Literature DB >> 26504415

Does endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography have a negative effect on laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Murat Çakır1, Tevfik Küçükkartallar1, Ahmet Tekin1, Mehmet Aykut Yıldırım1, Adil Kartal1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We have observed that patients who had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) had some difficulties with laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. Through a retrospective study, we planned to compare the surgical procedures between patients who had undergone ERCP and those who had not in order to clarify this.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The results of 122 patients who had undergone ERCP because of choledocholithiasis before undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures between 2008 and 2011 were compared to the values of 2140 patients operated because of cholelithiasis only within the same period.
RESULTS: Among the patients who underwent surgical procedures following ERCP, 80 (65%) were female and 42 (35%) were male. The average age of the patients was 51.9 years (range: 20-83 years). The operation period after the procedure was 30.14 days (range: 1-93 days). Although the hospitalization period was 4.67 days (range: 1-22 days), the postoperative hospitalization period was 2.68 days (range: 1-15 days). Regarding the difficulty of operation, adhesion in 58 (47.5%) patients, bleeding in two (1.6%) patients, and conversion to open procedure in 12 (9.8) patients were observed. In two (1.6%) patients, bleeding and biliary fistula were the reasons for re-operation.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more complicated in patients who underwent ERCP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; negative effect

Year:  2015        PMID: 26504415      PMCID: PMC4605107          DOI: 10.5152/UCD.2015.2809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg        ISSN: 1300-0705


  15 in total

1.  Complications of ERCP.

Authors:  J Shawn Mallery; Todd H Baron; Jason A Dominitz; Jay L Goldstein; William K Hirota; Brian C Jacobson; Jonathan A Leighton; Hareth M Raddawi; John J Varg; J Patrick Waring; Robert D Fanelli; Jo Wheeler-Harbough; Glenn M Eisen; Douglas O Faigel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  MRCP and ERCP in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Ann S Fulcher
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Authors:  Ülkü Saritaş; Yücel Üstündağ; Todd H Baron
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  [Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and how to minimize them].

Authors:  A Vavrecka
Journal:  Vnitr Lek       Date:  2011-12

5.  Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M Johansson; A Thune; L Nelvin; L Lundell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  A current profile and assessment of north american cholecystectomy: results from the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program.

Authors:  Angela M Ingraham; Mark E Cohen; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce Lee Hall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Endosonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography show similar efficacy in selecting patients for ERCP in mild-moderate acute biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  Emrah Alper; Sinan Akay; Zafer Buyraç; Fatih Aslan; Işık Alper; Belkıs Ünsal
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Trends, outcomes, and predictors of open and conversion to open cholecystectomy in Veterans Health Administration hospitals.

Authors:  Haytham M A Kaafarani; Tracy Schifftner Smith; Leigh Neumayer; David H Berger; Ralph G Depalma; Kamal M F Itani
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States.

Authors:  Nicholas Csikesz; Rocco Ricciardi; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Identification of risk factors for an unfavorable laparoscopic cholecystectomy course after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  S C Donkervoort; O van Ruler; L M Dijksman; A A van Geloven; E G Pierik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Retrospective and Prospective Study to Develop a Pre-operative Difficulty Score for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yousef Ibrahim; Rami W Radwan; Ali Adel Ne'ma Abdullah; Mohamed Sherif; Usman Khalid; James Ansell; Ashraf Rasheed
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  3D laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus 2D in choledocholithiasis patients: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Xiaobo Bo; Jie Wang; Lingxi Nan; Yanlei Xin; Zhihui Gao; Changcheng Wang; Min Li; Sheng Shen; Han Liu; Xiaoling Ni; Tao Suo; Pinxiang Lu; Dexiang Zhang; Yueqi Wang; Houbao Liu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Destiny for Rendezvous: Is Cholecysto/Choledocholithiasis Better Treated with Dual- or Single-Step Procedures?

Authors:  S Vaccari; M Minghetti; A Lauro; M I Bellini; A Ussia; S Khouzam; I R Marino; M Cervellera; V D'Andrea; V Tonini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Management of complicated gallstones in the elderly: comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment options.

Authors:  Yousef Nassar; Seth Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2019-01-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.