Literature DB >> 7638995

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three-trocar technique.

K Slim1, D Pezet, J Stencl, C Lechner, S Le Roux, P Lointier, J Chipponi.   

Abstract

At present, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for gallbladder stones. The operating technique reported by most authors includes the use of four trocars. We report a group of 710 consecutive patients treated by an original three-trocar technique. The use of the fourth trocar was necessary in only 55 cases (8%). However, among 56 cases of acute cholecystitis the use of the fourth trocar was necessary in 14 cases (25%) (p < 0.01). Twenty-six laparoscopies were converted to open procedures (3.6%). Four common bile duct injuries were observed (0.5%): two of them among the 655 operations with three trocars (0.3%) and two after application of the fourth trocar at the beginning of the procedure because of dissection difficulties. Our results are similar to those using the "classic" four-trocar technique. Moreover, this technique is less expensive and allows one less scar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7638995     DOI: 10.1007/bf00299168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  11 in total

1.  [3606 cholecystectomies under celioscopy. The Register of the French Society of Digestive Surgery].

Authors:  B Suc; I Fontes Dislaire; G Fourtanier; J Escat
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  1992

2.  A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases.

Authors:  F Dubois; P Icard; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. A comparison with mini-lap cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E J Reddick; D O Olsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases.

Authors:  D J Deziel; K W Millikan; S G Economou; A Doolas; S T Ko; M C Airan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A statewide experience. The Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry.

Authors:  R Orlando; J C Russell; J Lynch; A Mattie
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

7.  Routine cholangiography is not warranted during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D G Clair; D L Carr-Locke; J M Becker; D C Brooks
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

8.  Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients.

Authors:  G M Larson; G C Vitale; J Casey; J S Evans; G Gilliam; L Heuser; G McGee; M Rao; M J Scherm; C R Voyles
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  D W Rattner; C Ferguson; A L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D O Olsen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  25 in total

1.  A new technique for two-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  T Mori; Y Ikeda; K Okamoto; K Sakata; K Ideguchi; K Nakagawa; T Yasumitsu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments and Comparison with Three-Port Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Megha Singh; Kuldeep Singh Mehta; Mir Yasir; Ameet Kaur; Aiffa Aiman; Akangsha Sharma; Neeraj Kaur
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy in clinical practice.

Authors:  Matthias Federlein; Dietmar Borchert; Verena Müller; Yüksel Atas; Frauke Fritze; Jens Burghardt; Dirk Elling; Klaus Gellert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Single-trocar cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope and articulating laparoscopic instruments: a bridge to NOTES or the final form?

Authors:  Ram Elazary; Abed Khalaileh; Gideon Zamir; Michael Har-Lev; Gidon Almogy; Avraham I Rivkind; Yoav Mintz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Trichak
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The road to reduced port surgery: from single big incisions to single small incisions, and beyond.

Authors:  Paul G Curcillo; Erica R Podolsky; Stephanie A King
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases.

Authors:  Paul G Curcillo; Andrew S Wu; Erica R Podolsky; Casey Graybeal; Namir Katkhouda; Alex Saenz; Robert Dunham; Steven Fendley; Marc Neff; Chad Copper; Marc Bessler; Andrew A Gumbs; Michael Norton; Antonio Iannelli; Rodney Mason; Ashkan Moazzez; Larry Cohen; Angela Mouhlas; Alex Poor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  [Reduced port surgery : Developing a safe pathway to single port access surgery].

Authors:  P G Curcillo; A S Wu; E R Podolsky; S A King
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Shaoliang Sun; Kehu Yang; Mingtai Gao; Xiaodong He; Jinhui Tian; Bin Ma
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States.

Authors:  Nicholas Csikesz; Rocco Ricciardi; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.