Literature DB >> 10954824

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? A prospective study.

A Brodsky1, I Matter, E Sabo, A Cohen, J Abrahamson, S Eldar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in acute cholecystitis is associated with a relatively high rate of conversion to an open procedure as well as a high rate of complications. The aim of this study was to analyze prospectively whether the need to convert and the probability of complications is predictable.
METHODS: A total of 215 patients undergoing LC for acute cholecystitis were studied prospectively by analyzing the data accumulated in the process of investigation and treatment. Factors associated with conversion and complications were assessed to determine their predictive power.
RESULTS: Conversion was indicated in 44 patients (20.5%), and complications occurred in 36 patients (17%). Male gender and age >60 years were associated with conversion, but these factors had no sensitivity and no positive predictive value. The same factors, together with a disease duration of >96 h, a nonpalpable gallbladder, a white blood count (WBC) of >18,000/cc(3), and advanced cholecystitis, predicted conversion with a sensitivity of 74%, a specificity of 86%, a positive predictive value of approximately 40%, and a negative predictive value of 96%. However, these data became available only when LC was underway. Male gender and a temperature of >38 degrees C were associated with complications, but these factors had no sensitivity and no positive predictive value. Progression along the stages of admission and therapy did not add predictive factors or improve the predictive characteristics. Male gender, abdominal scar, bilirubin >1 mg%, advanced cholecystitis, and conversion to open cholecystectomy were associated with infectious complications. Their sensitivity and positive predictive value remained 0 despite progression along the stages of admission and therapy.
CONCLUSION: Although certain preoperative factors are associated with the need to convert a LC for acute cholecystitis, they have limited predictive power. Factors with higher predictive power are obtained only during LC. The need to convert can only be established during an attempt at LC. Preoperative and operative factors associated with total and infectious complications have no predictive power.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10954824     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a safe procedure.

Authors:  P C Willsher; J R Sanabria; S Gallinger; L Rossi; S Strasberg; D E Litwin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. What is the optimal timing for operation?

Authors:  K P Koo; R C Thirlby
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1996-05

3.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  C M Lo; C L Liu; E C Lai; S T Fan; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparoscopic versus open treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  T Koperna; M Kisser; F Schulz
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute or gangrenous cholecystitis.

Authors:  J A Singer; R V McKeen
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder.

Authors:  M R Cox; T G Wilson; A J Luck; P L Jeans; R T Padbury; J Toouli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  D W Rattner; C Ferguson; A L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Factors determining conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G M Fried; J S Barkun; H H Sigman; L Joseph; D Clas; J Garzon; E J Hinchey; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis with subtotal cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K J Ransom
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 0.688

10.  Risk factors in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for conversion to open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J R Sanabria; S Gallinger; R Croxford; S M Strasberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  35 in total

1.  Surgical management of acute cholecystitis: results of a 2-year prospective multicenter survey in Belgium.

Authors:  Benoit Navez; Felicia Ungureanu; Martens Michiels; Donald Claeys; Filip Muysoms; Catherine Hubert; Marc Vanderveken; Olivier Detry; Bernard Detroz; Jean Closset; Bart Devos; Marc Kint; Julie Navez; Francis Zech; Jean-François Gigot
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Biliary complications after hydatid liver surgery: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Cuneyt Kayaalp; Khalid Bzeizi; Ali Eba Demirbag; Musa Akoglu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a 10-year review.

Authors:  Juliane Bingener-Casey; Melanie L Richards; William E Strodel; Wayne H Schwesinger; Kenneth R Sirinek
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion: is the surgeon's selection needed?

Authors:  Sandra C Donkervoort; Lea M Dijksman; Lincey C F de Nes; Pieter G Versluis; Joris Derksen; Michael F Gerhards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy depends upon the establishment of a critical view of safety.

Authors:  Yuichi Yamashita; Taizo Kimura; Sumio Matsumoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  The analysis of 146 patients with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Orhan Bat
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

7.  Predicting Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Based on Clinicoradiological Assessment.

Authors:  Ravindra Nidoni; Tejaswini V Udachan; Prasad Sasnur; Ramakanth Baloorkar; Vikram Sindgikar; Basavaraj Narasangi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-12-01

Review 8.  Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome.

Authors:  Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Impact of Jaundice on Outcomes Following Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Benjamin R Poh; Paul A Cashin; Daniel G Croagh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States.

Authors:  Nicholas Csikesz; Rocco Ricciardi; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.