Guo-Chun Zha1, Jun-Ying Sun, Sheng-Jie Dong. 1. Orthopaedic Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China, 41049015@qq.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Anterior knee pain is a major cause of complaint in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing. The concept of improved patellar tracking and decreased retropatellar contact pressure for lateral retinacular release theoretically suggests that patients with lateral retinacular release in TKA would achieve a lower incidence of anterior knee pain when compared without lateral retinacular release. We sought to determine (1) whether those patients who received a routine lateral retinacular release in TKA would attain lower incidence of anterior knee pain as compared to patients who received TKA without lateral retinacular release and (2) whether lateral retinacular release would increase the lateral retinacular release-related complications. METHODS: A total of 148 patients who underwent TKA with the use of the Gemini MK II mobile bearing were randomized to receive either routine lateral retinacular release (intervention group) or not (control group). Patients were assessed by the visual analogue scale for anterior knee pain, the Knee Society clinical scoring system of knee score and function score, and patellar score for clinical function. Patients' satisfaction and lateral retinacular release-related complications were also evaluated. RESULTS: The overall incidence of anterior knee pain in the intervention group at 18 months follow-up was 5.6%, while that of the control group was 20.6% (p = 0.009). No statistical difference was detected between the two groups in terms of lateral retinacular release-related complications (n.s.), patients' satisfaction (n.s.), knee score (n.s.), function score (n.s.), and patellar score (n.s.) at 18 months follow-up. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that routine lateral retinacular release can reduce anterior knee pain and does not increase lateral retinacular release-related complications, in TKA with the use of the Gemini MK II mobile bearing without patellar resurfacing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level I.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Anterior knee pain is a major cause of complaint in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing. The concept of improved patellar tracking and decreased retropatellar contact pressure for lateral retinacular release theoretically suggests that patients with lateral retinacular release in TKA would achieve a lower incidence of anterior knee pain when compared without lateral retinacular release. We sought to determine (1) whether those patients who received a routine lateral retinacular release in TKA would attain lower incidence of anterior knee pain as compared to patients who received TKA without lateral retinacular release and (2) whether lateral retinacular release would increase the lateral retinacular release-related complications. METHODS: A total of 148 patients who underwent TKA with the use of the Gemini MK II mobile bearing were randomized to receive either routine lateral retinacular release (intervention group) or not (control group). Patients were assessed by the visual analogue scale for anterior knee pain, the Knee Society clinical scoring system of knee score and function score, and patellar score for clinical function. Patients' satisfaction and lateral retinacular release-related complications were also evaluated. RESULTS: The overall incidence of anterior knee pain in the intervention group at 18 months follow-up was 5.6%, while that of the control group was 20.6% (p = 0.009). No statistical difference was detected between the two groups in terms of lateral retinacular release-related complications (n.s.), patients' satisfaction (n.s.), knee score (n.s.), function score (n.s.), and patellar score (n.s.) at 18 months follow-up. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that routine lateral retinacular release can reduce anterior knee pain and does not increase lateral retinacular release-related complications, in TKA with the use of the Gemini MK II mobile bearing without patellar resurfacing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level I.
Authors: Jeffrey I Peretz; Kim R Driftmier; Douglas L Cerynik; Neil S Kumar; Norman A Johanson Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Constant A Busch; Benjamin J Shore; Rakesh Bhandari; Su Ganapathy; Steven J MacDonald; Robert B Bourne; Cecil H Rorabeck; Richard W McCalden Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Charles C Yang; Lee A McFadden; Douglas A Dennis; Raymond H Kim; Adrija Sharma Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2008-08-16 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Stefan J M Breugem; Inger N Sierevelt; Matthias U Schafroth; Leendert Blankevoort; Gerard R Schaap; C Niek van Dijk Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2008-06-04 Impact factor: 4.176