Literature DB >> 15584058

Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.

M Johansson1, A Thune, L Nelvin, M Stiernstam, B Westman, L Lundell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective trial was to determine whether surgical approach (open versus laparoscopic) had an impact on morbidity and postoperative recovery after cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
METHODS: Seventy patients who met the criteria for acute cholecystitis were randomized to open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The type of operation was unknown to the patient and all hospital staff involved in the postoperative care.
RESULTS: The two groups were similar with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics. There were no significant differences in rate of postoperative complications, pain score at discharge and sick leave. In eight patients a laparoscopic procedure was converted to open cholecystectomy. Median operating time was 90 (range 30-155) and 80 (range 50-170) min in the laparoscopic and open groups respectively (P = 0.040). The direct medical costs were equivalent in the two groups. Although median postoperative hospital stay was 2 days in each group, it was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.011).
CONCLUSION: Cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis can be performed by either laparoscopic or open techniques without any major clinically relevant differences in postoperative outcome. Both techniques offer low morbidity and rapid postoperative recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15584058     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  64 in total

Review 1.  Asymptomatic omental granuloma following spillage of gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy protects patients and influences surgeons' decisions: a review.

Authors:  Iordanis N Papadopoulos; Spyridon Christodoulou; Nikolaos Economopoulos
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-01-23

2.  Cholecystectomy in the very elderly--is 90 the new 70?

Authors:  Attila Dubecz; Miriam Langer; Rudolf J Stadlhuber; Michael Schweigert; Norbert Solymosi; Marcus Feith; Hubert J Stein
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a quarter century: why do we still convert?

Authors:  Balazs I Lengyel; Dan Azagury; Oliver Varban; Maria T Panizales; Jill Steinberg; David C Brooks; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkolizadeh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Surgical management of acute cholecystitis: results of a 2-year prospective multicenter survey in Belgium.

Authors:  Benoit Navez; Felicia Ungureanu; Martens Michiels; Donald Claeys; Filip Muysoms; Catherine Hubert; Marc Vanderveken; Olivier Detry; Bernard Detroz; Jean Closset; Bart Devos; Marc Kint; Julie Navez; Francis Zech; Jean-François Gigot
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Original single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder.

Authors:  Kazunari Sasaki; Goro Watanabe; Masamichi Matsuda; Masaji Hashimoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Delayed assessment and eager adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: implications for developing surgical technologies.

Authors:  Alexander C Allori; I Michael Leitman; Elizabeth Heitman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy after gastric resection: a 15-year review.

Authors:  Shannon A Fraser; Harvey Sigman
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States.

Authors:  Nicholas Csikesz; Rocco Ricciardi; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.