Literature DB >> 18654830

Indirect genetic effects and the lek paradox: inter-genotypic competition may strengthen genotype x environment interactions and conserve genetic variance.

Anne M Danielson-François1, Yihong Zhou, Michael D Greenfield.   

Abstract

Understanding the evolutionary mechanisms that maintain genetic variation in natural populations is one of the fundamental goals of evolutionary biology. There is growing evidence that genotype-by-environment interaction (G x E) can maintain additive genetic variance (V (A)), but we lack information on the relative performance of genotypes under the competitive situations encountered in the field. Competing genotypes may influence each other, and this interaction is also subject to selection through indirect genetic effects (IGE). Here, we explore how genotypes perform when interacting and evaluate IGE in order to understand its influence on V (A) for sexually-selected traits in the lesser waxmoth, Achroia grisella. We found that inter-genotype differences and crossover interactions under joint rearing are equal to or greater than values when reared separately. A focal genotype exhibited different performances when jointly reared with various genotypes-suggesting that IGE may be responsible for the increased levels of crossover and differences in performance observed. We suggest that some genotypes are superior competitors for food acquisition in the larval stage, and that these differences influence the development and evolution of other genotypes through IGE. We reaffirm the role of G x E in maintaining V (A) and note the general importance of IGE in studies of evolutionary mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18654830     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-008-9297-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  32 in total

1.  Quantitative genetics of ultrasonic advertisement signalling in the lesser waxmoth Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: pyralidae).

Authors:  R D Collins; Y Jang; K Reinhold; M D Greenfield
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Gene interactions from maternal effects.

Authors:  J B Wolf
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Cooperation and competition between relatives.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ido Pen; Ashleigh S Griffin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Genetic benefits of a female mating preference in gray tree frogs are context-dependent.

Authors:  Allison M Welch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  P Vos; R Hogers; M Bleeker; M Reijans; T van de Lee; M Hornes; A Frijters; J Pot; J Peleman; M Kuiper
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  THE SYMMETRY OF CORRELATED SELECTION RESPONSES IN ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY USING DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  Jason Shiotsugu; Armand M Leroi; Hideko Yashiro; Michael R Rose; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Interaction between strains in the social relations of inbred mice.

Authors:  A L Hughes
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  ABSOLUTE VERSUS RELATIVE MEASUREMENTS OF SEXUAL SELECTION: ASSESSING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF ULTRASONIC SIGNAL CHARACTERS TO MATE ATTRACTION IN LESSER WAX MOTHS, ACHROIA GRISELLA (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE).

Authors:  Yikweon Jang; Michael D Greenfield
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Signal reliability compromised by genotype-by-environment interaction and potential mechanisms for its preservation.

Authors:  Suzanne C Mills; Rauno V Alatalo; Esa Koskela; Johanna Mappes; Tapio Mappes; Tuula A Oksanen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  5 in total

1.  Genetic variation in social influence on mate preferences.

Authors:  Darren Rebar; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genetic and environmental variation in transcriptional expression of seminal fluid proteins.

Authors:  Bahar Patlar; Michael Weber; Steven A Ramm
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Differential sperm expenditure reveals a possible role for post-copulatory sexual selection in a lekking moth.

Authors:  Nils Cordes; Arzu Yiğit; Leif Engqvist; Tim Schmoll
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Indirect genetic effects for growth rate in domestic pigs alter aggressive and manipulative biting behaviour.

Authors:  Irene Camerlink; Winanda W Ursinus; Piter Bijma; Bas Kemp; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Development of a Genomic Resource and Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping of Male Calling Traits in the Lesser Wax Moth, Achroia grisella.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gleason; Yihong Zhou; Jennifer L Hackett; Bethany R Harris; Michael D Greenfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.