Literature DB >> 22670201

Boundary conditions of patient-specific fluid dynamics modelling of cavopulmonary connections: possible adaptation of pulmonary resistances results in a critical issue for a virtual surgical planning.

Giancarlo Pennati1, Chiara Corsini, Daria Cosentino, Tain-Yen Hsia, Vincenzo S Luisi, Gabriele Dubini, Francesco Migliavacca.   

Abstract

Cavopulmonary connections are surgical procedures used to treat a variety of complex congenital cardiac defects. Virtual pre-operative planning based on in silico patient-specific modelling might become a powerful tool in the surgical decision-making process. For this purpose, three-dimensional models can be easily developed from medical imaging data to investigate individual haemodynamics. However, the definition of patient-specific boundary conditions is still a crucial issue. The present study describes an approach to evaluate the vascular impedance of the right and left lungs on the basis of pre-operative clinical data and numerical simulations. Computational fluid dynamics techniques are applied to a patient with a bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis, who later underwent a total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC). Multi-scale models describing the surgical region and the lungs are adopted, while the flow rates measured in the venae cavae are used at the model inlets. Pre-operative and post-operative conditions are investigated; namely, TCPC haemodynamics, which are predicted using patient-specific pre-operative boundary conditions, indicates that the pre-operative balanced lung resistances are not compatible with the TCPC measured flows, suggesting that the pulmonary vascular impedances changed individually after the surgery. These modifications might be the consequence of adaptation to the altered pulmonary blood flows.

Entities:  

Keywords:  congenital heart diseases; haemodynamics; mathematical model; pulmonary impedances; virtual pre-operative planning

Year:  2011        PMID: 22670201      PMCID: PMC3262435          DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2010.0021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interface Focus        ISSN: 2042-8898            Impact factor:   3.906


  29 in total

1.  Tuning multidomain hemodynamic simulations to match physiological measurements.

Authors:  Ryan L Spilker; Charles A Taylor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Incorporating autoregulatory mechanisms of the cardiovascular system in three-dimensional finite element models of arterial blood flow.

Authors:  H J Kim; K E Jansen; C A Taylor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Effects of exercise and respiration on hemodynamic efficiency in CFD simulations of the total cavopulmonary connection.

Authors:  Alison L Marsden; Irene E Vignon-Clementel; Frandics P Chan; Jeffrey A Feinstein; Charles A Taylor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Effects of the non-Newtonian viscosity of blood on flows in a diseased arterial vessel. Part 1: Steady flows.

Authors:  Y I Cho; K R Kensey
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.875

5.  Anatomic distribution of pulmonary vascular compliance.

Authors:  R G Presson; S H Audi; C C Hanger; G M Zenk; R A Sidner; J H Linehan; W W Wagner; C A Dawson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1998-01

6.  Surgical repair of tricuspid atresia.

Authors:  F Fontan; E Baudet
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Outflow boundary conditions for 3D simulations of non-periodic blood flow and pressure fields in deformable arteries.

Authors:  I E Vignon-Clementel; C A Figueroa; K E Jansen; C A Taylor
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.763

8.  On coupling a lumped parameter heart model and a three-dimensional finite element aorta model.

Authors:  H J Kim; I E Vignon-Clementel; C A Figueroa; J F LaDisa; K E Jansen; J A Feinstein; C A Taylor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Multiscale modelling in biofluidynamics: application to reconstructive paediatric cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Francesco Migliavacca; Rossella Balossino; Giancarlo Pennati; Gabriele Dubini; Tain-Yen Hsia; Marc R de Leval; Edward L Bove
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Fontan hemodynamics: importance of pulmonary artery diameter.

Authors:  Lakshmi P Dasi; Resmi Krishnankuttyrema; Hiroumi D Kitajima; Kerem Pekkan; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Mark Fogel; Shiva Sharma; Kevin Whitehead; Kirk Kanter; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Computer modeling to tailor therapy for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Michael A Quail; Andrew M Taylor
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Comparing pre- and post-operative Fontan hemodynamic simulations: implications for the reliability of surgical planning.

Authors:  Christopher M Haggerty; Diane A de Zélicourt; Maria Restrepo; Jarek Rossignac; Thomas L Spray; Kirk R Kanter; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided surgical design: can we optimise the Fontan operation?

Authors:  Christopher M Haggerty; Ajit P Yoganathan; Mark A Fogel
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.093

Review 4.  Imaging for preintervention planning: pre- and post-Fontan procedures.

Authors:  Mark A Fogel; Reza H Khiabani; Ajit Yoganathan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Non-Newtonian Effects on Patient-Specific Modeling of Fontan Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Zhenglun Wei; Shelly Singh-Gryzbon; Phillip M Trusty; Connor Huddleston; Yingnan Zhang; Mark A Fogel; Alessandro Veneziani; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Using 4D Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Validate Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Case Study.

Authors:  Giovanni Biglino; Daria Cosentino; Jennifer A Steeden; Lorenzo De Nova; Matteo Castelli; Hopewell Ntsinjana; Giancarlo Pennati; Andrew M Taylor; Silvia Schievano
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Virtual Transcatheter Interventions for Peripheral Pulmonary Artery Stenosis in Williams and Alagille Syndromes.

Authors:  Ingrid S Lan; Weiguang Yang; Jeffrey A Feinstein; Jacqueline Kreutzer; R Thomas Collins; Michael Ma; Gregory T Adamson; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 6.106

Review 8.  Computational fluid dynamics models and congenital heart diseases.

Authors:  Giancarlo Pennati; Chiara Corsini; Tain-Yen Hsia; Francesco Migliavacca
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.418

9.  An integrated approach to patient-specific predictive modeling for single ventricle heart palliation.

Authors:  Chiara Corsini; Catriona Baker; Ethan Kung; Silvia Schievano; Gregory Arbia; Alessia Baretta; Giovanni Biglino; Francesco Migliavacca; Gabriele Dubini; Giancarlo Pennati; Alison Marsden; Irene Vignon-Clementel; Andrew Taylor; Tain-Yen Hsia; Adam Dorfman
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 1.763

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.