Literature DB >> 18708441

Polarity reversal lowers activation time during diastolic field stimulation of the rabbit ventricles: insights into mechanisms.

M M Maleckar1, M C Woods, V Y Sidorov, M R Holcomb, D N Mashburn, J P Wikswo, N A Trayanova.   

Abstract

To fully characterize the mechanisms of defibrillation, it is necessary to understand the response, within the three-dimensional (3D) volume of the ventricles, to shocks given in diastole. Studies that have examined diastolic responses conducted measurements on the epicardium or on a transmural surface of the left ventricular (LV) wall only. The goal of this study was to use optical imaging experiments and 3D bidomain simulations, including a model of optical mapping, to ascertain the shock-induced virtual electrode and activation patterns throughout the rabbit ventricles following diastolic shocks. We tested the hypothesis that the locations of shock-induced regions of hyperpolarization govern the different diastolic activation patterns for shocks of reversed polarity. In model and experiment, uniform-field monophasic shocks of reversed polarities (cathode over the right ventricle is RV-, reverse polarity is LV-) were applied to the ventricles in diastole. Experiments and simulations revealed that RV- shocks resulted in longer activation times compared with LV- shocks of the same strength. 3D simulations demonstrated that RV- shocks induced a greater volume of hyperpolarization at shock end compared with LV- shocks; most of these hyperpolarized regions were located in the LV. The results of this study indicate that ventricular geometry plays an important role in both the location and size of the shock-induced virtual anodes that determine activation delay during the shock and subsequently affect shock-induced propagation. If regions of hyperpolarization that develop during the shock are sufficiently large, activation delay may persist until shock end.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18708441      PMCID: PMC2593523          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00706.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  31 in total

1.  Success and failure of biphasic shocks: results of bidomain simulations.

Authors:  C Anderson; N A Trayanova
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.144

2.  Virtual electrode polarization in the far field: implications for external defibrillation.

Authors:  I R Efimov; F Aguel; Y Cheng; B Wollenzier; N Trayanova
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Intramural virtual electrodes during defibrillation shocks in left ventricular wall assessed by optical mapping of membrane potential.

Authors:  Vladimir G Fast; Oleg F Sharifov; Eric R Cheek; Jonathan C Newton; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-08-20       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Photon scattering effects in optical mapping of propagation and arrhythmogenesis in the heart.

Authors:  Martin J Bishop; David J Gavaghan; Natalia A Trayanova; Blanca Rodriguez
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.438

5.  Evaluating intramural virtual electrodes in the myocardial wedge preparation: simulations of experimental conditions.

Authors:  G Plank; A Prassl; E Hofer; N A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  A high-voltage cardiac stimulator for field shocks of a whole heart in a bath.

Authors:  David N Mashburn; Stephen J Hinkson; Marcella C Woods; Jonathan M Gilligan; Mark R Holcomb; John P Wikswo
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.523

7.  Tunnel propagation of postshock activations as a hypothesis for fibrillation induction and isoelectric window.

Authors:  Takashi Ashihara; Jason Constantino; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Termination of spiral waves with biphasic shocks: role of virtual electrode polarization.

Authors:  C Anderson; N Trayanova; K Skouibine
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-12

9.  Success and failure of the defibrillation shock: insights from a simulation study.

Authors:  K Skouibine; N Trayanova; P Moore
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-07

10.  Direct evidence of the role of virtual electrode-induced phase singularity in success and failure of defibrillation.

Authors:  I R Efimov; Y Cheng; Y Yamanouchi; P J Tchou
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-08
View more
  11 in total

1.  Verification of cardiac tissue electrophysiology simulators using an N-version benchmark.

Authors:  Steven A Niederer; Eric Kerfoot; Alan P Benson; Miguel O Bernabeu; Olivier Bernus; Chris Bradley; Elizabeth M Cherry; Richard Clayton; Flavio H Fenton; Alan Garny; Elvio Heidenreich; Sander Land; Mary Maleckar; Pras Pathmanathan; Gernot Plank; José F Rodríguez; Ishani Roy; Frank B Sachse; Gunnar Seemann; Ola Skavhaug; Nic P Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Distribution of electromechanical delay in the heart: insights from a three-dimensional electromechanical model.

Authors:  V Gurev; J Constantino; J J Rice; N A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Probing field-induced tissue polarization using transillumination fluorescent imaging.

Authors:  Bryan J Caldwell; Marcel Wellner; Bogdan G Mitrea; Arkady M Pertsov; Christian W Zemlin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Continuous-waveform constant-current isolated physiological stimulator.

Authors:  Mark R Holcomb; Jack M Devine; Rene Harder; Veniamin Y Sidorov
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.523

5.  Diastolic field stimulation: the role of shock duration in epicardial activation and propagation.

Authors:  Marcella C Woods; Ilija Uzelac; Mark R Holcomb; John P Wikswo; Veniamin Y Sidorov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Atrial defibrillation voltage: falling to a new low.

Authors:  Natalia Trayanova
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Cardiovascular disease: several small shocks beat one big one.

Authors:  Richard A Gray; John P Wikswo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  New insights into defibrillation of the heart from realistic simulation studies.

Authors:  Natalia A Trayanova; Lukas J Rantner
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 9.  Computational rabbit models to investigate the initiation, perpetuation, and termination of ventricular arrhythmia.

Authors:  Hermenegild J Arevalo; Patrick M Boyle; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 3.667

10.  Low-energy control of electrical turbulence in the heart.

Authors:  Stefan Luther; Flavio H Fenton; Bruce G Kornreich; Amgad Squires; Philip Bittihn; Daniel Hornung; Markus Zabel; James Flanders; Andrea Gladuli; Luis Campoy; Elizabeth M Cherry; Gisa Luther; Gerd Hasenfuss; Valentin I Krinsky; Alain Pumir; Robert F Gilmour; Eberhard Bodenschatz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.