Literature DB >> 18689677

Cooperative capture of large prey solves scaling challenge faced by spider societies.

Eric C Yip1, Kimberly S Powers, Leticia Avilés.   

Abstract

A decrease in the surface area per unit volume is a well known constraint setting limits to the size of organisms at both the cellular and whole-organismal levels. Similar constraints may apply to social groups as they grow in size. The communal three-dimensional webs that social spiders build function ecologically as single units that intercept prey through their surface and should thus be subject to this constraint. Accordingly, we show that web prey capture area per spider, and thus number of insects captured per capita, decreases with colony size in a neotropical social spider. Prey biomass intake per capita, however, peaks at intermediate colony sizes because the spiders forage cooperatively and larger colonies capture increasingly large insects. A peaked prey biomass intake function would explain not only why these spiders live in groups and cooperate but also why they disperse only at large colony sizes, thus addressing both sociality and colony size range in this social spider. These findings may also explain the conspicuous absence of social spiders from higher latitudes and higher elevations, areas that we have previously shown to harbor considerably fewer insects of the largest size classes than the lowland tropical rainforests where social spiders thrive. Our findings thus illustrate the relevance of scaling laws to the size and functioning of levels of organization above the individual.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18689677      PMCID: PMC2575263          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0710603105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  15 in total

1.  The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms.

Authors:  G B West; J H Brown; B J Enquist
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-06-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Multicellularity and the functional interdependence of motility and molecular transport.

Authors:  Cristian A Solari; Sujoy Ganguly; John O Kessler; Richard E Michod; Raymond E Goldstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Multiple techniques confirm elevational differences in insect size that may influence spider sociality.

Authors:  Jennifer Guevara; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  The role of prey size and abundance in the geographical distribution of spider sociality.

Authors:  Kimberly S Powers; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Colony size and individual fitness in the social spider Anelosimus eximius.

Authors:  L Avilés; P Tufiño
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Altitudinal patterns of spider sociality and the biology of a new midelevation social Anelosimus species in Ecuador.

Authors:  Leticia Avilés; Ingi Agnarsson; Patricio A Salazar; Jessica Purcell; Gabriel Iturralde; Eric C Yip; Kimberly S Powers; Todd C Bukowski
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology.

Authors:  G B West; J H Brown; B J Enquist
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Mammalian eusociality: a family affair.

Authors:  J U Jarvis; M J O'Riain; N C Bennett; P W Sherman
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Smaller colonies and more solitary living mark higher elevation populations of a social spider.

Authors:  Jessica Purcell; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Huddling behavior in emperor penguins: Dynamics of huddling.

Authors:  Caroline Gilbert; Graham Robertson; Yvon Le Maho; Yasuhiko Naito; André Ancel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-06-05
View more
  25 in total

1.  How within-group behavioural variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Susan E Riechert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Differences in group size and the extent of individual participation in group hunting may contribute to differential prey-size use among social spiders.

Authors:  Gyan Harwood; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Collective behavior and colony persistence of social spiders depends on their physical environment.

Authors:  Ambika Kamath; Skylar D Primavera; Colin M Wright; Grant N Doering; Kirsten A Sheehy; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  Spatial proximity and prey vibratory cues influence collective hunting in social spiders.

Authors:  Colin M Wright; James L L Lichtenstein; Lauren P Luscuskie; Graham A Montgomery; Sara Geary; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Carl N Keiser
Journal:  Isr J Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 0.559

6.  Trait overdispersion and the role of sociality in the assembly of social spider communities across the Americas.

Authors:  Philippe Fernandez-Fournier; Jennifer Guevara; Catherine Hoffman; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  David and Goliath: potent venom of an ant-eating spider (Araneae) enables capture of a giant prey.

Authors:  Stano Pekár; Onřej Šedo; Eva Líznarová; Stanislav Korenko; Zdeněk Zdráhal
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-05-31

8.  Producers and scroungers: feeding-type composition changes with group size in a socially foraging spider.

Authors:  Marlis Dumke; Marie E Herberstein; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Prey to predator body size ratio in the evolution of cooperative hunting-a social spider test case.

Authors:  Lena Grinsted; Mads F Schou; Virginia Settepani; Christina Holm; Tharina L Bird; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 0.900

10.  Origins of altruism diversity I: The diverse ecological roles of altruistic strategies and their evolutionary responses to local competition.

Authors:  J David Van Dyken; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.