Literature DB >> 17598753

Signal reliability compromised by genotype-by-environment interaction and potential mechanisms for its preservation.

Suzanne C Mills1, Rauno V Alatalo, Esa Koskela, Johanna Mappes, Tapio Mappes, Tuula A Oksanen.   

Abstract

Sexual selection based on signaling requires that signals used by females in mate choice are reliable indicators of a male's heritable total fitness. A signal and the preference for it are expected to be heritable, resulting in the maintenance of genetic covariance between these two traits. However, a recent article has proposed that signals may quickly become unreliable in the presence of both environmental variation and genotype-by-environment interaction (G x E) with crossing reaction norms, potentially compromising the mechanisms of sexual selection. Here we examine the heritability and plasticity of a male dominance advertisement in the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus, in stable and changing rearing environments from father to son. The bank vole is naturally exposed to considerable sources of spatial and temporal environmental variation and male reproductive success is determined by both intra- (male-male competition) and inter- (females prefer to mate with dominant males) sexual selection. Significant G x E for male dominance was found with crossing reaction norms. Plasma testosterone level (T), rather than condition, determined a male's dominance and T also showed a significant G x E. Dominance showed a considerable plasticity across environments, but was only heritable under stable conditions. We document a negative between-environments correlation of male dominance, suggesting that when the environment changes between father and son, the dominance signal is unreliable to females and sexual selection may be compromised. We discuss how G x E and environmental variation interacting with other mechanisms may preserve the reliability of signals and thus the mechanism of sexual selection itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17598753     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00145.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

Review 1.  Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress.

Authors:  Luc F Bussière; John Hunt; Kai N Stölting; Michael D Jennions; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 2.  Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms.

Authors:  Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Katja Heubel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Indirect genetic effects and the lek paradox: inter-genotypic competition may strengthen genotype x environment interactions and conserve genetic variance.

Authors:  Anne M Danielson-François; Yihong Zhou; Michael D Greenfield
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Genotype × environment interaction is weaker in genitalia than in mating signals and body traits in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).

Authors:  Rafael L Rodríguez; Nooria Al-Wathiqui
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Quantitative measure of sexual selection with respect to the operational sex ratio: a comparison of selection indices.

Authors:  Suzanne C Mills; Alessandro Grapputo; Esa Koskela; Tapio Mappes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Intralocus sexual conflict for fitness: sexually antagonistic alleles for testosterone.

Authors:  Suzanne C Mills; Esa Koskela; Tapio Mappes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  No evidence for heritability of male mating latency or copulation duration across social environments in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Michelle L Taylor; Jonathan P Evans; Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Maternal investment in relation to sex ratio and offspring number in a small mammal - a case for Trivers and Willard theory?

Authors:  Esa Koskela; Tapio Mappes; Tuuli Niskanen; Joanna Rutkowska
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Resource quality affects weapon and testis size and the ability of these traits to respond to selection in the leaf-footed cactus bug, Narnia femorata.

Authors:  Daniel A Sasson; Patricio R Munoz; Salvador A Gezan; Christine W Miller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.