Literature DB >> 11209768

Gene interactions from maternal effects.

J B Wolf1.   

Abstract

Theoretical analyses have demonstrated a potential role for epistasis in many of the most important processes in evolution. These analyses generally assume that an individual's genes map directly to its phenotype and epistasis results from interactions among loci that contribute to the same biochemical or developmental pathways (termed physiological, or within-genotype, epistasis). For many characters, particularly those expressed early in life, an individual's phenotype may also be affected by genes expressed by its parents. The presence of these parental effects allows for interactions between the genes present in the parental and offspring genomes. When the phenotypic effect of a locus in the offspring depends on the alleles possessed by its parents, genotype-by-genotype, or among-genotype, epistasis occurs. The among-genotype epistasis resulting from parental effects may contribute to ruggedness of adaptive landscapes because early mortality often accounts for much of the variance in fitness in populations. To demonstrate how parent-offspring interactions can result in among-genotype epistasis, I use a two-locus model, with one maternal effect locus and one direct effect locus, each with two alleles. Dynamical equations are presented for the two-locus model and are directly contrasted with the dynamical equations derived for a model for physiological epistasis. The relationship between the evolutionary dynamics resulting from these two forms of epistasis is discussed. Three scenarios are presented to illustrate systems in which maternal-offspring, genotype-by-genotype epistasis may occur. The implications of maternal-offspring epistasis for quantitative-trait-loci studies are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11209768     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb01235.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  31 in total

Review 1.  Immune function across generations: integrating mechanism and evolutionary process in maternal antibody transmission.

Authors:  Jennifer L Grindstaff; Edmund D Brodie; Ellen D Ketterson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  An improved genetic model generates high-resolution mapping of QTL for protein quality in maize endosperm.

Authors:  Rongling Wu; Xiang-Yang Lou; Chang-Xing Ma; Xuelu Wang; Brian A Larkins; George Casella
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coadaptation in mother and infant regulated by a paternally expressed imprinted gene.

Authors:  James P Curley; Sheila Barton; Azim Surani; Eric B Keverne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Mapping quantitative trait Loci interactions from the maternal and offspring genomes.

Authors:  Yuehua Cui; George Casella; Rongling Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits.

Authors:  Donna Petfield; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The influence of phenotypic and genetic effects on maternal provisioning and offspring weight gain in mice.

Authors:  Reinmar Hager; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Correlated evolution of maternally derived yolk testosterone and early developmental traits in passerine birds.

Authors:  K B Gorman; T D Williams
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Indirect genetic effects and the lek paradox: inter-genotypic competition may strengthen genotype x environment interactions and conserve genetic variance.

Authors:  Anne M Danielson-François; Yihong Zhou; Michael D Greenfield
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 9.  What are maternal effects (and what are they not)?

Authors:  Jason B Wolf; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Differences in offspring size predict the direction of isolation asymmetry between populations of a placental fish.

Authors:  Matthew Schrader; Rebecca C Fuller; Joseph Travis
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.