OBJECTIVES: To assess respiratory-gated (RG) positron emission tomography (PET) acquisition for patients with liver metastases during delayed PET/computed tomography (CT) scanning with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). METHODS: Nineteen patients with liver metastases who had undergone early whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT scans without the RG technique and delayed scans with the RG technique were retrospectively selected. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 41 liver lesions and the tumor-to-liver uptake ratios (TLRs) for these same lesions were compared among three data sets: early non-respiratory-gated (early non-RG) images, delayed non-respiratory-gated (delayed non-RG) images, and delayed respiratory-gated (delayed RG) images. In the delayed non-RG and delayed RG images, the improvements in the TLR, relative to the early non-RG images, were assessed according to lesion size. RESULTS: For liver lesions, the SUVmax of early non-RG, delayed non-RG, and delayed RG images were 6.58±2.34, 7.69±3.08, and 9.47±3.73, respectively. There were significant differences among the three images (P<0.01). The TLR of the delayed RG images was significantly higher than those of the early non-RG and delayed non-RG images (P<0.01). In the delayed RG images, the difference in the TLR improvement for lesions ≤10 mm in size was 15% higher than that for lesions >10 mm in size; in the delayed non-RG images, the difference in the TLR improvement for the same lesion categories was 6%. CONCLUSION: Delayed RG imaging improves the TLR, compared with early non-RG and delayed non-RG imaging, especially for small lesions. RG PET acquisition may be a promising protocol for assessing liver metastases on delayed PET/CT scans.
OBJECTIVES: To assess respiratory-gated (RG) positron emission tomography (PET) acquisition for patients with liver metastases during delayed PET/computed tomography (CT) scanning with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). METHODS: Nineteen patients with liver metastases who had undergone early whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT scans without the RG technique and delayed scans with the RG technique were retrospectively selected. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 41 liver lesions and the tumor-to-liver uptake ratios (TLRs) for these same lesions were compared among three data sets: early non-respiratory-gated (early non-RG) images, delayed non-respiratory-gated (delayed non-RG) images, and delayed respiratory-gated (delayed RG) images. In the delayed non-RG and delayed RG images, the improvements in the TLR, relative to the early non-RG images, were assessed according to lesion size. RESULTS: For liver lesions, the SUVmax of early non-RG, delayed non-RG, and delayed RG images were 6.58±2.34, 7.69±3.08, and 9.47±3.73, respectively. There were significant differences among the three images (P<0.01). The TLR of the delayed RG images was significantly higher than those of the early non-RG and delayed non-RG images (P<0.01). In the delayed RG images, the difference in the TLR improvement for lesions ≤10 mm in size was 15% higher than that for lesions >10 mm in size; in the delayed non-RG images, the difference in the TLR improvement for the same lesion categories was 6%. CONCLUSION: Delayed RG imaging improves the TLR, compared with early non-RG and delayed non-RG imaging, especially for small lesions. RG PET acquisition may be a promising protocol for assessing liver metastases on delayed PET/CT scans.
Authors: Sangtae Ahn; Steven G Ross; Evren Asma; Jun Miao; Xiao Jin; Lishui Cheng; Scott D Wollenweber; Ravindra M Manjeshwar Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Bert-Ram Sah; Paul Stolzmann; Gaspar Delso; Scott D Wollenweber; Martin Hüllner; Yahya A Hakami; Marcelo A Queiroz; Felipe de Galiza Barbosa; Gustav K von Schulthess; Carsten Pietsch; Patrick Veit-Haibach Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Ari Sacks; Patrick J Peller; Devaki S Surasi; Luke Chatburn; Gustavo Mercier; Rathan M Subramaniam Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Albert Dirisamer; Benjamin S Halpern; Wolfgang Schima; Martin Heinisch; Florian Wolf; Mohsen Beheshti; Franz Dirisamer; Michael Weber; Werner Langsteger Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2008-08-16 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: K Urata; S Kawasaki; H Matsunami; Y Hashikura; T Ikegami; S Ishizone; Y Momose; A Komiyama; M Makuuchi Journal: Hepatology Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 17.425