Literature DB >> 3361317

Patellofemoral functional results and complications with the posterior stabilized total condylar knee prosthesis.

P Aglietti1, R Buzzi, A Gaudenzi.   

Abstract

The authors reviewed 73 knee arthoplasties performed with the Posterior Stabilized Total Condylar prosthesis, with an average follow-up period of 5.5 years. The function of the patellofemoral articulation was specifically analyzed. Patients with documented or suspected tibiofemoral problems were excluded. Using the Hospital for Special Surgery knee rating system, 48 knees (66%) had excellent, 20 had good (27%), and 5 (7%) had fair results. Patients with unilateral disease were able to negotiate stairs and transfer normally in 64% and 100% of the cases, respectively. The most frequent patellofemoral problem was impingement (21%), but reoperation was needed in only one patient. Stress fracture of the patella and subluxation were rare. A medial tilt of the patella on the axial view had no apparent ill effect. The patella was lowered 12 mm on average as a consequence of the standard bone resection sequence and insertion of the tibial component. The patella was significantly lower in patients with impingement than in normal joints. Routine complete patellofemoral resurfacing is advised in total knee joint arthroplasty. Complications are infrequent with appropriate prosthetic design and due technical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3361317     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(88)80049-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  22 in total

1.  Comparison between two computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: gap-balancing versus measured resection technique.

Authors:  Domenico Tigani; G Sabbioni; R Ben Ayad; M Filanti; N Rani; N Del Piccolo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  [Patella position and patellofemoral osteoarthritis after unicompartmental arthroplasty].

Authors:  K Anagnostakos; O Lorbach; D Kohn; P Orth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Changes in knee kinematics reflect the articular geometry after arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anthony M J Bull; Oliver Kessler; Mahbub Alam; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Can we define envelope of laxity during navigated knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  K M Ghosh; A P Blain; L Longstaff; S Rushton; A A Amis; D J Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The geometry of the trochlear groove.

Authors:  Farhad Iranpour; Azhar M Merican; Wael Dandachli; Andrew A Amis; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Bicruciate retaining.

Authors:  Andrea Trecci
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

7.  Does patellofemoral geometry in TKA affect patellar position in mid-flexion?

Authors:  Mo Saffarini; Stefano Zaffagnini; Simone Bignozzi; Francesca Colle; Maurilio Marcacci; David Dejour
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Does patellar eversion in total knee arthroplasty cause patella baja?

Authors:  Vineet Sharma; Panagiotis G Tsailas; Aditya V Maheshwari; Amar S Ranawat; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The anterior surface of the femur as a new landmark for femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Simon Talbot; John Bartlett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Management of Painful Patellar Clunk and Crepitance: Results at a Mean Follow-Up of Five Years.

Authors:  J J Gholson; Devon D Goetz; Robert W Westermann; John Hart; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.