Literature DB >> 24284559

Differences in group size and the extent of individual participation in group hunting may contribute to differential prey-size use among social spiders.

Gyan Harwood1, Leticia Avilés.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that the range of prey sizes captured by co-occurring species of group-hunting social spiders correlates positively with their level of sociality. Here, we show that this pattern is probably caused by differences among species in colony size and the extent to which individuals participate in group hunting. We assess levels of participation for each species from the fraction of individuals responding to the struggling prey that partake as attackers and from the extent to which the number of attackers increases with colony size. Of two species that form equally large colonies, the one that captures on average larger prey engaged as attackers a significantly larger fraction of individuals that responded to struggling prey and also increased its number of attackers in larger colonies when presented with large prey items. Surprisingly, a third co-occurring species previously found to capture smaller insects than the other two exhibited the highest levels of participation. This species, however, typically forms small single-family colonies, thereby being limited in the size of insects it can capture. It is thus a combination of colony size and the extent of individual participation (or cooperation) that probably determines patterns of resource use in this community of co-occurring social predators.

Keywords:  cooperation; group hunting; group size; participation; social

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24284559      PMCID: PMC3871347          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  4 in total

1.  The role of prey size and abundance in the geographical distribution of spider sociality.

Authors:  Kimberly S Powers; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  Cooperative capture of large prey solves scaling challenge faced by spider societies.

Authors:  Eric C Yip; Kimberly S Powers; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Altitudinal patterns of spider sociality and the biology of a new midelevation social Anelosimus species in Ecuador.

Authors:  Leticia Avilés; Ingi Agnarsson; Patricio A Salazar; Jessica Purcell; Gabriel Iturralde; Eric C Yip; Kimberly S Powers; Todd C Bukowski
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Spatio-temporal differentiation and sociality in spiders.

Authors:  Jessica Purcell; João Vasconcellos-Neto; Marcelo O Gonzaga; Jeffrey A Fletcher; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Proto-cooperation: group hunting sailfish improve hunting success by alternating attacks on grouping prey.

Authors:  James E Herbert-Read; Pawel Romanczuk; Stefan Krause; Daniel Strömbom; Pierre Couillaud; Paolo Domenici; Ralf H J M Kurvers; Stefano Marras; John F Steffensen; Alexander D M Wilson; Jens Krause
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Trait overdispersion and the role of sociality in the assembly of social spider communities across the Americas.

Authors:  Philippe Fernandez-Fournier; Jennifer Guevara; Catherine Hoffman; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Resting networks and personality predict attack speed in social spiders.

Authors:  Edmund R Hunt; Brian Mi; Rediet Geremew; Camila Fernandez; Brandyn M Wong; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Exposure to predators reduces collective foraging aggressiveness and eliminates its relationship with colony personality composition.

Authors:  Colin M Wright; James L L Lichtenstein; Graham A Montgomery; Lauren P Luscuskie; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Cooperative foraging expands dietary niche but does not offset intra-group competition for resources in social spiders.

Authors:  Marija Majer; Christina Holm; Yael Lubin; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.