Literature DB >> 23870273

Diastolic field stimulation: the role of shock duration in epicardial activation and propagation.

Marcella C Woods1, Ilija Uzelac, Mark R Holcomb, John P Wikswo, Veniamin Y Sidorov.   

Abstract

Detailed knowledge of tissue response to both systolic and diastolic shock is critical for understanding defibrillation. Diastolic field stimulation has been much less studied than systolic stimulation, particularly regarding transient virtual anodes. Here we investigated high-voltage-induced polarization and activation patterns in response to strong diastolic shocks of various durations and of both polarities, and tested the hypothesis that the activation versus shock duration curve contains a local minimum for moderate shock durations, and it grows for short and long durations. We found that 0.1-0.2-ms shocks produced slow and heterogeneous activation. During 0.8-1 ms shocks, the activation was very fast and homogeneous. Further shock extension to 8 ms delayed activation from 1.55 ± 0.27 ms and 1.63 ± 0.21 ms at 0.8 ms shock to 2.32 ± 0.41 ms and 2.37 ± 0.3 ms (N = 7) for normal and opposite polarities, respectively. The traces from hyperpolarized regions during 3-8 ms shocks exhibited four different phases: beginning negative polarization, fast depolarization, slow depolarization, and after-shock increase in upstroke velocity. Thus, the shocks of >3 ms in duration created strong hyperpolarization associated with significant delay (P < 0.05) in activation compared with moderate shocks of 0.8 and 1 ms. This effect appears as a dip in the activation-versus-shock-duration curve.
Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23870273      PMCID: PMC3714876          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  45 in total

1.  Nonuniform responses of transmembrane potential during electric field stimulation of single cardiac cells.

Authors:  D K Cheng; L Tung; E A Sobie
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1999-07

2.  Effect of a bath on the epicardial transmembrane potential during internal defibrillation shocks.

Authors:  D C Latimer; B J Roth
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Near-threshold field stimulation: intramural versus surface activation.

Authors:  Christian W Zemlin; Sergey Mironov; Arkady M Pertsov
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 10.787

4.  Examination of stimulation mechanism and strength-interval curve in cardiac tissue.

Authors:  Veniamin Y Sidorov; Marcella C Woods; Petra Baudenbacher; Franz Baudenbacher
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Differential effects of cytochalasin D and 2,3 butanedione monoxime on isometric twitch force and transmembrane action potential in isolated ventricular muscle: implications for optical measurements of cardiac repolarization.

Authors:  M Biermann; M Rubart; A Moreno; J Wu; A Josiah-Durant; D P Zipes
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-12

6.  Spatial changes in the transmembrane potential during extracellular electric stimulation.

Authors:  X Zhou; S B Knisley; W M Smith; D Rollins; A E Pollard; R E Ideker
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1998-11-16       Impact factor: 17.367

7.  Optical action potential upstroke morphology reveals near-surface transmural propagation direction.

Authors:  Christopher J Hyatt; Sergey F Mironov; Frederick J Vetter; Christian W Zemlin; Arkady M Pertsov
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Experimental evidence of improved transthoracic defibrillation with electroporation-enhancing pulses.

Authors:  Robert A Malkin; Dongxu Guan; John P Wikswo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 9.  What have we learned from mathematical models of defibrillation and postshock arrhythmogenesis? Application of bidomain simulations.

Authors:  Natalia Trayanova; Gernot Plank; Blanca Rodríguez
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Inference of intramural wavefront orientation from optical recordings in realistic whole-heart models.

Authors:  Martin J Bishop; Blanca Rodriguez; Natalia Trayanova; David J Gavaghan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  1 in total

1.  Electrical Pacing of Cardiac Tissue Including Potassium Inward Rectification.

Authors:  Suran Galappaththige; Bradley J Roth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.