Literature DB >> 18704412

One-stage cementless revision arthroplasty for infected hip replacements.

Jeong Joon Yoo1, Young Sam Kwon, Kyung-Hoi Koo, Kang Sup Yoon, Young-Min Kim, Hee Joong Kim.   

Abstract

We hypothesised that one-stage cementless revision hip arthroplasty may have advantages and a role in the treatment of selected patients with an infected hip replacement. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with an infected hip replacement treated with one-stage revision using cementless implants. Twelve patients were reviewed and followed up for at least three years (average: 7.2 years, range: 3.3-11.3 years) postoperatively. One recurrence of infection and one aseptic stem loosening were detected during follow-up. Grafted bone, which was used in eight patients, appeared to have united to host bone in all patients. The success rate of treatment was 83.3% when infection recurrence or component loosening were regarded as failure. One-stage revision hip arthroplasty using cementless implants appears to have a role in the treatment of carefully selected patients with an infected hip replacement if meticulous débridement is performed and appropriate antibiotics are properly used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18704412      PMCID: PMC2899141          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0640-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  [One stage revision of infected total hip replacements with replacement of bone loss by allografts. Study of 90 cases of which 46 used bone allografts].

Authors:  B Loty; M Postel; J Evrard; P Matron; J P Courpied; M Kerboull; B Tomeno
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Infection after total hip arthroplasty. Past, present, and future.

Authors:  K L Garvin; A D Hanssen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Two-stage cementless revision THR after infection. 5 recurrences in 40 cases followed 2.5-7 years.

Authors:  K A Lai; W J Shen; C Y Yang; R M Lin; C J Lin; I M Jou
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1996-08

4.  Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components.

Authors:  C A Engh; P Massin; K E Suthers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  One stage revision arthroplasty of the hip for deep gram negative infection.

Authors:  V V Raut; M S Orth; M C Orth; P D Siney; B M Wroblewski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  One-stage revision of total hip arthroplasty for deep infection. Long-term followup.

Authors:  V V Raut; P D Siney; B M Wroblewski
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study.

Authors:  W F Mulroy; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Deep-wound infection after total hip replacement under contemporary aseptic conditions.

Authors:  S F Schutzer; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Palacos gentamicin for the treatment of deep periprosthetic hip infections.

Authors:  K L Garvin; B G Evans; E A Salvati; B D Brause
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  A Laupacis; R Bourne; C Rorabeck; D Feeny; C Wong; P Tugwell; K Leslie; R Bullas
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Infection in total hip replacement: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Surendra Senthi; Jacob T Munro; Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  What are the risk factors for post-operative infection after hip hemiarthroplasty? Systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Thibaut Noailles; Kévin Brulefert; Antoine Chalopin; Pierre Marie Longis; François Gouin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Routine one-stage exchange for chronic infection after total hip replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Régis Lengert; Yann Diesinger; Jeannot Gaudias; Cyril Boeri; Jean-François Kempf
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  One-stage exchange with antibacterial hydrogel coated implants provides similar results to two-stage revision, without the coating, for the treatment of peri-prosthetic infection.

Authors:  Nicola Capuano; Nicola Logoluso; Enrico Gallazzi; Lorenzo Drago; Carlo Luca Romanò
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The Modular Universal Tumour And Revision System (MUTARS®) in endoprosthetic revision surgery.

Authors:  Carsten Gebert; Martin Wessling; Christian Götze; Georg Gosheger; Jendrik Hardes
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Evaluation and Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection-an International, Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Saseendar Shanmugasundaram; Benjamin F Ricciardi; Timothy W R Briggs; Patrick S Sussmann; Mathias P Bostrom
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-11-06

7.  Preformed gentamicin spacers in two-stage revision hip arthroplasty: functional results and complications.

Authors:  Christophe Pattyn; Thomas De Geest; Pieter Ackerman; Emmanuel Audenaert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Partial two-stage exchange for infected total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Timothy E Ekpo; Keith R Berend; Michael J Morris; Joanne B Adams; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Retention of the well-fixed implant in the single-stage exchange for chronic infected total hip arthroplasty: an average of five years of follow-up.

Authors:  Baochao Ji; Boyong Xu; Wentao Guo; Aili Rehei; Wenbo Mu; Desheng Yang; Li Cao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Outcome of one-stage cementless exchange for acute postoperative periprosthetic hip infection.

Authors:  Erik Hansen; Matthew Tetreault; Benjamin Zmistowski; Craig J Della Valle; Javad Parvizi; Fares S Haddad; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.