Literature DB >> 11483690

Quantification of [(18)F]FDG uptake in the normal liver using dynamic PET: impact and modeling of the dual hepatic blood supply.

G Brix1, S I Ziegler, M E Bellemann, J Doll, R Schosser, R Lucht, H Krieter, D Nosske, U Haberkorn.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: For quantification of hepatic [(18)F]FDG uptake, the dual blood supply to the liver must be considered. In contrast to the arterial input, however, the portal venous blood supply to the liver cannot be monitored directly by PET because of the inaccessibility of the portal vein on PET scans. In this study, we investigated whether the dual hepatic input can be predicted from the measurable arterial input. Moreover, we assessed the effect of different input models on the rate constants of the standard 3-compartment model describing regional uptake of FDG.
METHODS: Dynamic FDG PET scanning was performed on 5 foxhounds. Activity concentrations in blood from the aorta and the portal vein were measured simultaneously using external circuits. After image reconstruction, time--activity courses were determined from the aorta and the liver. The venous input was approximated by convolving the arterial input with a notional system function describing the dispersion of the arterial input on its way through the gastrointestinal tract. On the basis of these data, 5 different hepatic input models, which pertain to a single-input as well as a dual-input scenario, were statistically compared with regard to the adequacy of the model fits to liver data and to differences in the estimated rate constants.
RESULTS: Portal venous input to the liver could be approximated by convolving the arterial input function with a system function. From this function, a mean transit time of 25 s was computed for FDG to pass through the gastrointestinal tract. According to the statistical analysis, dual-input models were superior to their single-input counterparts. However, differences in the rate constants estimated for the 5 input models were in the same order as interindividual variations within the different model groups. For the dephosphorylation rate constant, a consistent value of 0.05 +/- 0.01 min(-1) was found.
CONCLUSION: Dual-input models proved to be superior to single-input models with respect to the adequacy of FDG model fits to normal liver data. However, the hepatic blood supply may be approximated by the arterial input function as well, especially for the evaluation of liver lesions mainly fed by the hepatic artery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11483690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  13 in total

1.  Dynamic PET of human liver inflammation: impact of kinetic modeling with optimization-derived dual-blood input function.

Authors:  Guobao Wang; Michael T Corwin; Kristin A Olson; Ramsey D Badawi; Souvik Sarkar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Kinetic metrics of 18F-FDG in normal human organs identified by systematic dynamic total-body positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Guobing Liu; Hongrong Xu; Pengcheng Hu; Hui Tan; Yiqiu Zhang; Haojun Yu; Xuening Li; Hongcheng Shi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Detection of hepatic metastases using dual-time-point FDG PET/CT scans in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeong Won Lee; Seok-Ki Kim; Sang Mi Lee; Seung Hwan Moon; Tae-Sung Kim
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Tracer input for kinetic modelling of liver physiology determined without sampling portal venous blood in pigs.

Authors:  Michael Winterdahl; Susanne Keiding; Michael Sørensen; Frank Viborg Mortensen; Aage Kristian Olsen Alstrup; Ole Lajord Munk
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Bringing physiology into PET of the liver.

Authors:  Susanne Keiding
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Short-time total-body dynamic PET imaging performance in quantifying the kinetic metrics of 18F-FDG in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Guobing Liu; Haojun Yu; Dai Shi; Pengcheng Hu; Yan Hu; Hui Tan; Yiqiu Zhang; Hongyan Yin; Hongcheng Shi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Structural and practical identifiability of dual-input kinetic modeling in dynamic PET of liver inflammation.

Authors:  Yang Zuo; Souvik Sarkar; Michael T Corwin; Kristin Olson; Ramsey D Badawi; Guobao Wang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Improved derivation of input function in dynamic mouse [18F]FDG PET using bladder radioactivity kinetics.

Authors:  Koon-Pong Wong; Xiaoli Zhang; Sung-Cheng Huang
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Kinetic analysis of FDG in rat liver: effect of dietary intervention on arterial and portal vein input.

Authors:  Sudheer D Rani; Samuel T Nemanich; Nicole Fettig; Kooresh I Shoghi
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  Dual-time-point FDG-PET/CT for the detection of hepatic metastases.

Authors:  Albert Dirisamer; Benjamin S Halpern; Wolfgang Schima; Martin Heinisch; Florian Wolf; Mohsen Beheshti; Franz Dirisamer; Michael Weber; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.