Literature DB >> 23852737

Partial two-stage exchange for infected total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report.

Timothy E Ekpo1, Keith R Berend, Michael J Morris, Joanne B Adams, Adolph V Lombardi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One common approach to the infected total hip arthroplasty (THA) calls for a staged revision, including removal of all components. However, removal of well-fixed femoral components can result in bone loss and compromised fixation; it is not known whether it is effective to leave a well-fixed femoral component in situ, remove only the acetabular component, débride thoroughly, place a spacer, and delay reimplantation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to determine (1) the frequency of infection recurrence; (2) the frequency of death; and (3) the Harris hip scores of patients treated with a "two-stage partial exchange" approach.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis from 2000 through January 2011 revealed 19 patients with infected THA treated with partial two-stage exchange including complete acetabular component removal, aggressive soft tissue débridement, retention of the well-fixed femoral stem, placement of an antibiotic-laden cement femoral head on the trunnion of the retained stem, postoperative course of antibiotics, and delayed reimplantation. Indications for this treatment included those patients whose femoral component was determined to be well fixed and its removal would result in significant femoral bone loss and compromise of future fixation. During the study period, this represented 7% (19 of 262) of the patients whom we treated for a chronically infected THA. Minimum followup was 2 years (mean, 4 years; range, 2-11 years). None of the 19 patients in this series were lost to followup. We defined failure as recurrence of infection in the same hip or the use of long-term suppressive antibiotics.
RESULTS: Two patients (11%), both with prior failure of two-staged treatment of infection, failed secondary to recurrence of infection at an average of 3.3 years. There were no patient deaths within 90 days. The mean Harris hip score was 68 (range, 31-100; best score is 100).
CONCLUSIONS: Insofar as 89% of patients in this series were clinically free of infection at a minimum of 2 years, we believe partial two-stage exchange may represent an acceptable option for patients with infected THA when femoral component removal would result in significant bone loss and compromise of reconstruction. Further study is required on this approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23852737      PMCID: PMC3890196          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3168-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  73 in total

1.  Infected total hip arthroplasty revision: one- or two-stage procedure?

Authors:  S Klouche; P Leonard; V Zeller; L Lhotellier; W Graff; P Leclerc; P Mamoudy; E Sariali
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.256

2.  Preservation of the original femoral cement mantle during the management of infected cemented total hip replacement by two-stage revision.

Authors:  J R Morley; S M Blake; M J W Hubble; A J Timperley; G A Gie; J R Howell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-03

3.  One stage revision arthroplasty of the hip for deep gram negative infection.

Authors:  V V Raut; M S Orth; M C Orth; P D Siney; B M Wroblewski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Preformed antibiotic-loaded cement spacers for two-stage revision of infected total hip arthroplasty. Long-term results.

Authors:  Carlo L Romanò; Delia Romanò; Alessandra Albisetti; Enzo Meani
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection does not preclude infection control.

Authors:  Ronald Huang; Chi-Chien Hu; Bahar Adeli; Javad Mortazavi; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Cementless two-staged total hip arthroplasty with a short term interval period for chronic deep periprosthetic infection. Technique and long-term results.

Authors:  Jochen Erhart; Karl Jaklitsch; Mark Schurz; Vilmos Vécsei; Reinhard Ehall
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  Two-stage cementless revision of late total hip arthroplasty infection using a premanufactured spacer.

Authors:  Daniel R P Neumann; Thomas Hofstaedter; Corina List; Ulrich Dorn
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Two-stage treatment of hip periprosthetic joint infection is associated with a high rate of infection control but high mortality.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Michael J Morris; Adam G Bergeson; Joanne B Adams; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Retaining well-fixed cementless stem in the treatment of infected hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Lee; Kee Haeng Lee; Jae-Hwi Nho; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Surgical procedures in the treatment of 784 infected THAs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Lars B Engesæter; Håvard Dale; Jan C Schrama; Geir Hallan; Stein Atle Lie
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  18 in total

1.  Two-stage revision of prosthetic hip joint infections using antibiotic-loaded cement spacers: When is the best time to perform the second stage?

Authors:  Ines Vielgut; Patrick Sadoghi; Matthias Wolf; Lukas Holzer; Andreas Leithner; Gerold Schwantzer; Rudolf Poolman; Bernhard Frankl; Mathias Glehr
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  CORR Insights®: Single-stage Acetabular Revision During Two-stage THA Revision for Infection is Effective in Selected Patients.

Authors:  Dror Lakstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Should well-fixed uncemented femoral components be revised in infected hip arthroplasty? Report of five trial cases.

Authors:  Kiyokazu Fukui; Ayumi Kaneuji; Syusuke Ueda; Tadami Matsumoto
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-01

4.  CORR Insights(®): The Role of Highly Selective Implant Retention in the Infected Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thoralf Randolph Liebs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Partial component-retained two-stage reconstruction for chronic infection after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: good or bad?

Authors:  Zuyun Yan; Rui Fang; Tang Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Partial component-retained two-stage reconstruction for chronic infection after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: results of sixteen cases after five years of follow-up.

Authors:  Kun-Hui Chen; Shang-Wen Tsai; Po-Kuei Wu; Cheng-Fong Chen; Hsin-Yi Wang; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Retention of the well-fixed implant in the single-stage exchange for chronic infected total hip arthroplasty: an average of five years of follow-up.

Authors:  Baochao Ji; Boyong Xu; Wentao Guo; Aili Rehei; Wenbo Mu; Desheng Yang; Li Cao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The Role of Highly Selective Implant Retention in the Infected Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Moataz El-Husseiny; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Hip and Knee Section, Treatment, Surgical Technique: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections.

Authors:  Moneer M Abouljoud; David Backstein; Andrew Battenberg; Matthew Dietz; Alejo Erice; Andrew A Freiberg; Jeffrey Granger; Adam Katchky; Anton Khlopas; Tae-Kyun Kim; Per Kjaersgaard-Andersen; Kyung-Hoi Koo; Yona Kosashvili; Percia Lazarovski; Jennifer Leighton; Adolph Lombardi; Konstantinos Malizos; Jorge Manrique; Michael A Mont; Marianthe Papanagiotoy; Rafael J Sierra; Nipun Sodhi; John Stammers; Maik Stiehler; Timothy L Tan; Katsufumi Uchiyama; Derek Ward; Anna Ziogkou
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Periprosthetic joint infection treated via bone cement and without the removal of hardware.

Authors:  Hasan Göçer; Nevzat Dabak
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.