruce P Waxman; Stephen Blamey; John Cox; Ken Farrell; Jane Fox; John Gribbin; Laront Layani
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.872

6.  Cost and benefit of the trained laparoscopic team. A comparative study of a designated nursing team vs a nontrained team.

Authors:  T A Kenyon; M P Lenker; T W Bax; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The surgeon on call is a strong factor determining the use of a laparoscopic approach for appendectomy.

Authors:  P Cervini; L C Smith; D R Urbach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Effectiveness of the clinical pathway to decrease length of stay and cost for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  K Uchiyama; K Takifuji; M Tani; H Onishi; H Yamaue
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Development of a dedicated hepatopancreaticobiliary program in a university hospital system.

Authors:  Steven R Granger; Robert E Glasgow; Jean Battaglia; Ruey-Min Lee; Courtney Scaife; Dennis C Shrieve; David Avrin; Sean J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Intra-abdominal collections following laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: an experience of 516 consecutive cases at a district general hospital.

Authors:  Daniel G G Wilson; Amanda K Bond; Nikhil Ladwa; Muhammad S Sajid; Mirza K Baig; Parvinderpal Sains
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go?

Authors:  Ioannis Kehagias; Stavros Nikolaos Karamanakos; Spyros Panagiotopoulos; Konstantinos Panagopoulos; Fotis Kalfarentzos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  The role of endoscopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy: where do we stand in 2005?

Authors:  W B Bowne; C B Morgenthal; A E Castro; P Shah; G S Ferzli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  Improving operating efficiency with emphasis on prosthetic surgery.

Authors:  Neil Baum; David F Mobley; Paul Perito
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Surgical flow disturbances in dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites: an observational study to assess its supposed superiority over conventional suites.

Authors:  Mathijs D Blikkendaal; Sara R C Driessen; Sharon P Rodrigues; Johann P T Rhemrev; Maddy J G H Smeets; Jenny Dankelman; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  A systematic review of gallstone sigmoid ileus management.

Authors:  Nicholas Farkas; Vasha Kaur; Arun Shanmuganandan; John Black; Chantal Redon; Adam E Frampton; Nicholas West
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-01-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.