Literature DB >> 17113679

Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail?

Jon R Bridle1, Timothy H Vines.   

Abstract

What stops populations expanding into new territory beyond the edge of a range margin? Recent models addressing this problem have brought together population genetics and population ecology, and some have included interactions among species at range edges. Here, we review these models of adaptation at environmental or parapatric margins, and discuss the contrasting effects of migration in either swamping local adaptation, or supplying the genetic variation that is necessary for adaptation to continue. We illustrate how studying adaptation at range margins (both with and without hybridization) can provide insight into the genetic and ecological factors that limit evolution more generally, especially in response to current rates of environmental change.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17113679     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  133 in total

1.  Exploring neutral and adaptive processes in expanding populations of gilthead sea bream, Sparus aurata L., in the North-East Atlantic.

Authors:  I Coscia; E Vogiatzi; G Kotoulas; C S Tsigenopoulos; S Mariani
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Theoretical perspectives on the statics and dynamics of species' borders in patchy environments.

Authors:  Robert D Holt; Michael Barfield
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Mixed population genomics support for the central marginal hypothesis across the invasive range of the cane toad (Rhinella marina) in Australia.

Authors:  Daryl R Trumbo; Brendan Epstein; Paul A Hohenlohe; Ross A Alford; Lin Schwarzkopf; Andrew Storfer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 4.  Keeping up with a warming world; assessing the rate of adaptation to climate change.

Authors:  Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Can gene flow have negative demographic consequences? Mixed evidence from stream threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Moore; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Gradients of precipitation and ant abundance may contribute to the altitudinal range limit of subsocial spiders: insights from a transplant experiment.

Authors:  Jessica Purcell; Leticia Avilés
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evolutionarily stable range limits set by interspecific competition.

Authors:  Trevor D Price; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Evolved dispersal strategies at range margins.

Authors:  Calvin Dytham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Geographic range limits: achieving synthesis.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Trophic interactions and range limits: the diverse roles of predation.

Authors:  Robert D Holt; Michael Barfield
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.