Literature DB >> 23361859

When should we recommend use of dual time-point and delayed time-point imaging techniques in FDG PET?

Gang Cheng1, Drew A Torigian, Hongming Zhuang, Abass Alavi.   

Abstract

FDG PET and PET/CT are now widely used in oncological imaging for tumor characterization, staging, restaging, and response evaluation. However, numerous benign etiologies may cause increased FDG uptake indistinguishable from that of malignancy. Multiple studies have shown that dual time-point imaging (DTPI) of FDG PET may be helpful in differentiating malignancy from benign processes. However, exceptions exist, and some studies have demonstrated significant overlap of FDG uptake patterns between benign and malignant lesions on delayed time-point images. In this review, we summarize our experience and opinions on the value of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging in oncology, with a review of the relevant literature. We believe that the major value of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging is the increased sensitivity due to continued clearance of background activity and continued FDG accumulation in malignant lesions, if the same diagnostic criteria (as in the initial standard single time-point imaging) are used. The specificity of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging depends on multiple factors, including the prevalence of malignancies, the patient population, and the cut-off values (either SUV or retention index) used to define a malignancy. Thus, DTPI and delayed time-point imaging would be more useful if performed for evaluation of lesions in regions with significant background activity clearance over time (such as the liver, the spleen, the mediastinum), and if used in the evaluation of the extent of tumor involvement rather than in the characterization of the nature of any specific lesion. Acute infectious and non-infectious inflammatory lesions remain as the major culprit for diminished diagnostic performance of these approaches (especially in tuberculosis-endemic regions). Tumor heterogeneity may also contribute to inconsistent performance of DTPI. The authors believe that selective use of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging will improve diagnostic accuracy and interpretation confidence in FDG PET imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23361859     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2343-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  93 in total

1.  Dual-time point positron emission tomography findings of benign mediastinal lymph nodes in a tuberculosis-endemic region.

Authors:  Dae-Weung Kim; Chang Guhn Kim
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  FDG PET/CT demonstrated rapid progression of mediastinal lymphadenopathy in sarcoidosis.

Authors:  Cheng-Yi Cheng; Wen-Sheng Huang; Daniel H Shen; Yu-Ming Fan; Hsian-Her Hsu; Shiou-Chi Cherng; Shih-Chun Lee
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.794

3.  Dual-phase FDG-PET: delayed acquisition improves hepatic detectability of pathological uptake.

Authors:  V Arena; A Skanjeti; R Casoni; A Douroukas; E Pelosi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  F-18 FDG PET-CT findings of intraperitoneal carbon particles-induced granulomas mimicking peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Seok Tae Lim; Hwan-Jeong Jeong; Dong Wook Kim; Chang-Yeul Yim; Myung-Hee Sohn
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.794

5.  [Dual-time point images of the liver with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in suspected recurrence from colorectal cancer].

Authors:  D Fuster; S Lafuente; X Setoain; I Navales; A Perissinotti; J Pavia; P Paredes; F Lomeña; F Pons
Journal:  Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 1.359

6.  18F-FDG PET of gliomas at delayed intervals: improved distinction between tumor and normal gray matter.

Authors:  Alexander M Spence; Mark Muzi; David A Mankoff; S Finbarr O'Sullivan; Jeanne M Link; Thomas K Lewellen; Barbara Lewellen; Pam Pham; Satoshi Minoshima; Kristin Swanson; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Comparison of early and delayed FDG PET for evaluation of biliary stricture.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Nishiyama; Yuka Yamamoto; Naruhide Kimura; Akihiro Miki; Yasuhiro Sasakawa; Hisao Wakabayashi; Motoomi Ohkawa
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.690

8.  Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis mimicking gallbladder carcinoma with a false-positive result on fluorodeoxyglucose PET.

Authors:  Isamu Makino; Takahiro Yamaguchi; Nariatsu Sato; Toshiaki Yasui; Ichiro Kita
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Increasing uptake time in FDG-PET: standardized uptake values in normal tissues at 1 versus 3 h.

Authors:  Bennett B Chin; Edward D Green; Timothy G Turkington; Thomas C Hawk; R Edward Coleman
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Optimum scanning protocol for FDG-PET evaluation of pulmonary malignancy.

Authors:  V J Lowe; D M DeLong; J M Hoffman; R E Coleman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  58 in total

1.  SUVmax of 2.5 should not be embraced as a magic threshold for separating benign from malignant lesions.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Gang Cheng; Marnix G E H Lam; Sandip Basu; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Imaging spectrum and pitfalls of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with tuberculosis.

Authors:  Kimiteru Ito; Miyako Morooka; Ryogo Minamimoto; Yoko Miyata; Momoko Okasaki; Kazuo Kubota
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Three-Hour Delayed Imaging Improves Assessment of Coronary 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET.

Authors:  Jacek Kwiecinski; Daniel S Berman; Sang-Eun Lee; Damini Dey; Sebastien Cadet; Martin L Lassen; Guido Germano; Maurits A Jansen; Marc R Dweck; David E Newby; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Mijin Yun; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Dual time-point FDG PET/CT and FDG uptake and related enzymes in lymphadenopathies: preliminary results.

Authors:  Sofie Bæk Christlieb; Casper Nørgaard Strandholdt; Birgitte Brinkmann Olsen; Karen Juul Mylam; Thomas Stauffer Larsen; Anne Lerberg Nielsen; Max Rohde; Oke Gerke; Karen Ege Olsen; Michael Boe Møller; Bjarne Winther Kristensen; Niels Abildgaard; Abass Alavi; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  [Multimodal imaging of breast cancer recurrence : Prospective intraindividual comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT, contrast-enhanced CT, and bone scintigraphy].

Authors:  M Avanesov; T Derlin
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Glucose-6-phosphatase Expression-Mediated [18F]FDG Efflux in Murine Inflammation and Cancer Models.

Authors:  Mi Jeong Kim; Chul-Hee Lee; Youngeun Lee; Hyewon Youn; Keon Wook Kang; JoonHo Kwon; Abass Alavi; Sean Carlin; Gi Jeong Cheon; June-Key Chung
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Dual-time point 18F-FDG PET/CT for the staging of oesophageal cancer: the best diagnostic performance by retention index for N-staging in non-calcified lymph nodes.

Authors:  Sohyun Park; Jin Chul Paeng; Chang Hyun Kang; Gi Jeong Cheon; Keon Wook Kang; June-Key Chung; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Quantitative and Visual Assessments toward Potential Sub-mSv or Ultrafast FDG PET Using High-Sensitivity TOF PET in PET/MRI.

Authors:  Spencer C Behr; Emma Bahroos; Randall A Hawkins; Lorenzo Nardo; Vahid Ravanfar; Emily V Capbarat; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Assessment of cell proliferation in renal cell carcinoma using dual-phase 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT.

Authors:  Rei Onishi; Masanori Noguchi; Hayato Kaida; Fukuko Moriya; Katsuaki Chikui; Seiji Kurata; Akihiko Kawahara; Masayoshi Kage; Masatoshi Ishibashi; Kei Matsuoka
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Digital vs. analog PET/CT: intra-subject comparison of the SUVmax in target lesions and reference regions.

Authors:  Francisco Fuentes-Ocampo; Diego Alfonso López-Mora; Albert Flotats; Gabriela Paillahueque; Valle Camacho; Joan Duch; Alejandro Fernández; Anna Domènech; Montserrat Estorch; Ignasi Carrió
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.