Literature DB >> 22669400

Wound healing after open appendectomies in adult patients: a prospective, randomised trial comparing two methods of wound closure.

S Kotaluoto1, S-L Pauniaho, M Helminen, H Kuokkanen, T Rantanen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The skin is closed in open appendectomy traditionally with few interrupted nonabsorbable sutures. The use of this old method is based on a suggestion that this technique decreases wound infections. In pediatric surgery, skin closure with running intradermal absorbable sutures has been found to be as safe as nonabsorbable sutures, even in complicated cases. Our purpose was to compare the safety of classic interrupted nonabsorbable skin closure to continuous intradermal absorbable sutures in appendectomy wounds in adult patients.
METHODS: A total of 206 adult patients with clinically suspected appendicitis were allocated to the study and prospectively randomized into two groups of wound closure: the interrupted nonabsorbable (NA) suture and the intradermal continuous absorbable (A) suture group. Primary wound healing was controlled on the first postoperative day, at 1 week clinically and after 2 weeks by means of a telephone interview. Follow-up data were obtained from 185 patients (90 in group NA and 95 in group A).
RESULTS: Continuous absorbable intradermal suturing was as safe as nonabsorbable sutures in regard to wound infections.
CONCLUSION: Continuous, absorbable sutures can be used safely even in complicated appendicectomies without increasing the risk of wound infection. Considering the benefits of absorbable suturing, we recommend this method in all open appendectomies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22669400     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1664-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  14 in total

1.  Skin closure during appendicectomy: a controlled clinical trial of subcuticular and interrupted transdermal suture techniques.

Authors:  O N Onwuanyi; I Evbuomwan
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1990-12

2.  Non-absorbable interrupted versus absorbable continuous skin closure in pediatric appendectomies.

Authors:  S L Pauniaho; T Lahdes-Vasama; M T Helminen; T Iber; E Mäkelä; O Pajulo
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.360

3.  Subcuticular suturing after appendicectomy.

Authors:  G E Foster; E G Hardy; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1977-05-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  [Status report on epidemiology of acute appendicitis].

Authors:  C Ohmann; C Franke; M Kraemer; Q Yang
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Cutaneous closure after cardiac operations: a controlled, randomized, prospective comparison of intradermal versus staple closures.

Authors:  R G Johnson; W E Cohn; R L Thurer; J R McCarthy; C A Sirois; R M Weintraub
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.

Authors:  A Hellberg; C Rudberg; E Kullman; L Enochsson; G Fenyö; H Graffner; B Hallerbäck; B Johansson; B Anderberg; J Wenner; I Ringqvist; S Sörensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Surgical and economic advantages of polyglycolic-acid suture material in skin closure.

Authors:  J V Glough; J Alexander-Williams
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-01-25       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go?

Authors:  Ioannis Kehagias; Stavros Nikolaos Karamanakos; Spyros Panagiotopoulos; Konstantinos Panagopoulos; Fotis Kalfarentzos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.

Authors:  Julie-Anne Rousseau; Karine Girard; Lucile Turcot-Lemay; Nancy Thomas
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicectomy.

Authors:  B R Andersen; F L Kallehave; H K Andersen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20
View more
  7 in total

1.  Systematic review of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures used for the closure of surgical incisions.

Authors:  Muhammad S Sajid; Malcolm R McFall; Pauline A Whitehouse; Parv S Sains
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-12-27

2.  Retrospective observational cohort study on cosmetic outcome of using Ti-Ni memory alloy wire for intradermal suture following mastectomy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Gang Li; Sida Qin; Xin Sun; Jiansheng Wang; Yunfeng Zhang; Jia Zhang; Jing Zhang; Shou-Ching Tang; Hong Ren
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Continuous absorbable intradermal sutures yield better cosmetic results than nonabsorbable interrupted sutures in open appendectomy wounds: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Anne Koskela; Sannamari Kotaluoto; Ilkka Kaartinen; Satu-Liisa Pauniaho; Tuomo Rantanen; Hannu Kuokkanen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Intradermal absorbable sutures to close pilonidal sinus wounds: a safe closure method?

Authors:  Marco Milone; Mario Musella; Paola Maietta; Paolo Bianco; Caterina Taffuri; Giuseppe Salvatore; Francesco Milone
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.

Authors:  Saori Goto; Takashi Sakamoto; Riki Ganeko; Koya Hida; Toshi A Furukawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-09

6.  Drainage tube hole suture improvement: Removal-free stitches.

Authors:  Rui Fu; Jia-Tao Zhang; Song Dong; Ying Chen; Chao Zhang; Wen-Fang Tang; Jin Xia; Qiang Nie; Wen-Zhao Zhong
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  The Japan Society for Surgical Infection: guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of gastroenterological surgical site infection, 2018.

Authors:  Hiroki Ohge; Toshihiko Mayumi; Seiji Haji; Yuichi Kitagawa; Masahiro Kobayashi; Motomu Kobayashi; Toru Mizuguchi; Yasuhiko Mohri; Fumie Sakamoto; Junzo Shimizu; Katsunori Suzuki; Motoi Uchino; Chizuru Yamashita; Masahiro Yoshida; Koichi Hirata; Yoshinobu Sumiyama; Shinya Kusachi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.549

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.