Literature DB >> 18712579

TKA sagittal alignment with navigation systems and conventional techniques vary only a few degrees.

Yukihide Minoda1, Akio Kobayashi, Hiroyoshi Iwaki, Hirotsugu Ohashi, Kunio Takaoka.   

Abstract

Navigation systems have been developed to achieve more reliable prosthetic alignment in TKAs. However, the component alignment in the sagittal plane is reportedly less reliable than in the coronal plane even with navigation systems. We measured and compared sagittal prosthetic alignments for TKAs with the conventional technique and three navigation approaches to establish reference frames, using radiographs of the entire lower extremity while standing. The sagittal alignments simulated on the radiographs with the conventional technique and navigation systems differed by a mean of 2 degrees to 4 degrees . Use of navigation systems resulted in a mean of 1 degrees to 4 degrees hyperextension between the femoral and tibial components and use of the conventional technique resulted in a mean of 1 degrees flexion. Use of different reference points on the distal femoral condyle for the navigation systems resulted in differences of as much as 3 degrees alignment in the sagittal plane. Although optimal prosthetic alignment for TKA in the sagittal plane is unknown, surgeons and technicians using navigation systems should be aware of this difference in the sagittal plane and the risk of hyperextension between the femoral and tibial components, which might be associated with osteolysis and anterior post-cam impingement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18712579      PMCID: PMC2650059          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0449-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  17 in total

1.  Tibial post impingement in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  John J Callaghan; Michael R O'Rourke; Devon D Goetz; Thomas P Schmalzried; Patricia A Campbell; Richard C Johnston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  How accurate is current TKR instrumentation?

Authors:  S David Stulberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system: application to evaluation of component position after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takashi Sato; Yoshio Koga; Go Omori
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Mismatch of current intramedullary nails with the anterior bow of the femur.

Authors:  Kenneth A Egol; Eric Y Chang; John Cvitkovic; Frederick J Kummer; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol).

Authors:  S K Chauhan; G W Clark; S Lloyd; R G Scott; W Breidahl; J M Sikorski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08

6.  Sagittal alignment of the lower extremity while standing in Japanese male.

Authors:  Yukihide Minoda; Akio Kobayashi; Hiroyoshi Iwaki; Ryo Sugama; Kentarou Iwakiri; Yoshinori Kadoya; Hirotsugu Ohashi; Kunio Takaoka
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement.

Authors:  R S Jeffery; R W Morris; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

8.  Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M H Oswald; R P Jakob; E Schneider; H M Hoogewoud
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis.

Authors:  R A Berger; H E Rubash; M J Seel; W H Thompson; L S Crossett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement.

Authors:  M Tew; W Waugh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1985-08
View more
  17 in total

1.  Increased flexion position of the femoral component reduces the flexion gap in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Georg Matziolis; Robert Hube; Carsten Perka; Doerte Matziolis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  How to read a postoperative knee replacement radiograph.

Authors:  Nawfal Al-Hadithy; Madhavan C Papanna; Sana Farooq; Yegappan Kalairajah
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Sagittal alignment of the lower extremity while standing in female.

Authors:  Ryo Sugama; Yukihide Minoda; Akio Kobayashi; Hiroyoshi Iwaki; Mitsuhiko Ikebuchi; Yusuke Hashimoto; Kunio Takaoka; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Femur bowing could be a risk factor for implant flexion in conventional total knee arthroplasty and notching in navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jae Han Ko; Chang Dong Han; Kyoo Ho Shin; Levis Nguku; Ick Hwan Yang; Woo Suk Lee; Kwang Il Kim; Kwan Kyu Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The risk of notching the anterior femoral cortex with the use of navigation systems in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yukihide Minoda; Akio Kobayashi; Hiroyoshi Iwaki; Ikebuchi Mitsuhiko; Yoshinori Kadoya; Hirotsugu Ohashi; Kunio Takaoka; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tilman Pfitzner; Matthew P Abdel; Philipp von Roth; Carsten Perka; Hagen Hommel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Song Zhao; Xiaochun Peng; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunari Ishida; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Nobuhiro Tsumura; Seiji Kubo; Atsushi Kitagawa; Takaaki Chin; Tetsuhiro Iguchi; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Bone-femoral component interface gap after sagittal mechanical axis alignment is filled with new bone after cementless total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shinichi Kuriyama; Katsufumi Hyakuna; Satoshi Inoue; Yasutsugu Kawai; Yasuyuki Tamaki; Hiromu Ito; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Radiographic Evaluation of Alignment Following Total Knee Arthroplasty - a Systematic Review. Part II.

Authors:  Bogdan Stefan Cretu; Calin Dragosloveanu; Serban Dragosloveanu; Stefan Cristea
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.