Literature DB >> 8956810

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients.

R Hart1, C Rajgopal, A Plewes, J Sweeney, W Davies, D Gray, B Taylor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA) in the treatment of acute appendicitis.
DESIGN: A prospective randomized trial.
SETTING: A university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Eighty-one patients with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis were prospectively randomized to undergo either LA or OA. The two groups were matched for age and sex.
INTERVENTIONS: LA or OA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of days in hospital and time to full recovery.
RESULTS: The mean hospital stay for LA was 3.23 days compared with 3.03 days for OA (p < 0.001). The mean number of narcotic injections required for patients in the LA group was 4.05 compared with 5.58 for patients in the OA group (p < 0.001). The mean time to complete recovery for patients in the LA group was 9.0 days compared with 16.2 days for patients in the OA group (p < 0.001). The mean operative time for LA was 73.8 minutes compared with 45.0 minutes for OA (p < 0.001). Three patients in the LA group had intra-abdominal abscesses (p > 0.25). No significant difference in wound infection rates was demonstrated (p > 0.05). Similarly, pain scores at 7 and 28 days showed no significant difference (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: With LA significantly fewer narcotic injections are required and there is a more rapid return to normal activities. LA takes longer to perform and was associated with three intra-abdominal abscesses. In cases of simple acute appendicitis the hospital stay for LA is significantly shorter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8956810      PMCID: PMC3949900     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  21 in total

1.  Intraabdominal abscess following open and laparoscopic appendectomy in the pediatric population.

Authors:  R McKinlay; S Neeleman; R Klein; K Stevens; J Greenfeld; M Ghory; C Cosentino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Cost perspectives of laparoscopic and open appendectomy.

Authors:  D E Moore; T Speroff; E Grogan; B Poulose; M D Holzman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Early laparoscopy as a routine procedure in the management of acute abdominal pain: a review of 1,320 patients.

Authors:  V Golash; P D Willson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review.

Authors:  M Kapischke; A Caliebe; J Tepel; T Schulz; J Hedderich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Complicated appendicitis: laparoscopic or conventional surgery?

Authors:  Boris Kirshtein; Michael Bayme; Sergey Domchik; Solly Mizrahi; Leonid Lantsberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Recent experience with laparoscopic appendectomy in a Canadian teaching centre.

Authors:  Abdullah Ali; Michael A J Moser
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Videolaparoscopic appendectomy: the current outlook.

Authors:  G C Roviaro; C Vergani; F Varoli; M Francese; R Caminiti; M Maciocco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Efficacy of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy for appendicitis: a four-year experience at a single center.

Authors:  Noriaki Koizumi; Hiroki Kobayashi; Yuen Nakase; Tsuyoshi Takagi; Kanehisa Fukumoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 9.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiaohang Li; Jialin Zhang; Lixuan Sang; Wenliang Zhang; Zhiqiang Chu; Xin Li; Yongfeng Liu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy is associated with a lower complication rate even during the introductory phase.

Authors:  Matthias Kapischke; Juergen Tepel; Klaus Bley
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.