Literature DB >> 18679735

Patient-specific surgical planning and hemodynamic computational fluid dynamics optimization through free-form haptic anatomy editing tool (SURGEM).

Kerem Pekkan1, Brian Whited, Kirk Kanter, Shiva Sharma, Diane de Zelicourt, Kartik Sundareswaran, David Frakes, Jarek Rossignac, Ajit P Yoganathan.   

Abstract

The first version of an anatomy editing/surgical planning tool (SURGEM) targeting anatomical complexity and patient-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis is presented. Novel three-dimensional (3D) shape editing concepts and human-shape interaction technologies have been integrated to facilitate interactive surgical morphology alterations, grid generation and CFD analysis. In order to implement "manual hemodynamic optimization" at the surgery planning phase for patients with congenital heart defects, these tools are applied to design and evaluate possible modifications of patient-specific anatomies. In this context, anatomies involve complex geometric topologies and tortuous 3D blood flow pathways with multiple inlets and outlets. These tools make it possible to freely deform the lumen surface and to bend and position baffles through real-time, direct manipulation of the 3D models with both hands, thus eliminating the tedious and time-consuming phase of entering the desired geometry using traditional computer-aided design (CAD) systems. The 3D models of the modified anatomies are seamlessly exported and meshed for patient-specific CFD analysis. Free-formed anatomical modifications are quantified using an in-house skeletization based cross-sectional geometry analysis tool. Hemodynamic performance of the systematically modified anatomies is compared with the original anatomy using CFD. CFD results showed the relative importance of the various surgically created features such as pouch size, vena cave to pulmonary artery (PA) flare and PA stenosis. An interactive surgical-patch size estimator is also introduced. The combined design/analysis cycle time is used for comparing and optimizing surgical plans and improvements are tabulated. The reduced cost of patient-specific shape design and analysis process, made it possible to envision large clinical studies to assess the validity of predictive patient-specific CFD simulations. In this paper, model anatomical design studies are performed on a total of eight different complex patient specific anatomies. Using SURGEM, more than 30 new anatomical designs (or candidate configurations) are created, and the corresponding user times presented. CFD performances for eight of these candidate configurations are also presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18679735     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-008-0377-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  62 in total

1.  Nonlinear finite element simulation to elucidate the efficacy of slit arteriotomy for end-to-side arterial anastomosis in microsurgery.

Authors:  Hai Gu; Alvin Chua; Bien-Keem Tan; Kin Chew Hung
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Flow imaging and computing: large artery hemodynamics.

Authors:  David A Steinman; Charles A Taylor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  New power loss optimized Fontan connection evaluated by calculation of power loss using high resolution PC-MRI and CFD.

Authors:  D D Soerensen; K Pekkan; K S Sundareswaran; A P Yoganathan
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

4.  Use of a volumetric target for image-guided surgery.

Authors:  Philip L Gildenberg; Jeffrey Labuz
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 5.  Three-dimensional imaging, surgical planning, and image-guided therapy.

Authors:  M W Vannier; J L Marsh
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Progress in the CFD modeling of flow instabilities in anatomical total cavopulmonary connections.

Authors:  Chang Wang; Kerem Pekkan; Diane de Zélicourt; Marc Horner; Ajay Parihar; Ashish Kulkarni; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  On enhancing planning and navigation of beating-heart mitral valve surgery using pre-operative cardiac models.

Authors:  Cristian A Linte; Marcin Wierzbicki; John Moore; Gérard Guiraudon; Douglas L Jones; Terry M Peters
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

8.  Validated computation of physiologic flow in a realistic coronary artery branch.

Authors:  K Perktold; M Hofer; G Rappitsch; M Loew; B D Kuban; M H Friedman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  The Cleveland Clinic PediPump: virtual fitting studies in children using three-dimensional reconstructions of cardiac computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Diyar Saeed; Yoshio Ootaki; Angela Noecker; Stephan Weber; William A Smith; Brian W Duncan; Kiyotaka Fukamachi
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  Nonlinear power loss during exercise in single-ventricle patients after the Fontan: insights from computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Kevin K Whitehead; Kerem Pekkan; Hiroumi D Kitajima; Stephen M Paridon; Ajit P Yoganathan; Mark A Fogel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  33 in total

1.  Boundary conditions of patient-specific fluid dynamics modelling of cavopulmonary connections: possible adaptation of pulmonary resistances results in a critical issue for a virtual surgical planning.

Authors:  Giancarlo Pennati; Chiara Corsini; Daria Cosentino; Tain-Yen Hsia; Vincenzo S Luisi; Gabriele Dubini; Francesco Migliavacca
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  Computer modeling to tailor therapy for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Michael A Quail; Andrew M Taylor
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Comparing pre- and post-operative Fontan hemodynamic simulations: implications for the reliability of surgical planning.

Authors:  Christopher M Haggerty; Diane A de Zélicourt; Maria Restrepo; Jarek Rossignac; Thomas L Spray; Kirk R Kanter; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Personalised imaging and biomechanical modelling of large vessels.

Authors:  Rob Krams; Marcel Breeuwer; Frans van de Vosse
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Current progress in patient-specific modeling.

Authors:  Maxwell Lewis Neal; Roy Kerckhoffs
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided surgical design: can we optimise the Fontan operation?

Authors:  Christopher M Haggerty; Ajit P Yoganathan; Mark A Fogel
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.093

7.  Pulsatile blood flow in total cavopulmonary connection: a comparison between Y-shaped and T-shaped geometry.

Authors:  Hamidreza Rajabzadeh-Oghaz; Bahar Firoozabadi; Mohammad Said Saidi; Mojdeh Monjezi; Mohammad Ali Navabi Shirazi; Elaheh Malakan Rad
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  A multiscale model for the study of cardiac biomechanics in single-ventricle surgeries: a clinical case.

Authors:  Alessio Meoli; Elena Cutrì; Adarsh Krishnamurthy; Gabriele Dubini; Francesco Migliavacca; Tain-Yen Hsia; Giancarlo Pennati; Andrew Taylor; Alessandro Giardini; Sachin Khambadkone; Silvia Schievano; Marc de Leval; T-Y Hsia; Edward Bove; Adam Dorfman; G Hamilton Baker; Anthony Hlavacek; Francesco Migliavacca; Giancarlo Pennati; Gabriele Dubini; Alison Marsden; Jeffrey Feinstein; Irene Vignon-Clementel; Richard Figliola; John McGregor
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  Effect of flow pulsatility on modeling the hemodynamics in the total cavopulmonary connection.

Authors:  Reza H Khiabani; Maria Restrepo; Elaine Tang; Diane De Zélicourt; Fotis Sotiropoulos; Mark Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Hemodynamic performance of stage-2 univentricular reconstruction: Glenn vs. hemi-Fontan templates.

Authors:  Kerem Pekkan; Lakshimi P Dasi; Diane de Zélicourt; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Mark A Fogel; Kirk R Kanter; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.