Literature DB >> 24187539

Physical principles for scalable neural recording.

Adam H Marblestone1, Bradley M Zamft, Yael G Maguire, Mikhail G Shapiro, Thaddeus R Cybulski, Joshua I Glaser, Dario Amodei, P Benjamin Stranges, Reza Kalhor, David A Dalrymple, Dongjin Seo, Elad Alon, Michel M Maharbiz, Jose M Carmena, Jan M Rabaey, Edward S Boyden, George M Church, Konrad P Kording.   

Abstract

Simultaneously measuring the activities of all neurons in a mammalian brain at millisecond resolution is a challenge beyond the limits of existing techniques in neuroscience. Entirely new approaches may be required, motivating an analysis of the fundamental physical constraints on the problem. We outline the physical principles governing brain activity mapping using optical, electrical, magnetic resonance, and molecular modalities of neural recording. Focusing on the mouse brain, we analyze the scalability of each method, concentrating on the limitations imposed by spatiotemporal resolution, energy dissipation, and volume displacement. Based on this analysis, all existing approaches require orders of magnitude improvement in key parameters. Electrical recording is limited by the low multiplexing capacity of electrodes and their lack of intrinsic spatial resolution, optical methods are constrained by the scattering of visible light in brain tissue, magnetic resonance is hindered by the diffusion and relaxation timescales of water protons, and the implementation of molecular recording is complicated by the stochastic kinetics of enzymes. Understanding the physical limits of brain activity mapping may provide insight into opportunities for novel solutions. For example, unconventional methods for delivering electrodes may enable unprecedented numbers of recording sites, embedded optical devices could allow optical detectors to be placed within a few scattering lengths of the measured neurons, and new classes of molecularly engineered sensors might obviate cumbersome hardware architectures. We also study the physics of powering and communicating with microscale devices embedded in brain tissue and find that, while radio-frequency electromagnetic data transmission suffers from a severe power-bandwidth tradeoff, communication via infrared light or ultrasound may allow high data rates due to the possibility of spatial multiplexing. The use of embedded local recording and wireless data transmission would only be viable, however, given major improvements to the power efficiency of microelectronic devices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain activity mapping; electrical recording; embedded electronics; magnetic resonance imaging; molecular recording; neural recording; optical methods

Year:  2013        PMID: 24187539      PMCID: PMC3807567          DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2013.00137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5188            Impact factor:   2.380


  252 in total

1.  Spectral emission and quantum yield of firefly bioluminescence.

Authors:  H H SELIGER; W D McELROY
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1960-05       Impact factor: 4.013

2.  Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Rio J Vetter; Justin C Williams; Jamille F Hetke; Elizabeth A Nunamaker; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Dynamic imaging with MRI contrast agents: quantitative considerations.

Authors:  Mikhail G Shapiro; Tatjana Atanasijevic; Henryk Faas; Gil G Westmeyer; Alan Jasanoff
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Noninvasive detection of changes in membrane potential in cultured neurons by light scattering.

Authors:  R A Stepnoski; A LaPorta; F Raccuia-Behling; G E Blonder; R E Slusher; D Kleinfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Deep-tissue photoacoustic tomography of a genetically encoded near-infrared fluorescent probe.

Authors:  Grigory S Filonov; Arie Krumholz; Jun Xia; Junjie Yao; Lihong V Wang; Vladislav V Verkhusha
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Direct imaging of macrovascular and microvascular contributions to BOLD fMRI in layers IV-V of the rat whisker-barrel cortex.

Authors:  Xin Yu; Daniel Glen; Shumin Wang; Stephen Dodd; Yoshiyuki Hirano; Ziad Saad; Richard Reynolds; Afonso C Silva; Alan P Koretsky
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Manganese ion enhances T1-weighted MRI during brain activation: an approach to direct imaging of brain function.

Authors:  Y J Lin; A P Koretsky
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  X-ray tomography generates 3-D reconstructions of the yeast, saccharomyces cerevisiae, at 60-nm resolution.

Authors:  Carolyn A Larabell; Mark A Le Gros
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Transgenic strategy for identifying synaptic connections in mice by fluorescence complementation (GRASP).

Authors:  Masahito Yamagata; Joshua R Sanes
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 5.639

10.  Long-term dynamics of CA1 hippocampal place codes.

Authors:  Yaniv Ziv; Laurie D Burns; Eric D Cocker; Elizabeth O Hamel; Kunal K Ghosh; Lacey J Kitch; Abbas El Gamal; Mark J Schnitzer
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  76 in total

Review 1.  A Guide to Emerging Technologies for Large-Scale and Whole-Brain Optical Imaging of Neuronal Activity.

Authors:  Siegfried Weisenburger; Alipasha Vaziri
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Amorphous silicon carbide ultramicroelectrode arrays for neural stimulation and recording.

Authors:  Felix Deku; Yarden Cohen; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Aswini Kanneganti; Timothy J Gardner; Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Generalized analog thresholding for spike acquisition at ultralow sampling rates.

Authors:  Bryan D He; Alex Wein; Lav R Varshney; Julius Kusuma; Andrew G Richardson; Lakshminarayan Srinivasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Magnetoelectric 'spin' on stimulating the brain.

Authors:  Rakesh Guduru; Ping Liang; J Hong; Alexandra Rodzinski; Ali Hadjikhani; Jeffrey Horstmyer; Ernest Levister; Sakhrat Khizroev
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 5.  DNA-based memory devices for recording cellular events.

Authors:  Ravi U Sheth; Harris H Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 6.  Designing tools for assumption-proof brain mapping.

Authors:  Adam H Marblestone; Edward S Boyden
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  Bioelectronic medicines: a research roadmap.

Authors:  Karen Birmingham; Viviana Gradinaru; Polina Anikeeva; Warren M Grill; Victor Pikov; Bryan McLaughlin; Pankaj Pasricha; Douglas Weber; Kip Ludwig; Kristoffer Famm
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  Developmental barcoding of whole mouse via homing CRISPR.

Authors:  Reza Kalhor; Kian Kalhor; Leo Mejia; Kathleen Leeper; Amanda Graveline; Prashant Mali; George M Church
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Technologies for imaging neural activity in large volumes.

Authors:  Na Ji; Jeremy Freeman; Spencer L Smith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 10.  Novel electrode technologies for neural recordings.

Authors:  Guosong Hong; Charles M Lieber
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.