PURPOSE: To prove the sensitivity of dual-time-point imaging with 18F-flourodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) of the liver to evaluate possible changes in the tumor-to-background ratio considering an improved detection rate of liver lesions. PROCEDURES: Image acquisition for the first whole-body scan started at a mean time point of 69 min (55-110 min). The mean time interval between the injection of 18F-FDG and the second delayed scan was 100 min (85-166 min). RESULTS: Of 90 proven liver metastases in 34 patients, the first scan detected 53 (59%) liver lesions correctly, whereas in the second, delayed scan 81 (90%) lesions were diagnosed correctly (p<0.001). The mean Standardized uptake values in the first and second delayed scan were 6.59 g/ml versus 8.09 g/ml, respectively (p<0.001). Tumor-to-background ratio of the first and second delayed scan were 2.0 and 2.7, respectively (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Dual-time-point-imaging of the liver showed a significant increase of tumor-to-background ratio and hypermetabolic lesion diameter. Although, 30% of all verified liver lesions could only be detected in the second delayed scan 10% of all malignant liver lesions were missed with FDG-PET.
PURPOSE: To prove the sensitivity of dual-time-point imaging with 18F-flourodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) of the liver to evaluate possible changes in the tumor-to-background ratio considering an improved detection rate of liver lesions. PROCEDURES: Image acquisition for the first whole-body scan started at a mean time point of 69 min (55-110 min). The mean time interval between the injection of 18F-FDG and the second delayed scan was 100 min (85-166 min). RESULTS: Of 90 proven liver metastases in 34 patients, the first scan detected 53 (59%) liver lesions correctly, whereas in the second, delayed scan 81 (90%) lesions were diagnosed correctly (p<0.001). The mean Standardized uptake values in the first and second delayed scan were 6.59 g/ml versus 8.09 g/ml, respectively (p<0.001). Tumor-to-background ratio of the first and second delayed scan were 2.0 and 2.7, respectively (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Dual-time-point-imaging of the liver showed a significant increase of tumor-to-background ratio and hypermetabolic lesion diameter. Although, 30% of all verified liver lesions could only be detected in the second delayed scan 10% of all malignant liver lesions were missed with FDG-PET.
Authors: G Brix; S I Ziegler; M E Bellemann; J Doll; R Schosser; R Lucht; H Krieter; D Nosske; U Haberkorn Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Bal Sanghera; Wai Lup Wong; Martin A Lodge; Sharon Hain; David Stott; John Lowe; Catherine Lemon; Kate Goodchild; Michele Saunders Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Gang Cheng; Abass Alavi; Esther Lim; Thomas J Werner; Catherine V Del Bello; Scott R Akers Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Gitta Bleeker; Godelieve A M Tytgat; Judit A Adam; Huib N Caron; Leontien C M Kremer; Lotty Hooft; Elvira C van Dalen Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-09-29
Authors: Caecilia S Reiner; Paul Stolzmann; Lars Husmann; Irene A Burger; Martin W Hüllner; Niklaus G Schaefer; Paul M Schneider; Gustav K von Schulthess; Patrick Veit-Haibach Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 9.236