Literature DB >> 29350744

Preventing Mesh Pore Collapse by Designing Mesh Pores With Auxetic Geometries: A Comprehensive Evaluation Via Computational Modeling.

Katrina M Knight1, Pamela A Moalli2, Steven D Abramowitch3.   

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) meshes are exposed to predominately tensile loading conditions in vivo that can lead to pore collapse by 70-90%, decreasing overall porosity and providing a plausible mechanism for the contraction/shrinkage of mesh observed following implantation. To prevent pore collapse, we proposed to design synthetic meshes with a macrostructure that results in auxetic behavior, the pores expand laterally, instead of contracting when loaded. Such behavior can be achieved with a range of auxetic structures/geometries. This study utilized finite element analysis (FEA) to assess the behavior of mesh models with eight auxetic pore geometries subjected to uniaxial loading to evaluate their potential to allow for pore expansion while simultaneously providing resistance to tensile loading. Overall, substituting auxetic geometries for standard pore geometries yielded more pore expansion, but often at the expense of increased model elongation, with two of the eight auxetics not able to maintain pore expansion at higher levels of tension. Meshes with stable pore geometries that remain open with loading will afford the ingrowth of host tissue into the pores and improved integration of the mesh. Given the demonstrated ability of auxetic geometries to allow for pore size maintenance (and pore expansion), auxetically designed meshes have the potential to significantly impact surgical outcomes and decrease the likelihood of major mesh-related complications.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29350744      PMCID: PMC7104754          DOI: 10.1115/1.4039058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  28 in total

1.  Differential effects of cough, valsalva, and continence status on vesical neck movement.

Authors:  D Howard; J M Miller; J O Delancey; J A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Elongation of textile pelvic floor implants under load is related to complete loss of effective porosity, thereby favoring incorporation in scar plates.

Authors:  Jens Otto; E Kaldenhoff; R Kirschner-Hermanns; Thomas Mühl; Uwe Klinge
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Normal intraabdominal pressure in healthy adults.

Authors:  William S Cobb; Justin M Burns; Kent W Kercher; Brent D Matthews; H James Norton; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model.

Authors:  U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; V Birkenhauer; K Junge; J Conze; V Schumpelick
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Comparative analysis of histopathologic effects of synthetic meshes based on material, weight, and pore size in mice.

Authors:  Sean B Orenstein; Ean R Saberski; Donald L Kreutzer; Yuri W Novitsky
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Vaginal degeneration following implantation of synthetic mesh with increased stiffness.

Authors:  R Liang; S Abramowitch; K Knight; S Palcsey; A Nolfi; A Feola; S Stein; P A Moalli
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  The influence of porosity on the integration histology of two polypropylene meshes for the treatment of abdominal wall defects in dogs.

Authors:  F H Greca; Z A Souza-Filho; A Giovanini; M R Rubin; R F Kuenzer; F B Reese; L M Araujo
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Viscoelastic response of human skin to low magnitude physiologically relevant shear.

Authors:  Brian Holt; Anubhav Tripathi; Jeffrey Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Varying degrees of nonlinear mechanical behavior arising from geometric differences of urogynecological meshes.

Authors:  Andrew Feola; Siladitya Pal; Pamela Moalli; Spandan Maiti; Steven Abramowitch
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  Micromotions and combined damages at the dental implant/bone interface.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Gao; Ya-Rong Zhang; Zhuo-Li Zhu; Hai-Yang Yu
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 6.344

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Complications related to use of mesh implants in surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: infection or inflammation?

Authors:  Naşide Mangir; Sabiniano Roman; Christopher R Chapple; Sheila MacNeil
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Direct Ink Writing of Biocompatible Nanocellulose and Chitosan Hydrogels for Implant Mesh Matrices.

Authors:  Rubina Ajdary; Guillermo Reyes; Jani Kuula; Eija Raussi-Lehto; Tomi S Mikkola; Esko Kankuri; Orlando J Rojas
Journal:  ACS Polym Au       Date:  2021-12-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.