Literature DB >> 18684643

Stimulus-induced Rotary Saturation (SIRS): a potential method for the detection of neuronal currents with MRI.

Thomas Witzel1, Fa-Hsuan Lin, Bruce R Rosen, Lawrence L Wald.   

Abstract

Neuronal currents produce local transient and oscillatory magnetic fields that can be readily detected by MEG. Previous work attempting to detect these magnetic fields with MR focused on detecting local phase shifts and dephasing in T(2) or T(2)-weighted images. For temporally biphasic and multi-phasic local currents the sensitivity of these methods can be reduced through the cancellation of the accrued phase induced by positive and negative episodes of the neuronal current. The magnitude of the phase shift is also dependent on the distribution of the current within the voxel. Since spins on one side of a current source develop an opposite phase shift relative to those on the other side, there is likely to be significant cancellation within the voxel. We introduce a potential method for detecting neuronal currents though their resonant T(1rho) saturation during a spin-lock preparation period. The method is insensitive to the temporal and spatial cancellation effects since it utilizes the multi-phasic nature of the neuronal currents and thus is not sensitive to the sign of the local field. To produce a T(1)(rho) reduction, the Larmor frequency in the rotating frame, which is set by gammaB(1lock) (typically 20 Hz-5 kHz), must match the major frequency components of the stimulus-induced neuronal currents. We validate the method in MRI phantom studies. The rotary saturation spectra showed a sharp resonance when a current dipole within the phantom was driven at the Larmor frequency in the rotating frame. A 7 min block-design experiment was found to be sensitive to a current dipole strength of 56 nAm, an approximate magnetic field of 1 nT at 1.5 mm from the dipole. This dipole moment is similar to that seen using the phase shift method in a similar experimental setup by Konn et al. [Konn, D., Gowland, P., Bowtell, R., 2003. MRI detection of weak magnetic fields due to an extended current dipole in a conducting sphere: a model for direct detection of neuronal currents in the brain. Magn. Reson. Med. 50, 40-49], but is potentially less encumbered by temporal and spatial cancellation effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18684643      PMCID: PMC2579748          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  26 in total

1.  Pulse sequence for multislice T1rho-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Andrew J Wheaton; Arijitt Borthakur; Sridhar R Charagundla; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  MRI detection of weak magnetic fields due to an extended current dipole in a conducting sphere: a model for direct detection of neuronal currents in the brain.

Authors:  Daniel Konn; Penny Gowland; Richard Bowtell
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Directly mapping magnetic field effects of neuronal activity by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jinhu Xiong; Peter T Fox; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The magnetic field inside special conducting geometries due to internal current.

Authors:  Leon Heller; Douglas Ranken; Elaine Best
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Simultaneous magnetoencephalography and SQUID detected nuclear MR in microtesla magnetic fields.

Authors:  Petr Volegov; Andrei N Matlachov; Michelle A Espy; John S George; Robert H Kraus
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  SQUID detected NMR in microtesla magnetic fields.

Authors:  Andrei N Matlachov; Petr L Volegov; Michelle A Espy; John S George; Robert H Kraus
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 7.  On brain's magnetic responses to sensory stimuli.

Authors:  R Hari
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.177

8.  Hunting for neuronal currents: absence of rapid MRI signal changes during visual-evoked response.

Authors:  Renxin Chu; Jacco A de Zwart; Peter van Gelderen; Masaki Fukunaga; Peter Kellman; Tom Holroyd; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Spectral spatiotemporal imaging of cortical oscillations and interactions in the human brain.

Authors:  Fa-Hsuan Lin; Thomas Witzel; Matti S Hämäläinen; Anders M Dale; John W Belliveau; Steven M Stufflebeam
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Oscillatory synchrony between human extrastriate areas during visual short-term memory maintenance.

Authors:  C Tallon-Baudry; O Bertrand; C Fischer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  16 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of oscillating electrical currents.

Authors:  Nicholas W Halpern-Manners; Vikram S Bajaj; Thomas Z Teisseyre; Alexander Pines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Physical principles for scalable neural recording.

Authors:  Adam H Marblestone; Bradley M Zamft; Yael G Maguire; Mikhail G Shapiro; Thaddeus R Cybulski; Joshua I Glaser; Dario Amodei; P Benjamin Stranges; Reza Kalhor; David A Dalrymple; Dongjin Seo; Elad Alon; Michel M Maharbiz; Jose M Carmena; Jan M Rabaey; Edward S Boyden; George M Church; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of ionic currents in solution: the effect of magnetohydrodynamic flow.

Authors:  Mukund Balasubramanian; Robert V Mulkern; William M Wells; Padmavathi Sundaram; Darren B Orbach
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Toward direct MRI of neuro-electro-magnetic oscillations in the human brain.

Authors:  Trong-Kha Truong; Kenneth C Roberts; Marty G Woldorff; Allen W Song
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Direct neural current imaging in an intact cerebellum with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Padmavathi Sundaram; Aapo Nummenmaa; William Wells; Darren Orbach; Daniel Orringer; Robert Mulkern; Yoshio Okada
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Selective magnetic resonance imaging of magnetic nanoparticles by acoustically induced rotary saturation.

Authors:  Bo Zhu; Thomas Witzel; Shan Jiang; Susie Y Huang; Bruce R Rosen; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Fast human brain magnetic resonance responses associated with epileptiform spikes.

Authors:  Padmavathi Sundaram; William M Wells; Robert V Mulkern; Ellen J Bubrick; Edward B Bromfield; Mirjam Münch; Darren B Orbach
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging technology-bridging the gap between noninvasive human imaging and optical microscopy.

Authors:  Jonathan R Polimeni; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Physiologically evoked neuronal current MRI in a bloodless turtle brain: detectable or not?

Authors:  Qingfei Luo; Huo Lu; Hanbing Lu; David Senseman; Keith Worsley; Yihong Yang; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  On the detection of high frequency correlations in resting state fMRI.

Authors:  Cameron Trapp; Kishore Vakamudi; Stefan Posse
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.