Literature DB >> 18672246

Viscoelastic response of human skin to low magnitude physiologically relevant shear.

Brian Holt1, Anubhav Tripathi, Jeffrey Morgan.   

Abstract

Percutaneous implants are a family of devices that penetrate the skin and all suffer from the same problems of infection because the skin seal around the device is not optimal. Contributing to this problem is the mechanical discontinuity of the skin/device interface leading to stress concentrations and micro-trauma that chronically breaks any seal that forms. In this paper, we have quantified the mechanical behavior of human skin under low-magnitude shear loads over physiological relevant frequencies. Using a stress-controlled rheometer, we have performed isothermal (37 degrees C) frequency response experiments between 0.628 and 75.39 rad/s at 0.5% and 0.04% strain on whole skin and dermis-only, respectively. Step-stress experiments of 5 and 10 Pa shear loads were also conducted as were strain sweep tests (6.28 rad/s). Measurements were made of whole human skin and skin from which the epidermis was removed (dermis-only). At low frequencies (0.628-10 rad/s), the moduli are only slightly frequency dependent, with approximate power-law scaling of the moduli, G' approximately G'' approximately omega(beta), yielding beta=0.05 for whole skin and beta=0.16 for dermis-only samples. Step-stress experiments revealed three distinct phases. The intermediate phase included elastic "ringing" (damped oscillation) which provided new insights and could be fit to a mathematical model. Both the frequency and step-stress response data suggest that the epidermis provides an elastic rigidity and dermis provides viscoelasticity to the whole skin samples. Hence, whole skin exhibited strain hardening while the dermis-only demonstrated stress softening under step-stress conditions. The data obtained from the low-magnitude shear loads and frequencies that approximate the chronic mechanical environment of a percutaneous implant should aid in the design of a device with an improved skin seal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18672246      PMCID: PMC2584606          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  34 in total

1.  Viscoelastic properties of human skin and processed dermis.

Authors:  F H Silver; J W Freeman; D DeVore
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  In vivo model of the mechanical properties of the human skin under suction.

Authors:  S. Diridollou; F. Patat; F. Gens; L. Vaillant; D. Black; J. M. Lagarde; Y. Gall; M. Berson
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Development and evaluation of a novel decellularized vascular xenograft.

Authors:  B S Conklin; E R Richter; K L Kreutziger; D-S Zhong; C Chen
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  How does skin adapt to repetitive mechanical stress to become load tolerant?

Authors:  Y-N Wang; J E Sanders
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Redistribution of stress due to a circular hole in a nonlinear anisotropic membrane.

Authors:  G David; J D Humphrey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Viscoelasticity of isotropically cross-linked actin networks.

Authors:  R Tharmann; M M A E Claessens; A R Bausch
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Steady flow analysis in the vicinity of an end-to-end anastomosis.

Authors:  Y H Kim; K B Chandran
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 8.  Permanent percutaneous devices.

Authors:  A F von Recum; J B Park
Journal:  Crit Rev Bioeng       Date:  1981

9.  Mechanical properties and Young's modulus of human skin in vivo.

Authors:  P G Agache; C Monneur; J L Leveque; J De Rigal
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.017

10.  Dynamics of human walking at steady speeds.

Authors:  Valery B Kokshenev
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 9.161

View more
  18 in total

1.  The shear mechanical properties of diabetic and non-diabetic plantar soft tissue.

Authors:  Shruti Pai; William R Ledoux
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Designing polyHEMA substrates that mimic the viscoelastic response of soft tissue.

Authors:  Brian Holt; Anubhav Tripathi; Jeffrey R Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  A review of tissue-engineered skin bioconstructs available for skin reconstruction.

Authors:  Rostislav V Shevchenko; Stuart L James; S Elizabeth James
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and the foreign body response-part I: theoretical framework.

Authors:  Kristen L Helton; Buddy D Ratner; Natalie A Wisniewski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

Review 5.  Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and foreign body response-part II: examples and application.

Authors:  Kristen L Helton; Buddy D Ratner; Natalie A Wisniewski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

6.  Biomimetic coatings and negative pressure wound therapy independently limit epithelial downgrowth around percutaneous devices.

Authors:  Sujee Jeyapalina; Saranne J Mitchell; Jayant Agarwal; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Eccentric rheometry for viscoelastic characterization of small, soft, anisotropic, and irregularly shaped biopolymer gels and tissue biopsies.

Authors:  Heather A Cirka; Stephan A Koehler; William W Farr; Kristen L Billiar
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Preventing Mesh Pore Collapse by Designing Mesh Pores With Auxetic Geometries: A Comprehensive Evaluation Via Computational Modeling.

Authors:  Katrina M Knight; Pamela A Moalli; Steven D Abramowitch
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 9.  Physical, Spatial, and Molecular Aspects of Extracellular Matrix of In Vivo Niches and Artificial Scaffolds Relevant to Stem Cells Research.

Authors:  Maria Akhmanova; Egor Osidak; Sergey Domogatsky; Sergey Rodin; Anna Domogatskaya
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 10.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.