Literature DB >> 23443482

Laparoscopic approach in perforated appendicitis: increased incidence of surgical site infection?

R Galli1, V Banz, H Fenner, J Metzger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopy in the setting of perforated appendicitis remains controversial. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the early postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) compared to open appendectomy (OA) in patients with perforated appendicitis.
METHODS: A total of 1,032 patients required an appendectomy between January 2005 and December 2009. Among these patients, 169 presented with perforated appendicitis. Operation times, length of hospital stay, overall complication rates within 30 days, and surgical site infection (SSI) rates were analyzed.
RESULTS: Out of the 169 evaluated patients, 106 required LA and 63 OA. Although operation times were similar in both groups (92 ± 31 min for LA vs. 98 ± 45 for OA, p = 0.338), length of hospital stay was shorter in the LA group (6.9 ± 3.8 days vs. 11.5 ± 9.2, p < 0.001). Overall complication rates were significantly lower in the LA group (32.1 vs. 52.4 %, p < 0.001), as were incisional SSI (1.9 vs. 22.2 %, p < 0.001). Organ/space SSI rates were similar in both groups (23.6 % after LA vs. 20.6 % after OA, p = 0.657).
CONCLUSIONS: For perforated appendicitis, LA results in a significantly shorter hospital stay, fewer overall postoperative complications, and fewer wound infections compared to OA. Organ/space SSI rates were similar for both procedures. LA provides a safe option for treating patients with perforated appendicitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23443482     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2858-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Heng-Fu Lin; Jiann-Ming Wu; Li-Ming Tseng; Kuo-Hsin Chen; Shih-Horng Huang; I-Rue Lai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Acute appendicitis.

Authors:  D J Humes; J Simpson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-09

3.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in complicated appendicitis: a review of the NSQIP database.

Authors:  Karleena Regina-Marie Tuggle; Gezzer Ortega; Oluwaseyi B Bolorunduro; Tolulope A Oyetunji; Richard Alexander; Patricia L Turner; David C Chang; Edward E Cornwell; Terrence M Fullum
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  A J Mangram; T C Horan; M L Pearson; L C Silver; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 5.  [Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].

Authors:  A Cariati; E Brignole; E Tonelli; M Filippi; F Guasone; A De Negri; L Novello; C Risso; A Noceti; M Giberto; R Giua
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2001-10

6.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Bo Wei; Cui-Lling Qi; Tu-Feng Chen; Zong-Heng Zheng; Jiang-Long Huang; Bao-Guang Hu; Hong-Bo Wei
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.

Authors:  Naveen Pokala; S Sadhasivam; R P Kiran; V Parithivel
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go?

Authors:  Ioannis Kehagias; Stavros Nikolaos Karamanakos; Spyros Panagiotopoulos; Konstantinos Panagopoulos; Fotis Kalfarentzos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial.

Authors:  R C Ignacio; R Burke; D Spencer; C Bissell; C Dorsainvil; P A Lucha
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis in adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yoshiro Taguchi; Shunichiro Komatsu; Eiji Sakamoto; Shinji Norimizu; Yuji Shingu; Hiroshi Hasegawa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendicectomy in Adults with Complicated Appendicitis: an Update of the Literature.

Authors:  Christos Athanasiou; Sonia Lockwood; Georgios A Markides
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  Gaik S Quah; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in adults: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ahmed Talha; Hany El-Haddad; Abd-Elhamid Ghazal; Gihan Shehata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Risk Factors for Postoperative Intraabdominal Abscess.

Authors:  Francisco Schlottmann; Emmanuel E Sadava; M E Peña; Nicolás A Rotholtz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  The Impacts of Deep Surgical Site Infections on Readmissions, Length of Stay, and Costs: A Matched Case-Control Study Conducted in an Academic Hospital in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Abdul Khairul Rizki Purba; Christian F Luz; Riyanti R Wulandari; Ieneke van der Gun; Jan-Willem Dik; Alex W Friedrich; Maarten J Postma
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of delayed primary wound closure in contaminated abdominal wounds.

Authors:  Boonying Siribumrungwong; Pinit Noorit; Chumpon Wilasrusmee; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015.

Authors:  Ramon R Gorter; Hasan H Eker; Marguerite A W Gorter-Stam; Gabor S A Abis; Amish Acharya; Marjolein Ankersmit; Stavros A Antoniou; Simone Arolfo; Benjamin Babic; Luigi Boni; Marlieke Bruntink; Dieuwertje A van Dam; Barbara Defoort; Charlotte L Deijen; F Borja DeLacy; Peter Mnyh Go; Annelieke M K Harmsen; Rick S van den Helder; Florin Iordache; Johannes C F Ket; Filip E Muysoms; M Mahir Ozmen; Michail Papoulas; Michael Rhodes; Jennifer Straatman; Mark Tenhagen; Victor Turrado; Andras Vereczkei; Ramon Vilallonga; Jort D Deelder; Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.