Literature DB >> 1473885

[One stage revision of infected total hip replacements with replacement of bone loss by allografts. Study of 90 cases of which 46 used bone allografts].

B Loty1, M Postel, J Evrard, P Matron, J P Courpied, M Kerboull, B Tomeno.   

Abstract

We usually manage infected total hip replacements by a one stage revision. We have reviewed 90 cases operated on before 1988. Notable bone loss was frequently encountered and reconstructed using allografts. In all cases complete surgical debridement was performed and a cemented total hip replacement implanted. Bone allografts were used in 46 cases. Systemic antibiotics and antibiotic loaded cement were utilised. There were 17 failures (19%); one patient died soon after operation, there were 8 obvious infections (9%), 1 hip was thought to be infected although the prosthesis was not loose, and 7 femoral prostheses became loose of which 3 were due to mechanical failure and the remainder had no obvious explanation. Infection with staphylococcus aureus and pseudomonas had a statistical correlation with failure, but other factors including the preoperative status and the use of allografts did not appear to influence the result. Allograft femoral heads from the bone bank were found to be reliable for reconstruction of the acetabulum and small femoral defects. With major femoral bone loss we preferred massive irradiated cortical allografts. The quality of the bone reconstruction was probably the most important factor in the good functional results observed in 79% of cases. Effective surgical debridement and an appropriate antibiotic regime will allow a successful one stage revision procedure. The use of allografts gave a reliable reconstruction of the bone loss and was not associated with an increased rate of failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1473885     DOI: 10.1007/bf00189615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  18 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of infected joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  E Morscher; R Babst; H Jenny
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Two-stage reconstruction of a total hip arthroplasty because of infection.

Authors:  D J McDonald; R H Fitzgerald; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  [Repair of the acetabulum using a bone homograft preserved at the time of revision of total hip prostheses].

Authors:  C Hedde; M Postel; M Kerboul; J P Courpied
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1986

4.  Medical and surgical treatment of the septic hip with one-stage revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  G B Miley; A D Scheller; R H Turner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The results of reinsertion of a total hip prosthesis after sepsis.

Authors:  G A Hunter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1979-11

6.  Revision with gentamicin-impregnated cement for deep infections in total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  A S Carlsson; G Josefsson; L Lindberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Hip implant infection. Treatment with resection arthroplasty and late total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R H Fitzgerald; D R Jones
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1985-06-28       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Total hip replacement in the previously septic hip.

Authors:  D L Cherney; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Reimplantation in infection: a 12-year experience.

Authors:  E A Salvati; K M Chekofsky; B D Brause; P D Wilson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Management of deep infection of total hip replacement.

Authors:  H W Buchholz; R A Elson; E Engelbrecht; H Lodenkämper; J Röttger; A Siegel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1981
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  [Revision of tumour endoprostheses around the knee joint. Review and own results].

Authors:  R Windhager; A Leithner; M Hochegger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  What is the Long-term Economic Societal Effect of Periprosthetic Infections After THA? A Markov Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Parisi; Joseph F Konopka; Hany S Bedair
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Remission after treatment of osteoarticular infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa versus Staphylococcus aureus: a case-controlled study.

Authors:  Khalid Seghrouchni; Christian van Delden; Dennis Dominguez; Mohamed Benkabouche; Louis Bernard; Mathieu Assal; Pierre Hoffmeyer; Ilker Uçkay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  One-stage cementless revision arthroplasty for infected hip replacements.

Authors:  Jeong Joon Yoo; Young Sam Kwon; Kyung-Hoi Koo; Kang Sup Yoon; Young-Min Kim; Hee Joong Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  What is the evidence base to guide surgical treatment of infected hip prostheses? systematic review of longitudinal studies in unselected patients.

Authors:  Andrew D Beswick; Karen T Elvers; Alison J Smith; Rachael Gooberman-Hill; Andrew Lovering; Ashley W Blom
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Staged custom, intramedullary antibiotic spacers for severe segmental bone loss in infected total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Atul F Kamath; Okechukwu Anakwenze; Gwo-Chin Lee; Charles L Nelson
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-08-17

Review 7.  One-stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections.

Authors:  Manny Nguyen; Mohamed Sukeik; Akos Zahar; Ikram Nizam; Fares Sami Haddad
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-11-30

Review 8.  Systematic review of single stage revision for prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Zachary C Lum; Christopher Thomas Holland; John P Meehan
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2020-12-18

9.  Results and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) after One-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip: A Single-centre Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Jesse W P Kuiper; Christine M E Rustenburg; Jore H Willems; Steven J Verberne; Edgar J G Peters; Rachid Saouti
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2018-07-06

10.  One-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Fistulizing Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip: An Effective Strategy.

Authors:  Simon Marmor; Younes Kerroumi; Vanina Meyssonnier; Luc Lhotellier; Antoine Mouton; Wilfrid Graff; Valérie Zeller
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-10-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.