Literature DB >> 9772858

Maternal anthropometric factors and risk of primary cesarean delivery.

M J Shepard1, A F Saftlas, L Leo-Summers, M B Bracken.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined absolute and proportional gestational weight gain and prepregnancy body mass index as predictors of primary cesarean delivery.
METHODS: Data were derived from a prospective study of pregnancy outcome risk factors in 2301 women in greater New Haven, Conn, who had singleton deliveries by primary cesarean (n = 312) or vaginal delivery (n = 1989) and for whom height, prepregnancy weight, and weight gain were available. Women were divided into 4 body mass index groups (underweight, low average, high average, and obese) and further subdivided into 8 groups according to median proportional or absolute weight gain.
RESULTS: Risk of cesarean delivery increased with increasing body mass index and gestational weight gain greater than the median for one's body mass index. Proportional weight gain was more predictive of cesarean delivery than absolute weight gain. Underweight women gaining more than 27.8% of their prepregnancy weight had a 2-fold adjusted relative risk of cesarean delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: Proportional weight gain is an important predictor of cesarean delivery for underweight women; high body mass index is also predictive of increased risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9772858      PMCID: PMC1508477          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.10.1534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  18 in total

1.  The Preterm Prediction Study: association of cesarean delivery with increases in maternal weight and body mass index.

Authors:  B C Brost; R L Goldenberg; B M Mercer; J D Iams; P J Meis; A H Moawad; R B Newman; M Miodovnik; S N Caritis; G R Thurnau; S F Bottoms; A Das; D McNellis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Analysing the relationship between maternal weight gain and birthweight: exploration of four statistical issues.

Authors:  S Selvin; B Abrams
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.980

3.  Influence of maternal anthropometric status and birth weight on the risk of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  F R Witter; L E Caulfield; R J Stoltzfus
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Prepregnancy weight and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  S Cnattingius; R Bergström; L Lipworth; M S Kramer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Exposure to electromagnetic fields during pregnancy with emphasis on electrically heated beds: association with birthweight and intrauterine growth retardation.

Authors:  M B Bracken; K Belanger; K Hellenbrand; L Dlugosz; T R Holford; J E McSharry; K Addesso; B Leaderer
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Elective cesarean section for macrosomia?

Authors:  J S Yan; Y K Chang; C S Yin
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei)       Date:  1994-03

7.  Factors contributing to the increased cesarean birth rate in older parturient women.

Authors:  J A Adashek; A M Peaceman; J A Lopez-Zeno; J P Minogue; M L Socol
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  The effect of physician factors on the cesarean section decision.

Authors:  L R Burns; S E Geller; D R Wholey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Maternal age: an independent risk factor for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  J F Peipert; M B Bracken
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  The contribution of dystocia to the cesarean section rate.

Authors:  L M Macara; K W Murphy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  7 in total

1.  Changes in maternal characteristics in Nova Scotia, Canada from 1988 to 2001.

Authors:  Deshayne B Fell; K S Joseph; Linda Dodds; Alexander C Allen; Krista Jangaard; Michiel Van den Hof
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2005 May-Jun

2.  Maternal weight gain during pregnancy and neonatal birth weight: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Santo Monte; Oriana Valenti; Elsa Giorgio; Eliana Renda; Entela Hyseni; Marianna Faraci; Roberta De Domenico; Fosca A F Di Prima
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2011-04

3.  Randomized trial of a behavioral intervention to prevent excessive gestational weight gain: the Fit for Delivery Study.

Authors:  Suzanne Phelan; Maureen G Phipps; Barbara Abrams; Francine Darroch; Andrew Schaffner; Rena R Wing
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  How should gestational weight gain be assessed? A comparison of existing methods and a novel method, area under the weight gain curve.

Authors:  Ken P Kleinman; Emily Oken; Jenny S Radesky; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Karen E Peterson; Matthew W Gillman
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Pregnancy: a "teachable moment" for weight control and obesity prevention.

Authors:  Suzanne Phelan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Cesarean section indications and anthropometric parameters in Rwandan nulliparae: preliminary results from a longitudinal survey.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Kakoma
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-08-12

7.  A safe, low-cost, easy-to-use 3D camera platform to assess risk of obstructed labor due to cephalopelvic disproportion.

Authors:  Rudolph L Gleason; Mahlet Yigeremu; Tequam Debebe; Sisay Teklu; Daniel Zewdeneh; Michael Weiler; Nate Frank; Lorenzo Tolentino; Shehab Attia; J Brandon Dixon; Catherine Kwon; Anastassia Pokutta-Paskaleva; Katie A Gleason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.