| Literature DB >> 18752062 |
Katerina Papanikolaou1, Elena Paliokosta, Giorgos Houliaras, Sofia Vgenopoulou, Eleni Giouroukou, Artemios Pehlivanidis, Vlassis Tomaras, Ioannis Tsiantis.
Abstract
We studied the interrelationship between the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic (ADOS-G), the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) and DSM-IV clinical diagnosis, in a Greek sample of 77 children and adolescents, referred for the assessment of a possible pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) and presenting a wide range of cognitive abilities. The agreement of the ADOS-G and the ADI-R with the clinical diagnosis was estimated as satisfactory and moderate, respectively, while both instruments presented with excellent sensitivity for the diagnosis of autistic disorder along with satisfactory specificity. ADOS-G/ADI-R agreement was estimated as fair. Our results confirm the discriminant validity of ADI-R and ADOS-G in diagnosing pervasive developmental disorders in children and adolescents with a wide range of intellectual abilities.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18752062 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-008-0639-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Autism Dev Disord ISSN: 0162-3257