Literature DB >> 20943687

How within-group behavioural variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group.

Jonathan N Pruitt1, Susan E Riechert.   

Abstract

How task specialization, individual task performance and within-group behavioural variation affects fitness is a longstanding and unresolved problem in our understanding of animal societies. In the temperate social spider, Anelosimus studiosus, colony members exhibit a behavioural polymorphism; females either exhibit an aggressive 'asocial' or docile 'social' phenotype. We assessed individual prey-capture success for both phenotypes, and the role of phenotypic composition on group-level prey-capture success for three prey size classes. We then estimated the effect of group phenotypic composition on fitness in a common garden, as inferred from individual egg-case masses. On average, asocial females were more successful than social females at capturing large prey, and colony-level prey-capture success was positively associated with the frequency of the asocial phenotype. Asocial colony members were also more likely to engage in prey-capture behaviour in group-foraging situations. Interestingly, our fitness estimates indicate females of both phenotypes experience increased fitness when occupying colonies containing unlike individuals. These results imply a reciprocal fitness benefit of within-colony behavioural variation, and perhaps division of labour in a spider society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20943687      PMCID: PMC3049074          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  24 in total

1.  Task Partitioning in Insect Societies. I. Effect of Colony Size on Queueing Delay and Colony Ergonomic Efficiency.

Authors:  Carl Anderson; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  Models of division of labor in social insects.

Authors:  S N Beshers; J H Fewell
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Richard Svanbäck; James A Fordyce; Louie H Yang; Jeremy M Davis; C Darrin Hulsey; Matthew L Forister
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 4.  The functions of societies and the evolution of group living: spider societies as a test case.

Authors:  Mary E A Whitehousel; Yael Lubin
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-08

5.  Division of labour and colony efficiency in social insects: effects of interactions between genetic architecture, colony kin structure and rate of perturbations.

Authors:  Markus Waibel; Dario Floreano; Stéphane Magnenat; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview.

Authors:  Andrew Sih; Alison Bell; J Chadwick Johnson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  Future directions in behavioural syndromes research.

Authors:  Alison M Bell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals.

Authors:  Daniel Nettle
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2006-09

9.  Smaller colonies and more solitary living mark higher elevation populations of a social spider.

Authors:  Jessica Purcell; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Genetic diversity in honey bee colonies enhances productivity and fitness.

Authors:  Heather R Mattila; Thomas D Seeley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  52 in total

1.  Personality-dependent dispersal in the invasive mosquitofish: group composition matters.

Authors:  Julien Cote; Sean Fogarty; Tomas Brodin; Kelly Weinersmith; Andrew Sih
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Pruitt & Goodnight reply.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Charles J Goodnight
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The Achilles' heel hypothesis: misinformed keystone individuals impair collective learning and reduce group success.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Colin M Wright; Carl N Keiser; Alex E DeMarco; Matthew M Grobis; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Diverse societies are more productive: a lesson from ants.

Authors:  Andreas P Modlmeier; Julia E Liebmann; Susanne Foitzik
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Experience overrides personality differences in the tendency to follow but not in the tendency to lead.

Authors:  Shinnosuke Nakayama; Martin C Stumpe; Andrea Manica; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Behaviour, morphology and microhabitat use: what drives individual niche variation?

Authors:  Raul Costa-Pereira; Jonathan Pruitt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Behavioural hypervolumes of spider communities predict community performance and disbandment.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Nest site and weather affect the personality of harvester ant colonies.

Authors:  Noa Pinter-Wollman; Deborah M Gordon; Susan Holmes
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  Animal personality aligns task specialization and task proficiency in a spider society.

Authors:  Colin M Wright; C Tate Holbrook; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Persistent social interactions beget more pronounced personalities in a desert-dwelling social spider.

Authors:  Andreas P Modlmeier; Kate L Laskowski; Alex E DeMarco; Anna Coleman; Katherine Zhao; Hayley A Brittingham; Donna R McDermott; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.