Literature DB >> 8792732

Two-stage cementless revision THR after infection. 5 recurrences in 40 cases followed 2.5-7 years.

K A Lai1, W J Shen, C Y Yang, R M Lin, C J Lin, I M Jou.   

Abstract

We revised 40 infected hip prostheses in 40 patients as a two-stage procedure, including intravenous and oral antibiotics, gentamicin beads, and delayed cementless implantation of porous-coated THR. The duration of antibiotic treatment was 8 weeks. The interval from resection to reimplantation was, on average, 48 (8-108) weeks. 39 patients were followed, on average, 4 (2.5-7) years. 5 patients had a recurrent infection. In patients who did not have a recurrent infection, the Harris hip score exceeded 80 in 32 patients. Radiographically, femoral component migration of 2-6 mm was noted in 3 cases. The recurrent infection rate, and the functional and radiographic results are comparable with those obtained using a two-stage procedure with antibiotic cement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8792732     DOI: 10.3109/17453679609002324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  17 in total

1.  Functional and Emotional Results Differ After Aseptic vs Septic Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Friedrich Boettner; Michael B Cross; Denis Nam; Tobias Kluthe; Miriam Schulte; Christian Goetze
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-06-11

2.  Partial two-stage exchange for infected total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Timothy E Ekpo; Keith R Berend; Michael J Morris; Joanne B Adams; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Midterm to long-term followup of staged reimplantation for infected hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Daniel J Berry; Arlen D Hanssen; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Treatment of infected hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; C-H Flouzat-Lachianette; R Jalil; Sobrinho Uirassu Batista; I Guissou; A Poignard
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-03-02

5.  One-stage cementless revision arthroplasty for infected hip replacements.

Authors:  Jeong Joon Yoo; Young Sam Kwon; Kyung-Hoi Koo; Kang Sup Yoon; Young-Min Kim; Hee Joong Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Two-stage cementless revision of infected hip endoprostheses.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Alexandra Grossmann; Martin Fuerst; Peter Schäfer; Lars Frommelt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Two-stage procedure in the treatment of late chronic hip infections--spacer implantation.

Authors:  Mohamed Sukeik; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 8.  Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  Rationale for one stage exchange of infected hip replacement using uncemented implants and antibiotic impregnated bone graft.

Authors:  Heinz Winkler
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Trabecular metal acetabular revision system (cup-cage construct) to address the massive acetabular defects in revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rajesh Malhotra; Ramprasad Kancherla; Vijay Kumar; Aditya Soral
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.