Literature DB >> 3157308

Prognostic significance of progression of coronary artery disease.

A Moise, M G Bourassa, P Théroux, Y Taeymans, A Pasternac, L Campeau, M A Bois, I Dyrda, P R David.   

Abstract

Angiographically documented coronary artery disease (CAD) can progress. Although progression itself is frequently recognized in patients who have undergone repeat cardiac catheterization, its prognostic significance remains unclear. To evaluate the influence of progression on survival, 313 patients with CAD who underwent catheterization twice (39 +/- 25 months apart) were followed for 3 to 129 months (mean 41 +/- 30) after the second angiogram. At the time of the second angiogram, 21, 91, 113 and 88 patients had 0-, 1-, 2- and 3-vessel CAD, respectively. The mean ejection fraction (EF) of the group was 55 +/- 13%. Progression was noted in 139 patients (44%). Of the 313 patients, 33 died and 39 had acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during follow-up. Four-year survival was estimated at 94% and 83% in the nonprogression and progression groups, respectively. Progression was predictive of survival by (univariate) long-rank test (p less than 0.01), but only EF (p less than 0.001), number of diseased vessels (p less than 0.01) and percent stenosis in the left main coronary artery (p less than 0.05) were independently significant by (multivariate) Cox regression analysis. Four-year survival without AMI was 89% and 73% in the nonprogression and progression groups, respectively. Progression was related to survival without AMI (p less than 0.001) by log-rank test. Cox regression analysis provided 3 independent predictors of survival without AMI: number of diseased vessels (p less than 0.01), progression (p less than 0.01), relative risk = 2.28) and EF (p less than 0.01). Results were similar when analyzing only the 39 AMIs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3157308     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90722-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  14 in total

1.  Functional parameters of the left ventricle: comparison of cardiac MRI and cardiac CT in a large population.

Authors:  A Palumbo; E Maffei; C Martini; G Messalli; S Seitun; R Malagò; A Aldrovandi; E Emiliano; A Cuttone; A Weustink; N Mollet; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Assessment of left ventricular myocardial function using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography.

Authors:  Martin Heuschmid; Julia K Rothfuss; Stephen Schroeder; Michael Fenchel; Norbert Stauder; Christof Burgstahler; Andreas Franow; Ronald S Kuzo; Axel Kuettner; Stephan Miller; Claus D Claussen; Andreas F Kopp
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-10-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Evaluation of global left ventricular function assessment by dual-source computed tomography compared with MRI.

Authors:  Pieter A van der Vleuten; Gonda J de Jonge; Daniël D Lubbers; René A Tio; Tineke P Willems; Matthijs Oudkerk; Felix Zijlstra
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Evaluation of global left ventricular function assessment of non-fluorescent electromechanical endocardial mapping compared with biplane left ventricular contrast angiography.

Authors:  E-S Tan; P A Van der Vleuten; G A J Jessurun; R A Tio; F Zijlstra; I C Van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 5.  Statin treatment and progression of atherosclerotic plaque burden.

Authors:  Diederick E Grobbee; Michiel L Bots
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  G S Roubin; A R Gruentzig
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1985

7.  Percutaneous coronary angioplasty: technique, indications, and results.

Authors:  G S Roubin; A R Gruentzig; W J Casarella
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  A new look at coronary angiograms: plaque morphology as a help to diagnosis and to evaluate outcome.

Authors:  J Lespérance; P Théroux; G Hudon; D Waters
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1994-06

9.  Novel approach to the interpretation of long-term "deterioration" in ejection fraction in individual patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R Lim; L Dyke; J Thomas; D S Dymond
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-09

10.  Comparison of MRI, 64-slice MDCT and DSCT in assessing functional cardiac parameters of a moving heart phantom.

Authors:  J M Groen; P A van der Vleuten; M J W Greuter; F Zijlstra; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.