Literature DB >> 15576260

Associations between relationship support and psychological reactions of participants and partners to BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in a clinic-based sample.

Sharon Manne1, Janet Audrain, Marc Schwartz, David Main, Clinton Finch, Caryn Lerman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the potential importance of communication about genetic testing between test participants and their significant others, little is known about social support and communication between women undergoing BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing and their partners.
PURPOSE: The aims of this longitudinal study were to examine communication about genetic testing during and following testing and to evaluate whether communication is associated with psychological distress reported by test participants and their partners.
METHODS: Participants were 153 women who were undergoing genetic testing and 118 partners of women undergoing testing. Relationship communication and distress were evaluated at the time of pretest education and 6 months postdisclosure.
RESULTS: Overall, the decision to undergo testing was discussed by the majority of test participants and partners, and most couples felt their partners were supportive. Most women disclosed their results to their partners. Longitudinal analyses suggested that less support and protective buffering were associated with greater distress 6 months postdisclosure among test participants, whereas lower comfort in sharing concerns and partner support were associated with lower distress 6 months postdisclosure among partners.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the majority of couples respond supportively during the test experience, but for a small subset of couples the process can strain the relationship. Partner support during this process is important, particularly for test participants dealing with an uninformative test result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15576260     DOI: 10.1207/s15324796abm2803_10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  10 in total

Review 1.  Family Communication, Risk Perception and Cancer Knowledge of Young Adults from BRCA1/2 Families: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alison L Young; Phyllis N Butow; Janine Vetsch; Veronica F Quinn; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine M Tucker; Claire E Wakefield
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Disclosure of Positive BRCA1/2-Mutation Status in Young Couples: The Journey From Uncertainty to Bonding Through Partner Support.

Authors:  Lindsey M Hoskins; Kevin Roy; June A Peters; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Fam Syst Health       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.950

3.  Emotional distress following genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Marci Lobel; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Women's perceptions of the personal and family impact of genetic cancer risk assessment: focus group findings.

Authors:  Deborah J MacDonald; Linda Sarna; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Role of parenting relationship quality in communicating about maternal BRCA1/2 genetic test results with children.

Authors:  Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Is the psychological impact of genetic testing moderated by support and sharing of test results to family and friends?

Authors:  Julie Lapointe; Michel Dorval; Catherine Noguès; Roxane Fabre; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Sisters in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: communal coping, social integration, and psychological well-being.

Authors:  Laura M Koehly; June A Peters; Natalia Kuhn; Lindsey Hoskins; Anne Letocha; Regina Kenen; Jennifer Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Prevalence and correlates of mothers and fathers attending pretest cancer genetic counseling together.

Authors:  Tiffani A Demarco; Rachel H Nusbaum; Beth N Peshkin; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Judy E Garber; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-07-09

9.  Results of an online community needs assessment for psychoeducational interventions among partners of hereditary breast cancer previvors and survivors.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Darren Mays; Tiffani A DeMarco; McKane E Sharff; Susan Friedman
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 10.  Family Adjustment to Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Pedro Gomes; Giada Pietrabissa; Eunice R Silva; João Silva; Paula Mena Matos; Maria Emília Costa; Vanessa Bertuzzi; Eliana Silva; Maria Carolina Neves; Célia M D Sales
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.