BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated a high sensitivity (S) of 16-multidetector computed tomography (16-MDCT) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Whether these results are applicable to clinical practice is unclear. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare 16-MDCT angiography with conventional coronary angiography (CCA) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses in a consecutive series of patients. METHOD: A total of 93 consecutive patients (mean [+/- SD] age 59+/-9 years), in whom CCA was performed for stable angina pectoris, underwent 16-MDCT angiography (16x0.75 mm, table feed 6.5 mm/s, rotation time 0.42 s; Sensation 16, Siemens Medical Solutions, Germany) the day before performing CCA. Patients with diabetes mellitus, serum creatinine level higher than 132.6 mumol/L and/or acute coronary syndromes were excluded. Two observers blinded to CCA results evaluated MDCT angiograms according to standard criteria. Segment-based (13 segments per patient) and patient-based (at least one stenosis greater than 50% lumen diameter reduction) analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1209 segments were analyzed. Of these segments, 173 (14%) were excluded due to poor image quality or massive calcification. In 86 segments, CCA revealed significant coronary artery stenosis (greater than 50% diameter reduction). However, 16-MDCT detected only 47 of these, resulting in a S of 55% and a specificity (SP) of 97% (positive predictive value 64%; negative predictive value 96%). On a patient-based analysis, the S increased to 89%, whereas the SP still remained high (87%). CONCLUSION: In this relatively large consecutive cohort, S for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses was moderate on a segment-based analysis but increased on a patient-based analysis using 16-MDCT. In contrast, SP was high in both analyses, supporting the use of 16-MDCT for the exclusion of significant coronary artery stenoses. Further improvement of spatial and temporal resolution in MDCT technology may lead to a lower exclusion rate and higher S.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated a high sensitivity (S) of 16-multidetector computed tomography (16-MDCT) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Whether these results are applicable to clinical practice is unclear. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare 16-MDCT angiography with conventional coronary angiography (CCA) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses in a consecutive series of patients. METHOD: A total of 93 consecutive patients (mean [+/- SD] age 59+/-9 years), in whom CCA was performed for stable angina pectoris, underwent 16-MDCT angiography (16x0.75 mm, table feed 6.5 mm/s, rotation time 0.42 s; Sensation 16, Siemens Medical Solutions, Germany) the day before performing CCA. Patients with diabetes mellitus, serum creatinine level higher than 132.6 mumol/L and/or acute coronary syndromes were excluded. Two observers blinded to CCA results evaluated MDCT angiograms according to standard criteria. Segment-based (13 segments per patient) and patient-based (at least one stenosis greater than 50% lumen diameter reduction) analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1209 segments were analyzed. Of these segments, 173 (14%) were excluded due to poor image quality or massive calcification. In 86 segments, CCA revealed significant coronary artery stenosis (greater than 50% diameter reduction). However, 16-MDCT detected only 47 of these, resulting in a S of 55% and a specificity (SP) of 97% (positive predictive value 64%; negative predictive value 96%). On a patient-based analysis, the S increased to 89%, whereas the SP still remained high (87%). CONCLUSION: In this relatively large consecutive cohort, S for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses was moderate on a segment-based analysis but increased on a patient-based analysis using 16-MDCT. In contrast, SP was high in both analyses, supporting the use of 16-MDCT for the exclusion of significant coronary artery stenoses. Further improvement of spatial and temporal resolution in MDCT technology may lead to a lower exclusion rate and higher S.
Authors: S Achenbach; T Giesler; D Ropers; S Ulzheimer; H Derlien; C Schulte; E Wenkel; W Moshage; W Bautz; W G Daniel; W A Kalender; U Baum Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-05-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Christoph R Becker; Andreas Knez; Alexander Leber; Hendrik Treede; B Ohnesorge; U Joseph Schoepf; Maximilian F Reiser Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2002 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: David Maintz; Harald Seifarth; Thomas Flohr; Stefan Krämer; Thomas Wichter; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: A F Kopp; S Schroeder; A Kuettner; A Baumbach; C Georg; R Kuzo; M Heuschmid; B Ohnesorge; K R Karsch; C D Claussen Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Joanne D Schuijf; Jeroen J Bax; J Wouter Jukema; Hildo J Lamb; Hazem M A Warda; Hubert W Vliegen; Albert de Roos; Ernst E van der Wall Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Dieter Ropers; Ulrich Baum; Karsten Pohle; Katharina Anders; Stefan Ulzheimer; Bernd Ohnesorge; Christian Schlundt; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nico R Mollet; Filippo Cademartiri; Koen Nieman; Francesco Saia; Pedro A Lemos; Eugene P McFadden; Peter M T Pattynama; Patrick W Serruys; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-06-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Axel Kuettner; Andreas F Kopp; Stephen Schroeder; Thilo Rieger; Juergen Brunn; Christoph Meisner; Martin Heuschmid; Tobias Trabold; Christof Burgstahler; Jens Martensen; Wolfgang Schoebel; Hans-Konrad Selbmann; Claus D Claussen Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-03-03 Impact factor: 24.094