Gokce-Soganci Unsal1, Ilser Turkyilmaz2, Samantha Lakhia3. 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey. 2. Clinical Associate Professor, New York University College of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, New York, NY, USA. 3. Third-year Dental Student, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to review the available literature associated with implant surgery using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) surgical guides and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this advanced technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic literature search was conducted in the PubMed database for the relevant information on implant placement with CAD/CAM surgical guides. This review was constructed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Articles were limited to those published within the past 10 years and in the English language. Only clinical studies were included. Inclusion criteria were: studies including 10 implants or more and studies presenting angular deviations in degrees and linear deviations in millimeter. Observational studies, reviews, animal studies, in vitro studies, case reports, simulation studies were excluded. Nine articles were included for qualitative synthesis. RESULTS: The initial search detected 61 articles, and after screening abstracts, a total of 15 articles were selected for full-text review. After the full-text analysis of the 15 articles, six articles were excluded as they did not meet inclusion criteria for study design, study population, and implant placement with data presentation for angular and linear deviations. Ultimately, nine articles providing angular and linear deviations between planned and actual placed implants were used in this review. Common problems that may be encountered by clinicians were listed, and recommendations were made on how to avoid those problems. CONCLUSIONS: It has been suggested that although unrealistic expectations are often associated with implant placement with CAD/CAM surgical guides, there is no impeccable accuracy in the clinic. This review demonstrated that the practitioners should be aware of the angular and linear deviations up to 5 ° and 2.3 mm. Therefore, inexperienced dentists should obtain adequate training and be familiar with the basic steps with CAD/CAM surgical guides to avoid complications. Key words:CAD/CAM, CBCT, implant, stereolithography, surgical guide. Copyright:
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to review the available literature associated with implant surgery using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) surgical guides and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this advanced technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic literature search was conducted in the PubMed database for the relevant information on implant placement with CAD/CAM surgical guides. This review was constructed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Articles were limited to those published within the past 10 years and in the English language. Only clinical studies were included. Inclusion criteria were: studies including 10 implants or more and studies presenting angular deviations in degrees and linear deviations in millimeter. Observational studies, reviews, animal studies, in vitro studies, case reports, simulation studies were excluded. Nine articles were included for qualitative synthesis. RESULTS: The initial search detected 61 articles, and after screening abstracts, a total of 15 articles were selected for full-text review. After the full-text analysis of the 15 articles, six articles were excluded as they did not meet inclusion criteria for study design, study population, and implant placement with data presentation for angular and linear deviations. Ultimately, nine articles providing angular and linear deviations between planned and actual placed implants were used in this review. Common problems that may be encountered by clinicians were listed, and recommendations were made on how to avoid those problems. CONCLUSIONS: It has been suggested that although unrealistic expectations are often associated with implant placement with CAD/CAM surgical guides, there is no impeccable accuracy in the clinic. This review demonstrated that the practitioners should be aware of the angular and linear deviations up to 5 ° and 2.3 mm. Therefore, inexperienced dentists should obtain adequate training and be familiar with the basic steps with CAD/CAM surgical guides to avoid complications. Key words:CAD/CAM, CBCT, implant, stereolithography, surgical guide. Copyright:
Authors: Ai Komiyama; Andreas Pettersson; Margareta Hultin; Karin Näsström; Björn Klinge Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Date: 2010-09-27 Impact factor: 5.977
Authors: Tiziano Testori; Massimo Robiony; Andrea Parenti; Giuseppe Luongo; Alan L Rosenfeld; Scott D Ganz; George A Mandelaris; Massimo Del Fabbro Journal: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent Date: 2014 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Maximilian Brandt; Kristian Kniha; Andreas Prescher; Frank Hölzle; Ali Modabber; Michael Wolf; Florian Peters Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2019-04-13 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Hanna-Riikka Rantamaa; Jari Kangas; Maarit Jordan; Helena Mehtonen; John Mäkelä; Kimmo Ronkainen; Markku Turunen; Osku Sundqvist; Ismo Syrjä; Jorma Järnstedt; Roope Raisamo Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 3.421